POSTPONE
Literal
This manual documents Gforth. Some introductory material is provided for readers who are unfamiliar with Forth or who are migrating to Gforth from other Forth compilers. However, this manual is primarily a reference manual.
The goal of the Gforth Project is to develop a standard model for ANS Forth. This can be split into several subgoals:
To achieve these goals Gforth should be
Have we achieved these goals? Gforth conforms to the ANS Forth standard. It may be considered a model, but we have not yet documented which parts of the model are stable and which parts we are likely to change. It certainly has not yet become a de facto standard, but it appears to be quite popular. It has some similarities to and some differences from previous models. It has some powerful features, but not yet everything that we envisioned. We certainly have achieved our execution speed goals (see section Performance)(1). It is free and available on many machines.
Note: ultimately, the Gforth man page will be auto-generated from the material in this chapter.
For related information about the creation of images see section Image Files.
Gforth is made up of two parts; an executable "engine" (named
@command{gforth} or @command{gforth-fast}) and an image file. To start it, you
will usually just say gforth -- this automatically loads the
default image file `gforth.fi'. In many other cases the default
Gforth image will be invoked like this:
gforth [file | -e forth-code] ...
This interprets the contents of the files and the Forth code in the order they are given.
In addition to the @command{gforth} engine, there is also an engine called @command{gforth-fast}, which is faster, but gives less informative error messages (see section Error messages) and may catch some stack underflows later or not at all. You should use it for debugged, performance-critical programs.
Moreover, there is an engine called @command{gforth-itc}, which is useful in some backwards-compatibility situations (see section Direct or Indirect Threaded?).
In general, the command line looks like this:
gforth[-fast] [engine options] [image options]
The engine options must come before the rest of the command line. They are:
--image-file file
-i file
--appl-image file
gforthmi --application ....
--path path
-p path
GFORTHPATH or
the path specified at installation time (e.g.,
`/usr/local/share/gforth/0.2.0:.'). A path is given as a list of
directories, separated by `:' (on Unix) or `;' (on other OSs).
--dictionary-size size
-m size
4M). The unit can be one of b (bytes), e (element
size, in this case Cells), k (kilobytes), M (Megabytes),
G (Gigabytes), and T (Terabytes). If no unit is specified,
e is used.
--data-stack-size size
-d size
--return-stack-size size
-r size
--fp-stack-size size
-f size
e refers to floating point numbers.
--locals-stack-size size
-l size
--help
-h
--version
-v
--debug
--offset-image
--no-offset-im
--clear-dictionary
--die-on-signal
THROW. With this option, Gforth exits if it receives such a
signal. This option is useful when the engine and/or the image might be
severely broken (such that it causes another signal before recovering
from the first); this option avoids endless loops in such cases.
--no-dynamic
--dynamic
--no-super
--ss-number=N
gforth-fast has
any). This option is useful for measuring the performance impact of
static superinstructions.
--ss-min-codesize
--ss-min-ls
--ss-min-lsu
--ss-min-nexts
Codesize
is the native code size of the primive or static superinstruction,
ls is the number of loads and stores, lsu is the number of
loads, stores, and updates, and nexts is the number of dispatches
(not taking dynamic superinstructions into account), i.e. every
primitive or static superinstruction has cost 1. Default:
codesize if you use dynamic code generation, otherwise
nexts.
--ss-greedy
--print-metrics
code size is the actual size of the dynamically generated code.
Metric codesize is the sum of the codesize metrics as seen by
static superinstruction selection; there is a difference from code
size, because not all primitives and static superinstructions are
compiled into dynamically generated code, and because of markers. The
other metrics correspond to the @option{ss-min-...} options. This
option is useful for evaluating the effects of the @option{--ss-...}
options.
As explained above, the image-specific command-line arguments for the
default image `gforth.fi' consist of a sequence of filenames and
-e forth-code options that are interpreted in the sequence
in which they are given. The -e forth-code or
--evaluate forth-code option evaluates the Forth
code. This option takes only one argument; if you want to evaluate more
Forth words, you have to quote them or use -e several times. To exit
after processing the command line (instead of entering interactive mode)
append -e bye to the command line.
If you have several versions of Gforth installed, gforth will
invoke the version that was installed last. gforth-version
invokes a specific version. If your environment contains the variable
GFORTHPATH, you may want to override it by using the
--path option.
Not yet implemented:
On startup the system first executes the system initialization file
(unless the option --no-init-file is given; note that the system
resulting from using this option may not be ANS Forth conformant). Then
the user initialization file `.gforth.fs' is executed, unless the
option --no-rc is given; this file is searched for in `.',
then in `~', then in the normal path (see above).
You can leave Gforth by typing bye or Ctrl-d (at the start
of a line) or (if you invoked Gforth with the --die-on-signal
option) Ctrl-c. When you leave Gforth, all of your definitions and
data are discarded. For ways of saving the state of the system before
leaving Gforth see section Image Files.
bye -- tools-ext ``bye''
Return control to the host operating system (if any).
Gforth maintains a history file that records every line that you type to the text interpreter. This file is preserved between sessions, and is used to provide a command-line recall facility; if you type Ctrl-P repeatedly you can recall successively older commands from this (or previous) session(s). The full list of command-line editing facilities is:
bye).
Ctrl-d on a non-empty line) to delete the
character under the cursor.
When editing, displayable characters are inserted to the left of the cursor position; the line is always in "insert" (as opposed to "overstrike") mode.
On Unix systems, the history file is `~/.gforth-history' by default(2). You can find out the name and location of your history file using:
history-file type \ Unix-class systems history-file type \ Other systems history-dir type
If you enter long definitions by hand, you can use a text editor to paste them out of the history file into a Forth source file for reuse at a later time.
Gforth never trims the size of the history file, so you should do this periodically, if necessary.
Gforth uses these environment variables:
GFORTHHIST -- (Unix systems only) specifies the directory in which to
open/create the history file, `.gforth-history'. Default:
$HOME.
GFORTHPATH -- specifies the path used when searching for the gforth image file and
for Forth source-code files.
GFORTH -- used by `gforthmi', See section `gforthmi'.
GFORTHD -- used by `gforthmi', See section `gforthmi'.
TMP, TEMP - (non-Unix systems only) used as a potential
location for the history file.
All the Gforth environment variables default to sensible values if they are not set.
When you install Gforth on a Unix system, it installs files in these locations by default:
You can select different places for installation by using
configure options (listed with configure --help).
Gforth can be used in pipes created elsewhere (described here). It can also create pipes on its own (see section Pipes).
If you pipe into Gforth, your program should read with read-file
or read-line from stdin (see section General files).
Key does not recognize the end of input. Words like
accept echo the input and are therefore usually not useful for
reading from a pipe. You have to invoke the Forth program with an OS
command-line option, as you have no chance to use the Forth command line
(the text interpreter would try to interpret the pipe input).
You can output to a pipe with type, emit, cr etc.
When you write to a pipe that has been closed at the other end, Gforth
receives a SIGPIPE signal ("pipe broken"). Gforth translates this
into the exception broken-pipe-error. If your application does
not catch that exception, the system catches it and exits, usually
silently (unless you were working on the Forth command line; then it
prints an error message and exits). This is usually the desired
behaviour.
If you do not like this behaviour, you have to catch the exception yourself, and react to it.
Here's an example of an invocation of Gforth that is usable in a pipe:
gforth -e ": foo begin pad dup 10 stdin read-file throw dup while \ type repeat ; foo bye"
This example just copies the input verbatim to the output. A very simple pipe containing this example looks like this:
cat startup.fs | gforth -e ": foo begin pad dup 80 stdin read-file throw dup while \ type repeat ; foo bye"| head
Pipes involving Gforth's stderr output do not work.
If Gforth is used for CGI scripts or in shell scripts, its startup
speed may become a problem. On a 300MHz 21064a under Linux-2.2.13 with
glibc-2.0.7, gforth -e bye takes about 24.6ms user and 11.3ms
system time.
If startup speed is a problem, you may consider the following ways to improve it; or you may consider ways to reduce the number of startups (for example, by using Fast-CGI).
An easy step that influences Gforth startup speed is the use of the @option{--no-dynamic} option; this decreases image loading speed, but increases compile-time and run-time.
Another step to improve startup speed is to statically link Gforth, by
building it with XLDFLAGS=-static. This requires more memory for
the code and will therefore slow down the first invocation, but
subsequent invocations avoid the dynamic linking overhead. Another
disadvantage is that Gforth won't profit from library upgrades. As a
result, gforth-static -e bye takes about 17.1ms user and
8.2ms system time.
The next step to improve startup speed is to use a non-relocatable image
(see section Non-Relocatable Image Files). You can create this image with
gforth -e "savesystem gforthnr.fi bye" and later use it with
gforth -i gforthnr.fi .... This avoids the relocation overhead
and a part of the copy-on-write overhead. The disadvantage is that the
non-relocatable image does not work if the OS gives Gforth a different
address for the dictionary, for whatever reason; so you better provide a
fallback on a relocatable image. gforth-static -i gforthnr.fi -e
bye takes about 15.3ms user and 7.5ms system time.
The final step is to disable dictionary hashing in Gforth. Gforth
builds the hash table on startup, which takes much of the startup
overhead. You can do this by commenting out the include hash.fs
in `startup.fs' and everything that requires `hash.fs' (at the
moment `table.fs' and `ekey.fs') and then doing make.
The disadvantages are that functionality like table and
ekey is missing and that text interpretation (e.g., compiling)
now takes much longer. So, you should only use this method if there is
no significant text interpretation to perform (the script should be
compiled into the image, amongst other things). gforth-static -i
gforthnrnh.fi -e bye takes about 2.1ms user and 6.1ms system time.
The difference of this chapter from the Introduction (see section An Introduction to ANS Forth) is that this tutorial is more fast-paced, should be used while sitting in front of a computer, and covers much more material, but does not explain how the Forth system works.
This tutorial can be used with any ANS-compliant Forth; any Gforth-specific features are marked as such and you can skip them if you work with another Forth. This tutorial does not explain all features of Forth, just enough to get you started and give you some ideas about the facilities available in Forth. Read the rest of the manual and the standard when you are through this.
The intended way to use this tutorial is that you work through it while sitting in front of the console, take a look at the examples and predict what they will do, then try them out; if the outcome is not as expected, find out why (e.g., by trying out variations of the example), so you understand what's going on. There are also some assignments that you should solve.
This tutorial assumes that you have programmed before and know what, e.g., a loop is.
You can start Gforth by typing its name:
gforth
That puts you into interactive mode; you can leave Gforth by typing
bye. While in Gforth, you can edit the command line and access
the command line history with cursor keys, similar to bash.
A word is a sequence of arbitrary characters (expcept white space). Words are separated by white space. E.g., each of the following lines contains exactly one word:
word !@#$%^&*() 1234567890 5!a
A frequent beginner's error is to leave away necessary white space, resulting in an error like `Undefined word'; so if you see such an error, check if you have put spaces wherever necessary.
." hello, world" \ correct ."hello, world" \ gives an "Undefined word" error
Gforth and most other Forth systems ignore differences in case (they are case-insensitive), i.e., `word' is the same as `Word'. If your system is case-sensitive, you may have to type all the examples given here in upper case.
Type
0 0 ! here execute ' catch >body 20 erase abort ' (quit) >body 20 erase
The last two examples are guaranteed to destroy parts of Gforth (and
most other systems), so you better leave Gforth afterwards (if it has
not finished by itself). On some systems you may have to kill gforth
from outside (e.g., in Unix with kill).
Now that you know how to produce crashes (and that there's not much to them), let's learn how to produce meaningful programs.
The most obvious feature of Forth is the stack. When you type in a
number, it is pushed on the stack. You can display the content of the
stack with .s.
1 2 .s 3 .s
.s displays the top-of-stack to the right, i.e., the numbers
appear in .s output as they appeared in the input.
You can print the top of stack element with ..
1 2 3 . . .
In general, words consume their stack arguments (.s is an
exception).
@assignment
What does the stack contain after 5 6 7 .?
@endassignment
The words +, -, *, /, and mod always
operate on the top two stack items:
2 2 .s + .s . 2 1 - . 7 3 mod .
The operands of -, /, and mod are in the same order
as in the corresponding infix expression (this is generally the case in
Forth).
Parentheses are superfluous (and not available), because the order of the words unambiguously determines the order of evaluation and the operands:
3 4 + 5 * . 3 4 5 * + .
@assignment
What are the infix expressions corresponding to the Forth code above?
Write 6-7*8+9 in Forth notation(3).
@endassignment
To change the sign, use negate:
2 negate .
@assignment Convert -(-3)*4-5 to Forth. @endassignment
/mod performs both / and mod.
7 3 /mod . .
Reference: section Arithmetic.
Stack manipulation words rearrange the data on the stack.
1 .s drop .s 1 .s dup .s drop drop .s 1 2 .s over .s drop drop drop 1 2 .s swap .s drop drop 1 2 3 .s rot .s drop drop drop
These are the most important stack manipulation words. There are also variants that manipulate twice as many stack items:
1 2 3 4 .s 2swap .s 2drop 2drop
Two more stack manipulation words are:
1 2 .s nip .s drop 1 2 .s tuck .s 2drop drop
@assignment
Replace nip and tuck with combinations of other stack
manipulation words.
Given: How do you get: 1 2 3 3 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 1 3 3 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 3
@endassignment
5 dup * .
@assignment
Write 17^3 and 17^4 in Forth, without writing 17 more than once.
Write a piece of Forth code that expects two numbers on the stack
(a and b, with b on top) and computes
(a-b)(a+1).
@endassignment
Reference: section Stack Manipulation.
While working at the Forth command line is convenient for one-line examples and short one-off code, you probably want to store your source code in files for convenient editing and persistence. You can use your favourite editor (Gforth includes Emacs support, see section Emacs and Gforth) to create file.fs and use
s" file.fs" included
to load it into your Forth system. The file name extension I use for Forth files is `.fs'.
You can easily start Gforth with some files loaded like this:
gforth file1.fs file2.fs
If an error occurs during loading these files, Gforth terminates,
whereas an error during INCLUDED within Gforth usually gives you
a Gforth command line. Starting the Forth system every time gives you a
clean start every time, without interference from the results of earlier
tries.
I often put all the tests in a file, then load the code and run the tests with
gforth code.fs tests.fs -e bye
(often by performing this command with C-x C-e in Emacs). The
-e bye ensures that Gforth terminates afterwards so that I can
restart this command without ado.
The advantage of this approach is that the tests can be repeated easily every time the program ist changed, making it easy to catch bugs introduced by the change.
Reference: section Forth source files.
\ That's a comment; it ends at the end of the line ( Another comment; it ends here: ) .s
\ and ( are ordinary Forth words and therefore have to be
separated with white space from the following text.
\This gives an "Undefined word" error
The first ) ends a comment started with (, so you cannot
nest (-comments; and you cannot comment out text containing a
) with ( ... )(4).
I use \-comments for descriptive text and for commenting out code
of one or more line; I use (-comments for describing the stack
effect, the stack contents, or for commenting out sub-line pieces of
code.
The Emacs mode `gforth.el' (see section Emacs and Gforth) supports
these uses by commenting out a region with C-x \, uncommenting a
region with C-u C-x \, and filling a \-commented region
with M-q.
Reference: section Comments.
are similar to procedures and functions in other programming languages.
: squared ( n -- n^2 ) dup * ; 5 squared . 7 squared .
: starts the colon definition; its name is squared. The
following comment describes its stack effect. The words dup *
are not executed, but compiled into the definition. ; ends the
colon definition.
The newly-defined word can be used like any other word, including using it in other definitions:
: cubed ( n -- n^3 ) dup squared * ; -5 cubed . : fourth-power ( n -- n^4 ) squared squared ; 3 fourth-power .
@assignment
Write colon definitions for nip, tuck, negate, and
/mod in terms of other Forth words, and check if they work (hint:
test your tests on the originals first). Don't let the
`redefined'-Messages spook you, they are just warnings.
@endassignment
Reference: section Colon Definitions.
You can decompile colon definitions with see:
see squared see cubed
In Gforth see shows you a reconstruction of the source code from
the executable code. Informations that were present in the source, but
not in the executable code, are lost (e.g., comments).
You can also decompile the predefined words:
see . see +
By convention the comment after the name of a definition describes the stack effect: The part in from of the `--' describes the state of the stack before the execution of the definition, i.e., the parameters that are passed into the colon definition; the part behind the `--' is the state of the stack after the execution of the definition, i.e., the results of the definition. The stack comment only shows the top stack items that the definition accesses and/or changes.
You should put a correct stack effect on every definition, even if it is
just ( -- ). You should also add some descriptive comment to
more complicated words (I usually do this in the lines following
:). If you don't do this, your code becomes unreadable (because
you have to work through every definition before you can understand
any).
@assignment
The stack effect of swap can be written like this: x1 x2 --
x2 x1. Describe the stack effect of -, drop, dup,
over, rot, nip, and tuck. Hint: When you
are done, you can compare your stack effects to those in this manual
(see section Word Index).
@endassignment
Sometimes programmers put comments at various places in colon definitions that describe the contents of the stack at that place (stack comments); i.e., they are like the first part of a stack-effect comment. E.g.,
: cubed ( n -- n^3 ) dup squared ( n n^2 ) * ;
In this case the stack comment is pretty superfluous, because the word is simple enough. If you think it would be a good idea to add such a comment to increase readability, you should also consider factoring the word into several simpler words (see section Factoring), which typically eliminates the need for the stack comment; however, if you decide not to refactor it, then having such a comment is better than not having it.
The names of the stack items in stack-effect and stack comments in the standard, in this manual, and in many programs specify the type through a type prefix, similar to Fortran and Hungarian notation. The most frequent prefixes are:
n
u
c
f
false or true.
a-addr,a-
c-addr,c-
xt
w,x
d
ud
r
You can find a more complete list in section Notation.
@assignment Write stack-effect comments for all definitions you have written up to now. @endassignment
In Forth the names of the operations are not overloaded; so similar
operations on different types need different names; e.g., + adds
integers, and you have to use f+ to add floating-point numbers.
The following prefixes are often used for related operations on
different types:
(none)
u
c
d
ud, du
2
m, um
f
If there are no differences between the signed and the unsigned variant
(e.g., for +), there is only the prefix-less variant.
Forth does not perform type checking, neither at compile time, nor at run time. If you use the wrong oeration, the data are interpreted incorrectly:
-1 u.
If you have only experience with type-checked languages until now, and have heard how important type-checking is, don't panic! In my experience (and that of other Forthers), type errors in Forth code are usually easy to find (once you get used to it), the increased vigilance of the programmer tends to catch some harder errors in addition to most type errors, and you never have to work around the type system, so in most situations the lack of type-checking seems to be a win (projects to add type checking to Forth have not caught on).
If you try to write longer definitions, you will soon find it hard to keep track of the stack contents. Therefore, good Forth programmers tend to write only short definitions (e.g., three lines). The art of finding meaningful short definitions is known as factoring (as in factoring polynomials).
Well-factored programs offer additional advantages: smaller, more general words, are easier to test and debug and can be reused more and better than larger, specialized words.
So, if you run into difficulties with stack management, when writing code, try to define meaningful factors for the word, and define the word in terms of those. Even if a factor contains only two words, it is often helpful.
Good factoring is not easy, and it takes some practice to get the knack for it; but even experienced Forth programmers often don't find the right solution right away, but only when rewriting the program. So, if you don't come up with a good solution immediately, keep trying, don't despair.
In other languages you can use an arbitrary order of parameters for a function; and since there is only one result, you don't have to deal with the order of results, either.
In Forth (and other stack-based languages, e.g., PostScript) the parameter and result order of a definition is important and should be designed well. The general guideline is to design the stack effect such that the word is simple to use in most cases, even if that complicates the implementation of the word. Some concrete rules are:
.).
-).
! (store, see section Memory) expects the
address on top of the stack because it is usually simpler to compute
than the stored value (often the address is just a variable).
open-file return the error code on the top of stack, because
it is usually consumed quickly by throw; moreover, the error code
has to be checked before doing anything with the other results.
These rules are just general guidelines, don't lose sight of the overall goal to make the words easy to use. E.g., if the convention rule conflicts with the computation-length rule, you might decide in favour of the convention if the word will be used rarely, and in favour of the computation-length rule if the word will be used frequently (because with frequent use the cost of breaking the computation-length rule would be quite high, and frequent use makes it easier to remember an unconventional order).
You can define local variables (locals) in a colon definition:
: swap { a b -- b a }
b a ;
1 2 swap .s 2drop
(If your Forth system does not support this syntax, include `compat/anslocals.fs' first).
In this example { a b -- b a } is the locals definition; it
takes two cells from the stack, puts the top of stack in b and
the next stack element in a. -- starts a comment ending
with }. After the locals definition, using the name of the
local will push its value on the stack. You can leave the comment
part (-- b a) away:
: swap ( x1 x2 -- x2 x1 )
{ a b } b a ;
In Gforth you can have several locals definitions, anywhere in a colon definition; in contrast, in a standard program you can have only one locals definition per colon definition, and that locals definition must be outside any controll structure.
With locals you can write slightly longer definitions without running into stack trouble. However, I recommend trying to write colon definitions without locals for exercise purposes to help you gain the essential factoring skills.
@assignment Rewrite your definitions until now with locals @endassignment
Reference: section Locals.
In Forth you can use control structures only inside colon definitions.
An if-structure looks like this:
: abs ( n1 -- +n2 )
dup 0 < if
negate
endif ;
5 abs .
-5 abs .
if takes a flag from the stack. If the flag is non-zero (true),
the following code is performed, otherwise execution continues after the
endif (or else). < compares the top two stack
elements and prioduces a flag:
1 2 < . 2 1 < . 1 1 < .
Actually the standard name for endif is then. This
tutorial presents the examples using endif, because this is often
less confusing for people familiar with other programming languages
where then has a different meaning. If your system does not have
endif, define it with
: endif postpone then ; immediate
You can optionally use an else-part:
: min ( n1 n2 -- n )
2dup < if
drop
else
nip
endif ;
2 3 min .
3 2 min .
@assignment
Write min without else-part (hint: what's the definition
of nip?).
@endassignment
Reference: section Selection.
In a false-flag all bits are clear (0 when interpreted as integer). In
a canonical true-flag all bits are set (-1 as a twos-complement signed
integer); in many contexts (e.g., if) any non-zero value is
treated as true flag.
false . true . true hex u. decimal
Comparison words produce canonical flags:
1 1 = . 1 0= . 0 1 < . 0 0 < . -1 1 u< . \ type error, u< interprets -1 as large unsigned number -1 1 < .
Gforth supports all combinations of the prefixes 0 u d d0 du f f0
(or none) and the comparisons = <> < > <= >=. Only a part of
these combinations are standard (for details see the standard,
section Numeric comparison, section Floating Point or section Word Index).
You can use and or xor invert can be used as operations on
canonical flags. Actually they are bitwise operations:
1 2 and . 1 2 or . 1 3 xor . 1 invert .
You can convert a zero/non-zero flag into a canonical flag with
0<> (and complement it on the way with 0=).
1 0= . 1 0<> .
You can use the all-bits-set feature of canonical flags and the bitwise
operation of the Boolean operations to avoid ifs:
: foo ( n1 -- n2 )
0= if
14
else
0
endif ;
0 foo .
1 foo .
: foo ( n1 -- n2 )
0= 14 and ;
0 foo .
1 foo .
@assignment
Write min without if.
@endassignment
For reference, see section Boolean Flags, section Numeric comparison, and section Bitwise operations.
The endless loop is the most simple one:
: endless ( -- )
0 begin
dup . 1+
again ;
endless
Terminate this loop by pressing Ctrl-C (in Gforth). begin
does nothing at run-time, again jumps back to begin.
A loop with one exit at any place looks like this:
: log2 ( +n1 -- n2 )
\ logarithmus dualis of n1>0, rounded down to the next integer
assert( dup 0> )
2/ 0 begin
over 0> while
1+ swap 2/ swap
repeat
nip ;
7 log2 .
8 log2 .
At run-time while consumes a flag; if it is 0, execution
continues behind the repeat; if the flag is non-zero, execution
continues behind the while. Repeat jumps back to
begin, just like again.
In Forth there are many combinations/abbreviations, like 1+.
However, 2/ is not one of them; it shifts its argument right by
one bit (arithmetic shift right):
-5 2 / . -5 2/ .
assert( is no standard word, but you can get it on systems other
then Gforth by including `compat/assert.fs'. You can see what it
does by trying
0 log2 .
Here's a loop with an exit at the end:
: log2 ( +n1 -- n2 )
\ logarithmus dualis of n1>0, rounded down to the next integer
assert( dup 0 > )
-1 begin
1+ swap 2/ swap
over 0 <=
until
nip ;
Until consumes a flag; if it is non-zero, execution continues at
the begin, otherwise after the until.
@assignment Write a definition for computing the greatest common divisor. @endassignment
Reference: section Simple Loops.
: ^ ( n1 u -- n )
\ n = the uth power of u1
1 swap 0 u+do
over *
loop
nip ;
3 2 ^ .
4 3 ^ .
U+do (from `compat/loops.fs', if your Forth system doesn't
have it) takes two numbers of the stack ( u3 u4 -- ), and then
performs the code between u+do and loop for u3-u4
times (or not at all, if u3-u4<0).
You can see the stack effect design rules at work in the stack effect of the loop start words: Since the start value of the loop is more frequently constant than the end value, the start value is passed on the top-of-stack.
You can access the counter of a counted loop with i:
: fac ( u -- u! )
1 swap 1+ 1 u+do
i *
loop ;
5 fac .
7 fac .
There is also +do, which expects signed numbers (important for
deciding whether to enter the loop).
@assignment Write a definition for computing the nth Fibonacci number. @endassignment
You can also use increments other than 1:
: up2 ( n1 n2 -- )
+do
i .
2 +loop ;
10 0 up2
: down2 ( n1 n2 -- )
-do
i .
2 -loop ;
0 10 down2
Reference: section Counted Loops.
Usually the name of a definition is not visible in the definition; but earlier definitions are usually visible:
1 0 / . \ "Floating-point unidentified fault" in Gforth on most platforms
: / ( n1 n2 -- n )
dup 0= if
-10 throw \ report division by zero
endif
/ \ old version
;
1 0 /
For recursive definitions you can use recursive (non-standard) or
recurse:
: fac1 ( n -- n! ) recursive dup 0> if dup 1- fac1 * else drop 1 endif ; 7 fac1 . : fac2 ( n -- n! ) dup 0> if dup 1- recurse * else drop 1 endif ; 8 fac2 .
@assignment Write a recursive definition for computing the nth Fibonacci number. @endassignment
Reference (including indirect recursion): See section Calls and returns.
EXIT exits the current definition right away. For every counted
loop that is left in this way, an UNLOOP has to be performed
before the EXIT:
: ...
... u+do
... if
... unloop exit
endif
...
loop
... ;
LEAVE leaves the innermost counted loop right away:
: ...
... u+do
... if
... leave
endif
...
loop
... ;
Reference: section Calls and returns, section Counted Loops.
In addition to the data stack Forth also has a second stack, the return stack; most Forth systems store the return addresses of procedure calls there (thus its name). Programmers can also use this stack:
: foo ( n1 n2 -- ) .s >r .s r@ . >r .s r@ . r> . r@ . r> . ; 1 2 foo
>r takes an element from the data stack and pushes it onto the
return stack; conversely, r> moves an elementm from the return to
the data stack; r@ pushes a copy of the top of the return stack
on the return stack.
Forth programmers usually use the return stack for storing data temporarily, if using the data stack alone would be too complex, and factoring and locals are not an option:
: 2swap ( x1 x2 x3 x4 -- x3 x4 x1 x2 ) rot >r rot r> ;
The return address of the definition and the loop control parameters of counted loops usually reside on the return stack, so you have to take all items, that you have pushed on the return stack in a colon definition or counted loop, from the return stack before the definition or loop ends. You cannot access items that you pushed on the return stack outside some definition or loop within the definition of loop.
If you miscount the return stack items, this usually ends in a crash:
: crash ( n -- ) >r ; 5 crash
You cannot mix using locals and using the return stack (according to the standard; Gforth has no problem). However, they solve the same problems, so this shouldn't be an issue.
@assignment Can you rewrite any of the definitions you wrote until now in a better way using the return stack? @endassignment
Reference: section Return stack.
You can create a global variable v with
variable v ( -- addr )
v pushes the address of a cell in memory on the stack. This cell
was reserved by variable. You can use ! (store) to store
values into this cell and @ (fetch) to load the value from the
stack into memory:
v . 5 v ! .s v @ .
You can see a raw dump of memory with dump:
v 1 cells .s dump
Cells ( n1 -- n2 ) gives you the number of bytes (or, more
generally, address units (aus)) that n1 cells occupy. You can
also reserve more memory:
create v2 20 cells allot v2 20 cells dump
creates a word v2 and reserves 20 uninitialized cells; the
address pushed by v2 points to the start of these 20 cells. You
can use address arithmetic to access these cells:
3 v2 5 cells + ! v2 20 cells dump
You can reserve and initialize memory with ,:
create v3 5 , 4 , 3 , 2 , 1 , v3 @ . v3 cell+ @ . v3 2 cells + @ . v3 5 cells dump
@assignment
Write a definition vsum ( addr u -- n ) that computes the sum of
u cells, with the first of these cells at addr, the next
one at addr cell+ etc.
@endassignment
You can also reserve memory without creating a new word:
here 10 cells allot . here .
Here pushes the start address of the memory area. You should
store it somewhere, or you will have a hard time finding the memory area
again.
Allot manages dictionary memory. The dictionary memory contains
the system's data structures for words etc. on Gforth and most other
Forth systems. It is managed like a stack: You can free the memory that
you have just alloted with
-10 cells allot here .
Note that you cannot do this if you have created a new word in the
meantime (because then your alloted memory is no longer on the
top of the dictionary "stack").
Alternatively, you can use allocate and free which allow
freeing memory in any order:
10 cells allocate throw .s 20 cells allocate throw .s swap free throw free throw
The throws deal with errors (e.g., out of memory).
And there is also a
garbage collector, which eliminates the need to free memory
explicitly.
Reference: section Memory.
On the stack characters take up a cell, like numbers. In memory they have their own size (one 8-bit byte on most systems), and therefore require their own words for memory access:
create v4 104 c, 97 c, 108 c, 108 c, 111 c, v4 4 chars + c@ . v4 5 chars dump
The preferred representation of strings on the stack is addr
u-count, where addr is the address of the first character and
u-count is the number of characters in the string.
v4 5 type
You get a string constant with
s" hello, world" .s type
Make sure you have a space between s" and the string; s"
is a normal Forth word and must be delimited with white space (try what
happens when you remove the space).
However, this interpretive use of s" is quite restricted: the
string exists only until the next call of s" (some Forth systems
keep more than one of these strings, but usually they still have a
limited lifetime).
s" hello," s" world" .s type type
You can also use s" in a definition, and the resulting
strings then live forever (well, for as long as the definition):
: foo s" hello," s" world" ; foo .s type type
@assignment
Emit ( c -- ) types c as character (not a number).
Implement type ( addr u -- ).
@endassignment
Reference: section Memory Blocks.
On many processors cells have to be aligned in memory, if you want to
access them with @ and ! (and even if the processor does
not require alignment, access to aligned cells is faster).
Create aligns here (i.e., the place where the next
allocation will occur, and that the created word points to).
Likewise, the memory produced by allocate starts at an aligned
address. Adding a number of cells to an aligned address produces
another aligned address.
However, address arithmetic involving char+ and chars can
create an address that is not cell-aligned. Aligned ( addr --
a-addr ) produces the next aligned address:
v3 char+ aligned .s @ . v3 char+ .s @ .
Similarly, align advances here to the next aligned
address:
create v5 97 c, here . align here . 1000 ,
Note that you should use aligned addresses even if your processor does not require them, if you want your program to be portable.
Reference: section Address arithmetic.
This section gives a short introduction into how to use files inside Forth. It's broken up into five easy steps:
s" foo.in" r/o open-file throw Value fd-in
s" foo.out" w/o create-file throw Value fd-out
The available file modes are r/o for read-only access, r/w for
read-write access, and w/o for write-only access. You could open both
files with r/w, too, if you like. All file words return error codes; for
most applications, it's best to pass there error codes with throw
to the outer error handler.
If you want words for opening and assigning, define them as follows:
0 Value fd-in 0 Value fd-out : open-input ( addr u -- ) r/o open-file throw to fd-in ; : open-output ( addr u -- ) w/o create-file throw to fd-out ;
Usage example:
s" foo.in" open-input s" foo.out" open-output
256 Constant max-line
Create line-buffer max-line 2 + allot
: scan-file ( addr u -- )
begin
line-buffer max-line fd-in read-line throw
while
>r 2dup line-buffer r> compare 0=
until
else
drop
then
2drop ;
read-line ( addr u1 fd -- u2 flag ior ) reads up to u1 bytes into
the buffer at addr, and returns the number of bytes read, a flag that is
false when the end of file is reached, and an error code.
compare ( addr1 u1 addr2 u2 -- n ) compares two strings and
returns zero if both strings are equal. It returns a positive number if
the first string is lexically greater, a negative if the second string
is lexically greater.
We haven't seen this loop here; it has two exits. Since the while
exits with the number of bytes read on the stack, we have to clean up
that separately; that's after the else.
Usage example:
s" The text I search is here" scan-file
: copy-file ( -- )
begin
line-buffer max-line fd-in read-line throw
while
line-buffer swap fd-out write-file throw
repeat ;
fd-in close-file throw fd-out close-file throw
Likewise, you can put that into definitions, too:
: close-input ( -- ) fd-in close-file throw ; : close-output ( -- ) fd-out close-file throw ;
@assignment
How could you modify copy-file so that it copies until a second line is
matched? Can you write a program that extracts a section of a text file,
given the line that starts and the line that terminates that section?
@endassignment
When a word is compiled, it behaves differently from being interpreted.
E.g., consider +:
1 2 + . : foo + ;
These two behaviours are known as compilation and interpretation
semantics. For normal words (e.g., +), the compilation semantics
is to append the interpretation semantics to the currently defined word
(foo in the example above). I.e., when foo is executed
later, the interpretation semantics of + (i.e., adding two
numbers) will be performed.
However, there are words with non-default compilation semantics, e.g.,
the control-flow words like if. You can use immediate to
change the compilation semantics of the last defined word to be equal to
the interpretation semantics:
: [FOO] ( -- ) 5 . ; immediate [FOO] : bar ( -- ) [FOO] ; bar see bar
Two conventions to mark words with non-default compilation semnatics are names with brackets (more frequently used) and to write them all in upper case (less frequently used).
In Gforth (and many other systems) you can also remove the
interpretation semantics with compile-only (the compilation
semantics is derived from the original interpretation semantics):
: flip ( -- ) 6 . ; compile-only \ but not immediate flip : flop ( -- ) flip ; flop
In this example the interpretation semantics of flop is equal to
the original interpretation semantics of flip.
The text interpreter has two states: in interpret state, it performs the interpretation semantics of words it encounters; in compile state, it performs the compilation semantics of these words.
Among other things, : switches into compile state, and ;
switches back to interpret state. They contain the factors ]
(switch to compile state) and [ (switch to interpret state), that
do nothing but switch the state.
: xxx ( -- ) [ 5 . ] ; xxx see xxx
These brackets are also the source of the naming convention mentioned above.
Reference: section Interpretation and Compilation Semantics.
' word gives you the execution token (XT) of a word. The XT is a
cell representing the interpretation semantics of a word. You can
execute this semantics with execute:
' + .s 1 2 rot execute .
The XT is similar to a function pointer in C. However, parameter passing through the stack makes it a little more flexible:
: map-array ( ... addr u xt -- ... )
\ executes xt ( ... x -- ... ) for every element of the array starting
\ at addr and containing u elements
{ xt }
cells over + swap ?do
i @ xt execute
1 cells +loop ;
create a 3 , 4 , 2 , -1 , 4 ,
a 5 ' . map-array .s
0 a 5 ' + map-array .
s" max-n" environment? drop .s
a 5 ' min map-array .
You can use map-array with the XTs of words that consume one element more than they produce. In theory you can also use it with other XTs, but the stack effect then depends on the size of the array, which is hard to understand.
Since XTs are cell-sized, you can store them in memory and manipulate
them on the stack like other cells. You can also compile the XT into a
word with compile,:
: foo1 ( n1 n2 -- n ) [ ' + compile, ] ; see foo
This is non-standard, because compile, has no compilation
semantics in the standard, but it works in good Forth systems. For the
broken ones, use
: [compile,] compile, ; immediate : foo1 ( n1 n2 -- n ) [ ' + ] [compile,] ; see foo
' is a word with default compilation semantics; it parses the
next word when its interpretation semantics are executed, not during
compilation:
: foo ( -- xt ) ' ; see foo : bar ( ... "word" -- ... ) ' execute ; see bar 1 2 bar + .
You often want to parse a word during compilation and compile its XT so
it will be pushed on the stack at run-time. ['] does this:
: xt-+ ( -- xt ) ['] + ; see xt-+ 1 2 xt-+ execute .
Many programmers tend to see ' and the word it parses as one
unit, and expect it to behave like ['] when compiled, and are
confused by the actual behaviour. If you are, just remember that the
Forth system just takes ' as one unit and has no idea that it is
a parsing word (attempts to convenience programmers in this issue have
usually resulted in even worse pitfalls, see
State-smartness--Why it is evil and How to Exorcise it).
Note that the state of the interpreter does not come into play when
creating and executing XTs. I.e., even when you execute ' in
compile state, it still gives you the interpretation semantics. And
whatever that state is, execute performs the semantics
represented by the XT (i.e., for XTs produced with ' the
interpretation semantics).
Reference: section Tokens for Words.
throw ( n -- ) causes an exception unless n is zero.
100 throw .s 0 throw .s
catch ( ... xt -- ... n ) behaves similar to execute, but
it catches exceptions and pushes the number of the exception on the
stack (or 0, if the xt executed without exception). If there was an
exception, the stacks have the same depth as when entering catch:
.s 3 0 ' / catch .s 3 2 ' / catch .s
@assignment
Try the same with execute instead of catch.
@endassignment
Throw always jumps to the dynamically next enclosing
catch, even if it has to leave several call levels to achieve
this:
: foo 100 throw ; : foo1 foo ." after foo" ; : bar ['] foo1 catch ; bar .
It is often important to restore a value upon leaving a definition, even if the definition is left through an exception. You can ensure this like this:
: ... save-x ['] word-changing-x catch ( ... n ) restore-x ( ... n ) throw ;
Gforth provides an alternative syntax in addition to catch:
try ... recover ... endtry. If the code between try and
recover has an exception, the stack depths are restored, the
exception number is pushed on the stack, and the code between
recover and endtry is performed. E.g., the definition for
catch is
: catch ( x1 .. xn xt -- y1 .. ym 0 / z1 .. zn error ) \ exception
try
execute 0
recover
nip
endtry ;
The equivalent to the restoration code above is
: ...
save-x
try
word-changing-x 0
recover endtry
restore-x
throw ;
This works if word-changing-x does not change the stack depth,
otherwise you should add some code between recover and
endtry to balance the stack.
Reference: section Exception Handling.
:, create, and variable are definition words: They
define other words. Constant is another definition word:
5 constant foo foo .
You can also use the prefixes 2 (double-cell) and f
(floating point) with variable and constant.
You can also define your own defining words. E.g.:
: variable ( "name" -- ) create 0 , ;
You can also define defining words that create words that do something other than just producing their address:
: constant ( n "name" -- ) create , does> ( -- n ) ( addr ) @ ; 5 constant foo foo .
The definition of constant above ends at the does>; i.e.,
does> replaces ;, but it also does something else: It
changes the last defined word such that it pushes the address of the
body of the word and then performs the code after the does>
whenever it is called.
In the example above, constant uses , to store 5 into the
body of foo. When foo executes, it pushes the address of
the body onto the stack, then (in the code after the does>)
fetches the 5 from there.
The stack comment near the does> reflects the stack effect of the
defined word, not the stack effect of the code after the does>
(the difference is that the code expects the address of the body that
the stack comment does not show).
You can use these definition words to do factoring in cases that involve (other) definition words. E.g., a field offset is always added to an address. Instead of defining
2 cells constant offset-field1
and using this like
( addr ) offset-field1 +
you can define a definition word
: simple-field ( n "name" -- ) create , does> ( n1 -- n1+n ) ( addr ) @ + ;
Definition and use of field offsets now look like this:
2 cells simple-field field1 create mystruct 4 cells allot mystruct .s field1 .s drop
If you want to do something with the word without performing the code
after the does>, you can access the body of a created word
with >body ( xt -- addr ):
: value ( n "name" -- ) create , does> ( -- n1 ) @ ; : to ( n "name" -- ) ' >body ! ; 5 value foo foo . 7 to foo foo .
@assignment
Define defer ( "name" -- ), which creates a word that stores an
XT (at the start the XT of abort), and upon execution
executes the XT. Define is ( xt "name" -- ) that stores
xt into name, a word defined with defer. Indirect
recursion is one application of defer.
@endassignment
Reference: section User-defined Defining Words.
Forth has no standard words for defining data structures such as arrays and records (structs in C terminology), but you can build them yourself based on address arithmetic. You can also define words for defining arrays and records (see section Defining Words).
One of the first projects a Forth newcomer sets out upon when learning about defining words is an array defining word (possibly for n-dimensional arrays). Go ahead and do it, I did it, too; you will learn something from it. However, don't be disappointed when you later learn that you have little use for these words (inappropriate use would be even worse). I have not yet found a set of useful array words yet; the needs are just too diverse, and named, global arrays (the result of naive use of defining words) are often not flexible enough (e.g., consider how to pass them as parameters). Another such project is a set of words to help dealing with strings.
On the other hand, there is a useful set of record words, and it has
been defined in `compat/struct.fs'; these words are predefined in
Gforth. They are explained in depth elsewhere in this manual (see
see section Structures). The simple-field example above is
simplified variant of fields in this package.
POSTPONE
You can compile the compilation semantics (instead of compiling the
interpretation semantics) of a word with POSTPONE:
: MY-+ ( Compilation: -- ; Run-time of compiled code: n1 n2 -- n ) POSTPONE + ; immediate : foo ( n1 n2 -- n ) MY-+ ; 1 2 foo . see foo
During the definition of foo the text interpreter performs the
compilation semantics of MY-+, which performs the compilation
semantics of +, i.e., it compiles + into foo.
This example also displays separate stack comments for the compilation
semantics and for the stack effect of the compiled code. For words with
default compilation semantics these stack effects are usually not
displayed; the stack effect of the compilation semantics is always
( -- ) for these words, the stack effect for the compiled code is
the stack effect of the interpretation semantics.
Note that the state of the interpreter does not come into play when performing the compilation semantics in this way. You can also perform it interpretively, e.g.:
: foo2 ( n1 n2 -- n ) [ MY-+ ] ; 1 2 foo . see foo
However, there are some broken Forth systems where this does not always work, and therefore this practice was been declared non-standard in 1999.
Here is another example for using POSTPONE:
: MY-- ( Compilation: -- ; Run-time of compiled code: n1 n2 -- n ) POSTPONE negate POSTPONE + ; immediate compile-only : bar ( n1 n2 -- n ) MY-- ; 2 1 bar . see bar
You can define ENDIF in this way:
: ENDIF ( Compilation: orig -- ) POSTPONE then ; immediate
@assignment
Write MY-2DUP that has compilation semantics equivalent to
2dup, but compiles over over.
@endassignment
Literal
You cannot POSTPONE numbers:
: [FOO] POSTPONE 500 ; immediate
Instead, you can use LITERAL (compilation: n --; run-time: -- n ):
: [FOO] ( compilation: --; run-time: -- n ) 500 POSTPONE literal ; immediate : flip [FOO] ; flip . see flip
LITERAL consumes a number at compile-time (when it's compilation
semantics are executed) and pushes it at run-time (when the code it
compiled is executed). A frequent use of LITERAL is to compile a
number computed at compile time into the current word:
: bar ( -- n ) [ 2 2 + ] literal ; see bar
@assignment
Write ]L which allows writing the example above as : bar (
-- n ) [ 2 2 + ]L ;
@endassignment
Reconsider map-array from section Execution Tokens. It frequently performs execute, a relatively
expensive operation in some Forth implementations. You can use
compile, and POSTPONE to eliminate these executes
and produce a word that contains the word to be performed directly:
: compile-map-array ( compilation: xt -- ; run-time: ... addr u -- ... )
\ at run-time, execute xt ( ... x -- ... ) for each element of the
\ array beginning at addr and containing u elements
{ xt }
POSTPONE cells POSTPONE over POSTPONE + POSTPONE swap POSTPONE ?do
POSTPONE i POSTPONE @ xt compile,
1 cells POSTPONE literal POSTPONE +loop ;
: sum-array ( addr u -- n )
0 rot rot [ ' + compile-map-array ] ;
see sum-array
a 5 sum-array .
You can use the full power of Forth for generating the code; here's an example where the code is generated in a loop:
: compile-vmul-step ( compilation: n --; run-time: n1 addr1 -- n2 addr2 ) \ n2=n1+(addr1)*n, addr2=addr1+cell POSTPONE tuck POSTPONE @ POSTPONE literal POSTPONE * POSTPONE + POSTPONE swap POSTPONE cell+ ; : compile-vmul ( compilation: addr1 u -- ; run-time: addr2 -- n ) \ n=v1*v2 (inner product), where the v_i are represented as addr_i u 0 postpone literal postpone swap [ ' compile-vmul-step compile-map-array ] postpone drop ; see compile-vmul : a-vmul ( addr -- n ) \ n=a*v, where v is a vector that's as long as a and starts at addr [ a 5 compile-vmul ] ; see a-vmul a a-vmul .
This example uses compile-map-array to show off, but you could
also use map-array instead (try it now!).
You can use this technique for efficient multiplication of large matrices. In matrix multiplication, you multiply every line of one matrix with every column of the other matrix. You can generate the code for one line once, and use it for every column. The only downside of this technique is that it is cumbersome to recover the memory consumed by the generated code when you are done (and in more complicated cases it is not possible portably).
This section is Gforth-specific. You can skip it.
' word compile, compiles the interpretation semantics. For words
with default compilation semantics this is the same as performing the
compilation semantics. To represent the compilation semantics of other
words (e.g., words like if that have no interpretation
semantics), Gforth has the concept of a compilation token (CT,
consisting of two cells), and words comp' and [comp'].
You can perform the compilation semantics represented by a CT with
execute:
: foo2 ( n1 n2 -- n ) [ comp' + execute ] ; see foo
You can compile the compilation semantics represented by a CT with
postpone,:
: foo3 ( -- ) [ comp' + postpone, ] ; see foo3
[ comp' word postpone, ] is equivalent to POSTPONE word.
comp' is particularly useful for words that have no
interpretation semantics:
' if comp' if .s 2drop
Reference: section Tokens for Words.
The dictionary is not just a memory area that allows you to allocate
memory with allot, it also contains the Forth words, arranged in
several wordlists. When searching for a word in a wordlist,
conceptually you start searching at the youngest and proceed towards
older words (in reality most systems nowadays use hash-tables); i.e., if
you define a word with the same name as an older word, the new word
shadows the older word.
Which wordlists are searched in which order is determined by the search
order. You can display the search order with order. It displays
first the search order, starting with the wordlist searched first, then
it displays the wordlist that will contain newly defined words.
You can create a new, empty wordlist with wordlist ( -- wid ):
wordlist constant mywords
Set-current ( wid -- ) sets the wordlist that will contain newly
defined words (the current wordlist):
mywords set-current order
Gforth does not display a name for the wordlist in mywords
because this wordlist was created anonymously with wordlist.
You can get the current wordlist with get-current ( -- wid). If
you want to put something into a specific wordlist without overall
effect on the current wordlist, this typically looks like this:
get-current mywords set-current ( wid ) create someword ( wid ) set-current
You can write the search order with set-order ( wid1 .. widn n --
) and read it with get-order ( -- wid1 .. widn n ). The first
searched wordlist is topmost.
get-order mywords swap 1+ set-order order
Yes, the order of wordlists in the output of order is reversed
from stack comments and the output of .s and thus unintuitive.
@assignment
Define >order ( wid -- ) with adds wid as first searched
wordlist to the search order. Define previous ( -- ), which
removes the first searched wordlist from the search order. Experiment
with boundary conditions (you will see some crashes or situations that
are hard or impossible to leave).
@endassignment
The search order is a powerful foundation for providing features similar to Modula-2 modules and C++ namespaces. However, trying to modularize programs in this way has disadvantages for debugging and reuse/factoring that overcome the advantages in my experience (I don't do huge projects, though). These disadvantages are not so clear in other languages/programming environments, because these languages are not so strong in debugging and reuse.
Reference: section Word Lists.
The difference of this chapter from the Tutorial (see section Forth Tutorial) is that it is slower-paced in its examples, but uses them to dive deep into explaining Forth internals (not covered by the Tutorial). Apart from that, this chapter covers far less material. It is suitable for reading without using a computer.
The primary purpose of this manual is to document Gforth. However, since Forth is not a widely-known language and there is a lack of up-to-date teaching material, it seems worthwhile to provide some introductory material. For other sources of Forth-related information, see section Other Forth-related information.
The examples in this section should work on any ANS Forth; the
output shown was produced using Gforth. Each example attempts to
reproduce the exact output that Gforth produces. If you try out the
examples (and you should), what you should type is shown like this
and Gforth's response is shown like this. The single exception is
that, where the example shows RET it means that you should
press the "carriage return" key. Unfortunately, some output formats for
this manual cannot show the difference between this and
this which will make trying out the examples harder (but not
impossible).
Forth is an unusual language. It provides an interactive development environment which includes both an interpreter and compiler. Forth programming style encourages you to break a problem down into many small fragments (factoring), and then to develop and test each fragment interactively. Forth advocates assert that breaking the edit-compile-test cycle used by conventional programming languages can lead to great productivity improvements.
When you invoke the Forth image, you will see a startup banner printed and nothing else (if you have Gforth installed on your system, try invoking it now, by typing gforthRET). Forth is now running its command line interpreter, which is called the Text Interpreter (also known as the Outer Interpreter). (You will learn a lot about the text interpreter as you read through this chapter, for more detail see section The Text Interpreter).
Although it's not obvious, Forth is actually waiting for your input. Type a number and press the RET key:
45RET ok
Rather than give you a prompt to invite you to input something, the text
interpreter prints a status message after it has processed a line
of input. The status message in this case (" ok" followed by
carriage-return) indicates that the text interpreter was able to process
all of your input successfully. Now type something illegal:
qwer341RET :1: Undefined word qwer341 ^^^^^^^ $400D2BA8 Bounce $400DBDA8 no.extensions
The exact text, other than the "Undefined word" may differ slightly on your system, but the effect is the same; when the text interpreter detects an error, it discards any remaining text on a line, resets certain internal state and prints an error message. For a detailed description of error messages see section Error messages.
The text interpreter waits for you to press carriage-return, and then processes your input line. Starting at the beginning of the line, it breaks the line into groups of characters separated by spaces. For each group of characters in turn, it makes two attempts to do something:
If the text interpreter is unable to do either of these things with any
group of characters, it discards the group of characters and the rest of
the line, then prints an error message. If the text interpreter reaches
the end of the line without error, it prints the status message " ok"
followed by carriage-return.
This is the simplest command we can give to the text interpreter:
RET ok
The text interpreter did everything we asked it to do (nothing) without
an error, so it said that everything is " ok". Try a slightly longer
command:
12 dup fred dupRET
:1: Undefined word
12 dup fred dup
^^^^
$400D2BA8 Bounce
$400DBDA8 no.extensions
When you press the carriage-return key, the text interpreter starts to work its way along the line:
2, it takes the group of
characters 12 and looks them up in the name
dictionary(5). There is no match for this group of characters
in the name dictionary, so it tries to treat them as a number. It is
able to do this successfully, so it puts the number, 12, "on the stack"
(whatever that means).
dup. It looks it up in the name dictionary and
(you'll have to take my word for this) finds it, and executes the word
dup (whatever that means).
fred. It looks them up in the name
dictionary, but can't find them. It tries to treat them as a number, but
they don't represent any legal number.
At this point, the text interpreter gives up and prints an error
message. The error message shows exactly how far the text interpreter
got in processing the line. In particular, it shows that the text
interpreter made no attempt to do anything with the final character
group, dup, even though we have good reason to believe that the
text interpreter would have no problem looking that word up and
executing it a second time.
In procedural programming languages (like C and Pascal), the building-block of programs is the function or procedure. These functions or procedures are called with explicit parameters. For example, in C we might write:
total = total + new_volume(length,height,depth);
where new_volume is a function-call to another piece of code, and total, length, height and depth are all variables. length, height and depth are parameters to the function-call.
In Forth, the equivalent of the function or procedure is the definition and parameters are implicitly passed between definitions using a shared stack that is visible to the programmer. Although Forth does support variables, the existence of the stack means that they are used far less often than in most other programming languages. When the text interpreter encounters a number, it will place (push) it on the stack. There are several stacks (the actual number is implementation-dependent ...) and the particular stack used for any operation is implied unambiguously by the operation being performed. The stack used for all integer operations is called the data stack and, since this is the stack used most commonly, references to "the data stack" are often abbreviated to "the stack".
The stacks have a last-in, first-out (LIFO) organisation. If you type:
1 2 3RET ok
Then this instructs the text interpreter to placed three numbers on the (data) stack. An analogy for the behaviour of the stack is to take a pack of playing cards and deal out the ace (1), 2 and 3 into a pile on the table. The 3 was the last card onto the pile ("last-in") and if you take a card off the pile then, unless you're prepared to fiddle a bit, the card that you take off will be the 3 ("first-out"). The number that will be first-out of the stack is called the top of stack, which is often abbreviated to TOS.
To understand how parameters are passed in Forth, consider the
behaviour of the definition + (pronounced "plus"). You will not
be surprised to learn that this definition performs addition. More
precisely, it adds two number together and produces a result. Where does
it get the two numbers from? It takes the top two numbers off the
stack. Where does it place the result? On the stack. You can act-out the
behaviour of + with your playing cards like this:
If you don't have a pack of cards handy but you do have Forth running,
you can use the definition .s to show the current state of the stack,
without affecting the stack. Type:
clearstack 1 2 3RET ok .sRET <3> 1 2 3 ok
The text interpreter looks up the word clearstack and executes
it; it tidies up the stack and removes any entries that may have been
left on it by earlier examples. The text interpreter pushes each of the
three numbers in turn onto the stack. Finally, the text interpreter
looks up the word .s and executes it. The effect of executing
.s is to print the "<3>" (the total number of items on the stack)
followed by a list of all the items on the stack; the item on the far
right-hand side is the TOS.
You can now type:
+ .sRET <2> 1 5 ok
which is correct; there are now 2 items on the stack and the result of the addition is 5.
If you're playing with cards, try doing a second addition: pick up the two cards, work out that their sum is 6, shuffle them into the pack, look for a 6 and place that on the table. You now have just one item on the stack. What happens if you try to do a third addition? Pick up the first card, pick up the second card -- ah! There is no second card. This is called a stack underflow and consitutes an error. If you try to do the same thing with Forth it often reports an error (probably a Stack Underflow or an Invalid Memory Address error).
The opposite situation to a stack underflow is a stack overflow, which simply accepts that there is a finite amount of storage space reserved for the stack. To stretch the playing card analogy, if you had enough packs of cards and you piled the cards up on the table, you would eventually be unable to add another card; you'd hit the ceiling. Gforth allows you to set the maximum size of the stacks. In general, the only time that you will get a stack overflow is because a definition has a bug in it and is generating data on the stack uncontrollably.
There's one final use for the playing card analogy. If you model your stack using a pack of playing cards, the maximum number of items on your stack will be 52 (I assume you didn't use the Joker). The maximum value of any item on the stack is 13 (the King). In fact, the only possible numbers are positive integer numbers 1 through 13; you can't have (for example) 0 or 27 or 3.52 or -2. If you change the way you think about some of the cards, you can accommodate different numbers. For example, you could think of the Jack as representing 0, the Queen as representing -1 and the King as representing -2. Your range remains unchanged (you can still only represent a total of 13 numbers) but the numbers that you can represent are -2 through 10.
In that analogy, the limit was the amount of information that a single stack entry could hold, and Forth has a similar limit. In Forth, the size of a stack entry is called a cell. The actual size of a cell is implementation dependent and affects the maximum value that a stack entry can hold. A Standard Forth provides a cell size of at least 16-bits, and most desktop systems use a cell size of 32-bits.
Forth does not do any type checking for you, so you are free to
manipulate and combine stack items in any way you wish. A convenient way
of treating stack items is as 2's complement signed integers, and that
is what Standard words like + do. Therefore you can type:
-5 12 + .sRET <1> 7 ok
If you use numbers and definitions like + in order to turn Forth
into a great big pocket calculator, you will realise that it's rather
different from a normal calculator. Rather than typing 2 + 3 = you had
to type 2 3 + (ignore the fact that you had to use .s to see the
result). The terminology used to describe this difference is to say that
your calculator uses Infix Notation (parameters and operators are
mixed) whilst Forth uses Postfix Notation (parameters and
operators are separate), also called Reverse Polish Notation.
Whilst postfix notation might look confusing to begin with, it has several important advantages:
To examine these claims in more detail, consider these sums:
6 + 5 * 4 = 4 * 5 + 6 =
If you're just learning maths or your maths is very rusty, you will probably come up with the answer 44 for the first and 26 for the second. If you are a bit of a whizz at maths you will remember the convention that multiplication takes precendence over addition, and you'd come up with the answer 26 both times. To explain the answer 26 to someone who got the answer 44, you'd probably rewrite the first sum like this:
6 + (5 * 4) =
If what you really wanted was to perform the addition before the multiplication, you would have to use parentheses to force it.
If you did the first two sums on a pocket calculator you would probably get the right answers, unless you were very cautious and entered them using these keystroke sequences:
6 + 5 = * 4 = 4 * 5 = + 6 =
Postfix notation is unambiguous because the order that the operators are applied is always explicit; that also means that parentheses are never required. The operators are active (the act of quoting the operator makes the operation occur) which removes the need for "=".
The sum 6 + 5 * 4 can be written (in postfix notation) in two equivalent ways:
6 5 4 * + or: 5 4 * 6 +
An important thing that you should notice about this notation is that
the order of the numbers does not change; if you want to subtract
2 from 10 you type 10 2 -.
The reason that Forth uses postfix notation is very simple to explain: it makes the implementation extremely simple, and it follows naturally from using the stack as a mechanism for passing parameters. Another way of thinking about this is to realise that all Forth definitions are active; they execute as they are encountered by the text interpreter. The result of this is that the syntax of Forth is trivially simple.
Until now, the examples we've seen have been trivial; we've just been using Forth as a bigger-than-pocket calculator. Also, each calculation we've shown has been a "one-off" -- to repeat it we'd need to type it in again(6) In this section we'll see how to add new words to Forth's vocabulary.
The easiest way to create a new word is to use a colon definition. We'll define a few and try them out before worrying too much about how they work. Try typing in these examples; be careful to copy the spaces accurately:
: add-two 2 + . ; : greet ." Hello and welcome" ; : demo 5 add-two ;
Now try them out:
greetRET Hello and welcome ok greet greetRET Hello and welcomeHello and welcome ok 4 add-twoRET 6 ok demoRET 7 ok 9 greet demo add-twoRET Hello and welcome7 11 ok
The first new thing that we've introduced here is the pair of words
: and ;. These are used to start and terminate a new
definition, respectively. The first word after the : is the name
for the new definition.
As you can see from the examples, a definition is built up of words that have already been defined; Forth makes no distinction between definitions that existed when you started the system up, and those that you define yourself.
The examples also introduce the words . (dot), ."
(dot-quote) and dup (dewp). Dot takes the value from the top of
the stack and displays it. It's like .s except that it only
displays the top item of the stack and it is destructive; after it has
executed, the number is no longer on the stack. There is always one
space printed after the number, and no spaces before it. Dot-quote
defines a string (a sequence of characters) that will be printed when
the word is executed. The string can contain any printable characters
except ". A " has a special function; it is not a Forth
word but it acts as a delimiter (the way that delimiters work is
described in the next section). Finally, dup duplicates the value
at the top of the stack. Try typing 5 dup .s to see what it does.
We already know that the text interpreter searches through the
dictionary to locate names. If you've followed the examples earlier, you
will already have a definition called add-two. Lets try modifying
it by typing in a new definition:
: add-two dup . ." + 2 =" 2 + . ;RET redefined add-two ok
Forth recognised that we were defining a word that already exists, and printed a message to warn us of that fact. Let's try out the new definition:
9 add-twoRET 9 + 2 =11 ok
All that we've actually done here, though, is to create a new
definition, with a particular name. The fact that there was already a
definition with the same name did not make any difference to the way
that the new definition was created (except that Forth printed a warning
message). The old definition of add-two still exists (try demo
again to see that this is true). Any new definition will use the new
definition of add-two, but old definitions continue to use the
version that already existed at the time that they were compiled.
Before you go on to the next section, try defining and redefining some words of your own.
Now we're going to take another look at the definition of add-two
from the previous section. From our knowledge of the way that the text
interpreter works, we would have expected this result when we tried to
define add-two:
: add-two 2 + . ;RET ^^^^^^^ Error: Undefined word
The reason that this didn't happen is bound up in the way that :
works. The word : does two special things. The first special
thing that it does prevents the text interpreter from ever seeing the
characters add-two. The text interpreter uses a variable called
>IN (pronounced "to-in") to keep track of where it is in the
input line. When it encounters the word : it behaves in exactly
the same way as it does for any other word; it looks it up in the name
dictionary, finds its xt and executes it. When : executes, it
looks at the input buffer, finds the word add-two and advances the
value of >IN to point past it. It then does some other stuff
associated with creating the new definition (including creating an entry
for add-two in the name dictionary). When the execution of :
completes, control returns to the text interpreter, which is oblivious
to the fact that it has been tricked into ignoring part of the input
line.
Words like : -- words that advance the value of >IN and so
prevent the text interpreter from acting on the whole of the input line
-- are called parsing words.
The second special thing that : does is change the value of a
variable called state, which affects the way that the text
interpreter behaves. When Gforth starts up, state has the value
0, and the text interpreter is said to be interpreting. During a
colon definition (started with :), state is set to -1 and
the text interpreter is said to be compiling.
In this example, the text interpreter is compiling when it processes the
string "2 + . ;". It still breaks the string down into
character sequences in the same way. However, instead of pushing the
number 2 onto the stack, it lays down (compiles) some magic
into the definition of add-two that will make the number 2 get
pushed onto the stack when add-two is executed. Similarly,
the behaviours of + and . are also compiled into the
definition.
One category of words don't get compiled. These so-called immediate
words get executed (performed now) regardless of whether the text
interpreter is interpreting or compiling. The word ; is an
immediate word. Rather than being compiled into the definition, it
executes. Its effect is to terminate the current definition, which
includes changing the value of state back to 0.
When you execute add-two, it has a run-time effect that is
exactly the same as if you had typed 2 + . RET outside of a
definition.
In Forth, every word or number can be described in terms of two properties:
Numbers are always treated in a fixed way:
Words don't behave in such a regular way, but most have default semantics which means that they behave like this:
The actual behaviour of any particular word can be controlled by using
the words immediate and compile-only when the word is
defined. These words set flags in the name dictionary entry of the most
recently defined word, and these flags are retrieved by the text
interpreter when it finds the word in the name dictionary.
A word that is marked as immediate has compilation semantics that are identical to its interpretation semantics. In other words, it behaves like this:
Marking a word as compile-only prohibits the text interpreter from
performing the interpretation semantics of the word directly; an attempt
to do so will generate an error. It is never necessary to use
compile-only (and it is not even part of ANS Forth, though it is
provided by many implementations) but it is good etiquette to apply it
to a word that will not behave correctly (and might have unexpected
side-effects) in interpret state. For example, it is only legal to use
the conditional word IF within a definition. If you forget this
and try to use it elsewhere, the fact that (in Gforth) it is marked as
compile-only allows the text interpreter to generate a helpful
error message rather than subjecting you to the consequences of your
folly.
This example shows the difference between an immediate and a non-immediate word:
: show-state state @ . ; : show-state-now show-state ; immediate : word1 show-state ; : word2 show-state-now ;
The word immediate after the definition of show-state-now
makes that word an immediate word. These definitions introduce a new
word: @ (pronounced "fetch"). This word fetches the value of a
variable, and leaves it on the stack. Therefore, the behaviour of
show-state is to print a number that represents the current value
of state.
When you execute word1, it prints the number 0, indicating that
the system is interpreting. When the text interpreter compiled the
definition of word1, it encountered show-state whose
compilation semantics are to append its interpretation semantics to the
current definition. When you execute word1, it performs the
interpretation semantics of show-state. At the time that word1
(and therefore show-state) are executed, the system is
interpreting.
When you pressed RET after entering the definition of word2,
you should have seen the number -1 printed, followed by "
ok". When the text interpreter compiled the definition of
word2, it encountered show-state-now, an immediate word,
whose compilation semantics are therefore to perform its interpretation
semantics. It is executed straight away (even before the text
interpreter has moved on to process another group of characters; the
; in this example). The effect of executing it are to display the
value of state at the time that the definition of
word2 is being defined. Printing -1 demonstrates that the
system is compiling at this time. If you execute word2 it does
nothing at all.
Before leaving the subject of immediate words, consider the behaviour of
." in the definition of greet, in the previous
section. This word is both a parsing word and an immediate word. Notice
that there is a space between ." and the start of the text
Hello and welcome, but that there is no space between the last
letter of welcome and the " character. The reason for this
is that ." is a Forth word; it must have a space after it so that
the text interpreter can identify it. The " is not a Forth word;
it is a delimiter. The examples earlier show that, when the string
is displayed, there is neither a space before the H nor after the
e. Since ." is an immediate word, it executes at the time
that greet is defined. When it executes, its behaviour is to
search forward in the input line looking for the delimiter. When it
finds the delimiter, it updates >IN to point past the
delimiter. It also compiles some magic code into the definition of
greet; the xt of a run-time routine that prints a text string. It
compiles the string Hello and welcome into memory so that it is
available to be printed later. When the text interpreter gains control,
the next word it finds in the input stream is ; and so it
terminates the definition of greet.
When you start up a Forth compiler, a large number of definitions already exist. In Forth, you develop a new application using bottom-up programming techniques to create new definitions that are defined in terms of existing definitions. As you create each definition you can test and debug it interactively.
If you have tried out the examples in this section, you will probably
have typed them in by hand; when you leave Gforth, your definitions will
be lost. You can avoid this by using a text editor to enter Forth source
code into a file, and then loading code from the file using
include (see section Forth source files). A Forth source file is
processed by the text interpreter, just as though you had typed it in by
hand(7).
Gforth also supports the traditional Forth alternative to using text files for program entry (see section Blocks).
In common with many, if not most, Forth compilers, most of Gforth is actually written in Forth. All of the `.fs' files in the installation directory(8) are Forth source files, which you can study to see examples of Forth programming.
Gforth maintains a history file that records every line that you type to the text interpreter. This file is preserved between sessions, and is used to provide a command-line recall facility. If you enter long definitions by hand, you can use a text editor to paste them out of the history file into a Forth source file for reuse at a later time (for more information see section Command-line editing).
To summarise this chapter:
state to select between
the use of the interpretation semantics and the compilation
semantics of a word that it encounters.
Amazing as it may seem, if you have read (and understood) this far, you know almost all the fundamentals about the inner workings of a Forth system. You certainly know enough to be able to read and understand the rest of this manual and the ANS Forth document, to learn more about the facilities that Forth in general and Gforth in particular provide. Even scarier, you know almost enough to implement your own Forth system. However, that's not a good idea just yet... better to try writing some programs in Gforth.
Forth has such a rich vocabulary that it can be hard to know where to start in learning it. This section suggests a few sets of words that are enough to write small but useful programs. Use the word index in this document to learn more about each word, then try it out and try to write small definitions using it. Start by experimenting with these words:
+ - * / /MOD */ ABS INVERT
MIN MAX =
AND OR XOR NOT
DUP DROP SWAP OVER
IF ELSE ENDIF ?DO I LOOP
. ." EMIT CR KEY
: ; CREATE
ALLOT ,
SEE WORDS .S MARKER
When you have mastered those, go on to:
VARIABLE CONSTANT VALUE TO CREATE DOES>
@ !
When you have mastered these, there's nothing for it but to read through the whole of this manual and find out what you've missed.
TODO: provide a set of programming excercises linked into the stuff done already and into other sections of the manual. Provide solutions to all the exercises in a .fs file in the distribution.
The Forth words are described in this section in the glossary notation that has become a de-facto standard for Forth texts:
word Stack effect wordset pronunciation
Description
before --
after, where before and after describe the top of
stack entries before and after the execution of the word. The rest of
the stack is not touched by the word. The top of stack is rightmost,
i.e., a stack sequence is written as it is typed in. Note that Gforth
uses a separate floating point stack, but a unified stack
notation. Also, return stack effects are not shown in stack
effect, but in Description. The name of a stack item describes
the type and/or the function of the item. See below for a discussion of
the types.
All words have two stack effects: A compile-time stack effect and a
run-time stack effect. The compile-time stack-effect of most words is
-- . If the compile-time stack-effect of a word deviates from
this standard behaviour, or the word does other unusual things at
compile time, both stack effects are shown; otherwise only the run-time
stack effect is shown.
gforth or gforth-internal as word set. gforth
describes words that will work in future releases of Gforth;
gforth-internal words are more volatile. Environmental query
strings are also displayed like words; you can recognize them by the
environment in the word set field.
The type of a stack item is specified by the character(s) the name starts with:
f
false or true.
c
w
n
u
d
ud
r
a-
c-
f-
df-
sf-
xt
wid
ior, wior
throw iors.
f83name
"
<>
quotes.
Gforth is case-insensitive; you can enter definitions and invoke Standard words using upper, lower or mixed case (however, see section Implementation Defined Options).
ANS Forth only requires implementations to recognise Standard words when they are typed entirely in upper case. Therefore, a Standard program must use upper case for all Standard words. You can use whatever case you like for words that you define, but in a Standard program you have to use the words in the same case that you defined them.
Gforth supports case sensitivity through tables (case-sensitive
wordlists, see section Word Lists).
Two people have asked how to convert Gforth to be case-sensitive; while we think this is a bad idea, you can change all wordlists into tables like this:
' table-find forth-wordlist wordlist-map !
Note that you now have to type the predefined words in the same case that we defined them, which are varying. You may want to convert them to your favourite case before doing this operation (I won't explain how, because if you are even contemplating doing this, you'd better have enough knowledge of Forth systems to know this already).
Forth supports two styles of comment; the traditional in-line comment,
( and its modern cousin, the comment to end of line; \.
( compilation 'ccc<close-paren>' -- ; run-time -- core,file ``paren''
Comment, usually till the next ): parse and discard all
subsequent characters in the parse area until ")" is
encountered. During interactive input, an end-of-line also acts as
a comment terminator. For file input, it does not; if the
end-of-file is encountered whilst parsing for the ")" delimiter,
Gforth will generate a warning.
\ compilation 'ccc<newline>' -- ; run-time -- core-ext,block-ext ``backslash''
Comment till the end of the line if BLK contains 0 (i.e.,
while not loading a block), parse and discard the remainder of the
parse area. Otherwise, parse and discard all subsequent characters
in the parse area corresponding to the current line.
\G compilation 'ccc<newline>' -- ; run-time -- gforth ``backslash-gee''
Equivalent to \ but used as a tag to annotate definition
comments into documentation.
A Boolean flag is cell-sized. A cell with all bits clear represents the
flag false and a flag with all bits set represents the flag
true. Words that check a flag (for example, IF) will treat
a cell that has any bit set as true.
true -- f core-ext ``true''
Constant -- f is a cell with all bits set.
false -- f core-ext ``false''
Constant -- f is a cell with all bits clear.
on a-addr -- gforth ``on''
Set the (value of the) variable at a-addr to true.
off a-addr -- gforth ``off''
Set the (value of the) variable at a-addr to false.
Forth arithmetic is not checked, i.e., you will not hear about integer
overflow on addition or multiplication, you may hear about division by
zero if you are lucky. The operator is written after the operands, but
the operands are still in the original order. I.e., the infix 2-1
corresponds to 2 1 -. Forth offers a variety of division
operators. If you perform division with potentially negative operands,
you do not want to use / or /mod with its undefined
behaviour, but rather fm/mod or sm/mod (probably the
former, see section Mixed precision).
By default, numbers in Forth are single-precision integers that are one cell in size. They can be signed or unsigned, depending upon how you treat them. For the rules used by the text interpreter for recognising single-precision integers see section Number Conversion.
These words are all defined for signed operands, but some of them also
work for unsigned numbers: +, 1+, -, 1-,
*.
+ n1 n2 -- n core ``plus''
1+ n1 -- n2 core ``one-plus''
- n1 n2 -- n core ``minus''
1- n1 -- n2 core ``one-minus''
* n1 n2 -- n core ``star''
/ n1 n2 -- n core ``slash''
mod n1 n2 -- n core ``mod''
/mod n1 n2 -- n3 n4 core ``slash-mod''
negate n1 -- n2 core ``negate''
abs n -- u core ``abs''
min n1 n2 -- n core ``min''
max n1 n2 -- n core ``max''
FLOORED -- f environment ``FLOORED''
True if / etc. perform floored division
For the rules used by the text interpreter for recognising double-precision integers, see section Number Conversion.
A double precision number is represented by a cell pair, with the most
significant cell at the TOS. It is trivial to convert an unsigned single
to a double: simply push a 0 onto the TOS. Since numbers are
represented by Gforth using 2's complement arithmetic, converting a
signed single to a (signed) double requires sign-extension across the
most significant cell. This can be achieved using s>d. The moral
of the story is that you cannot convert a number without knowing whether
it represents an unsigned or a signed number.
These words are all defined for signed operands, but some of them also
work for unsigned numbers: d+, d-.
s>d n -- d core ``s-to-d''
d>s d -- n double ``d-to-s''
d+ d1 d2 -- d double ``d-plus''
d- d1 d2 -- d double ``d-minus''
dnegate d1 -- d2 double ``d-negate''
dabs d -- ud double ``d-abs''
dmin d1 d2 -- d double ``d-min''
dmax d1 d2 -- d double ``d-max''
and w1 w2 -- w core ``and''
or w1 w2 -- w core ``or''
xor w1 w2 -- w core ``x-or''
invert w1 -- w2 core ``invert''
lshift u1 n -- u2 core ``l-shift''
rshift u1 n -- u2 core ``r-shift''
Logical shift right by n bits.
2* n1 -- n2 core ``two-star''
Shift left by 1; also works on unsigned numbers
d2* d1 -- d2 double ``d-two-star''
Shift left by 1; also works on unsigned numbers
2/ n1 -- n2 core ``two-slash''
Arithmetic shift right by 1. For signed numbers this is a floored
division by 2 (note that / not necessarily floors).
d2/ d1 -- d2 double ``d-two-slash''
Arithmetic shift right by 1. For signed numbers this is a floored division by 2.
Note that the words that compare for equality (= <> 0= 0<> d= d<>
d0= d0<>) work for for both signed and unsigned numbers.
< n1 n2 -- f core ``less-than''
<= n1 n2 -- f gforth ``less-or-equal''
<> n1 n2 -- f core-ext ``not-equals''
= n1 n2 -- f core ``equals''
> n1 n2 -- f core ``greater-than''
>= n1 n2 -- f gforth ``greater-or-equal''
0< n -- f core ``zero-less-than''
0<= n -- f gforth ``zero-less-or-equal''
0<> n -- f core-ext ``zero-not-equals''
0= n -- f core ``zero-equals''
0> n -- f core-ext ``zero-greater-than''
0>= n -- f gforth ``zero-greater-or-equal''
u< u1 u2 -- f core ``u-less-than''
u<= u1 u2 -- f gforth ``u-less-or-equal''
u> u1 u2 -- f core-ext ``u-greater-than''
u>= u1 u2 -- f gforth ``u-greater-or-equal''
within u1 u2 u3 -- f core-ext ``within''
u2=<u1<u3 or: u3=<u2 and u1 is not in [u3,u2). This works for
unsigned and signed numbers (but not a mixture). Another way to think
about this word is to consider the numbers as a circle (wrapping
around from max-u to 0 for unsigned, and from max-n to
min-n for signed numbers); now consider the range from u2 towards
increasing numbers up to and excluding u3 (giving an empty range if
u2=u3); if u1 is in this range, within returns true.
d< d1 d2 -- f double ``d-less-than''
d<= d1 d2 -- f gforth ``d-less-or-equal''
d<> d1 d2 -- f gforth ``d-not-equals''
d= d1 d2 -- f double ``d-equals''
d> d1 d2 -- f gforth ``d-greater-than''
d>= d1 d2 -- f gforth ``d-greater-or-equal''
d0< d -- f double ``d-zero-less-than''
d0<= d -- f gforth ``d-zero-less-or-equal''
d0<> d -- f gforth ``d-zero-not-equals''
d0= d -- f double ``d-zero-equals''
d0> d -- f gforth ``d-zero-greater-than''
d0>= d -- f gforth ``d-zero-greater-or-equal''
du< ud1 ud2 -- f double-ext ``d-u-less-than''
du<= ud1 ud2 -- f gforth ``d-u-less-or-equal''
du> ud1 ud2 -- f gforth ``d-u-greater-than''
du>= ud1 ud2 -- f gforth ``d-u-greater-or-equal''
m+ d1 n -- d2 double ``m-plus''
*/ n1 n2 n3 -- n4 core ``star-slash''
n4=(n1*n2)/n3, with the intermediate result being double.
*/mod n1 n2 n3 -- n4 n5 core ``star-slash-mod''
n1*n2=n3*n5+n4, with the intermediate result (n1*n2) being double.
m* n1 n2 -- d core ``m-star''
um* u1 u2 -- ud core ``u-m-star''
m*/ d1 n2 u3 -- dquot double ``m-star-slash''
dquot=(d1*n2)/u3, with the intermediate result being triple-precision. In ANS Forth u3 can only be a positive signed number.
um/mod ud u1 -- u2 u3 core ``u-m-slash-mod''
ud=u3*u1+u2, u1>u2>=0
fm/mod d1 n1 -- n2 n3 core ``f-m-slash-mod''
Floored division: d1 = n3*n1+n2, n1>n2>=0 or 0>=n2>n1.
sm/rem d1 n1 -- n2 n3 core ``s-m-slash-rem''
Symmetric division: d1 = n3*n1+n2, sign(n2)=sign(d1) or 0.
For the rules used by the text interpreter for recognising floating-point numbers see section Number Conversion.
Gforth has a separate floating point stack, but the documentation uses the unified notation.(9)
Floating point numbers have a number of unpleasant surprises for the unwary (e.g., floating point addition is not associative) and even a few for the wary. You should not use them unless you know what you are doing or you don't care that the results you get are totally bogus. If you want to learn about the problems of floating point numbers (and how to avoid them), you might start with David Goldberg, What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic.
d>f d -- r float ``d-to-f''
f>d r -- d float ``f-to-d''
f+ r1 r2 -- r3 float ``f-plus''
f- r1 r2 -- r3 float ``f-minus''
f* r1 r2 -- r3 float ``f-star''
f/ r1 r2 -- r3 float ``f-slash''
fnegate r1 -- r2 float ``f-negate''
fabs r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-abs''
fmax r1 r2 -- r3 float ``f-max''
fmin r1 r2 -- r3 float ``f-min''
floor r1 -- r2 float ``floor''
Round towards the next smaller integral value, i.e., round toward negative infinity.
fround r1 -- r2 gforth ``f-round''
Round to the nearest integral value.
f** r1 r2 -- r3 float-ext ``f-star-star''
r3 is r1 raised to the r2th power.
fsqrt r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-square-root''
fexp r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-e-x-p''
fexpm1 r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-e-x-p-m-one''
r2=e**r1-1
fln r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-l-n''
flnp1 r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-l-n-p-one''
r2=ln(r1+1)
flog r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-log''
The decimal logarithm.
falog r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-a-log''
r2=10**r1
f2* r1 -- r2 gforth ``f2*''
Multiply r1 by 2.0e0
f2/ r1 -- r2 gforth ``f2/''
Multiply r1 by 0.5e0
1/f r1 -- r2 gforth ``1/f''
Divide 1.0e0 by r1.
precision -- u float-ext ``precision''
u is the number of significant digits currently used by
F. FE. and FS.
set-precision u -- float-ext ``set-precision''
Set the number of significant digits currently used by
F. FE. and FS. to u.
Angles in floating point operations are given in radians (a full circle has 2 pi radians).
fsin r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-sine''
fcos r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-cos''
fsincos r1 -- r2 r3 float-ext ``f-sine-cos''
r2=sin(r1), r3=cos(r1)
ftan r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-tan''
fasin r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-a-sine''
facos r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-a-cos''
fatan r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-a-tan''
fatan2 r1 r2 -- r3 float-ext ``f-a-tan-two''
r1/r2=tan(r3). ANS Forth does not require, but probably
intends this to be the inverse of fsincos. In gforth it is.
fsinh r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-cinch''
fcosh r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-cosh''
ftanh r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-tan-h''
fasinh r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-a-cinch''
facosh r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-a-cosh''
fatanh r1 -- r2 float-ext ``f-a-tan-h''
pi -- r gforth ``pi''
Fconstant -- r is the value pi; the ratio of a circle's area
to its diameter.
One particular problem with floating-point arithmetic is that comparison for equality often fails when you would expect it to succeed. For this reason approximate equality is often preferred (but you still have to know what you are doing). Also note that IEEE NaNs may compare differently from what you might expect. The comparison words are:
f~rel r1 r2 r3 -- flag gforth ``f~rel''
Approximate equality with relative error: |r1-r2|<r3*|r1+r2|.
f~abs r1 r2 r3 -- flag gforth ``f~abs''
Approximate equality with absolute error: |r1-r2|<r3.
f~ r1 r2 r3 -- flag float-ext ``f-proximate''
ANS Forth medley for comparing r1 and r2 for equality: r3>0:
f~abs; r3=0: bitwise comparison; r3<0: fnegate f~rel.
f= r1 r2 -- f gforth ``f-equals''
f<> r1 r2 -- f gforth ``f-not-equals''
f< r1 r2 -- f float ``f-less-than''
f<= r1 r2 -- f gforth ``f-less-or-equal''
f> r1 r2 -- f gforth ``f-greater-than''
f>= r1 r2 -- f gforth ``f-greater-or-equal''
f0< r -- f float ``f-zero-less-than''
f0<= r -- f gforth ``f-zero-less-or-equal''
f0<> r -- f gforth ``f-zero-not-equals''
f0= r -- f float ``f-zero-equals''
f0> r -- f gforth ``f-zero-greater-than''
f0>= r -- f gforth ``f-zero-greater-or-equal''
Gforth maintains a number of separate stacks:
drop w -- core ``drop''
nip w1 w2 -- w2 core-ext ``nip''
dup w -- w w core ``dupe''
over w1 w2 -- w1 w2 w1 core ``over''
tuck w1 w2 -- w2 w1 w2 core-ext ``tuck''
swap w1 w2 -- w2 w1 core ``swap''
pick u -- w core-ext ``pick''
Actually the stack effect is x0 ... xu u -- x0 ... xu x0 .
rot w1 w2 w3 -- w2 w3 w1 core ``rote''
-rot w1 w2 w3 -- w3 w1 w2 gforth ``not-rote''
?dup w -- w core ``question-dupe''
Actually the stack effect is: ( w -- 0 | w w ). It performs a
dup if w is nonzero.
roll x0 x1 .. xn n -- x1 .. xn x0 core-ext ``roll''
2drop w1 w2 -- core ``two-drop''
2nip w1 w2 w3 w4 -- w3 w4 gforth ``two-nip''
2dup w1 w2 -- w1 w2 w1 w2 core ``two-dupe''
2over w1 w2 w3 w4 -- w1 w2 w3 w4 w1 w2 core ``two-over''
2tuck w1 w2 w3 w4 -- w3 w4 w1 w2 w3 w4 gforth ``two-tuck''
2swap w1 w2 w3 w4 -- w3 w4 w1 w2 core ``two-swap''
2rot w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 w6 -- w3 w4 w5 w6 w1 w2 double-ext ``two-rote''
Whilst every sane Forth has a separate floating-point stack, it is not strictly required; an ANS Forth system could theoretically keep floating-point numbers on the data stack. As an additional difficulty, you don't know how many cells a floating-point number takes. It is reportedly possible to write words in a way that they work also for a unified stack model, but we do not recommend trying it. Instead, just say that your program has an environmental dependency on a separate floating-point stack.
floating-stack -- n environment ``floating-stack''
n is non-zero, showing that Gforth maintains a separate floating-point stack of depth n.
fdrop r -- float ``f-drop''
fnip r1 r2 -- r2 gforth ``f-nip''
fdup r -- r r float ``f-dupe''
fover r1 r2 -- r1 r2 r1 float ``f-over''
ftuck r1 r2 -- r2 r1 r2 gforth ``f-tuck''
fswap r1 r2 -- r2 r1 float ``f-swap''
fpick u -- r gforth ``fpick''
Actually the stack effect is r0 ... ru u -- r0 ... ru r0 .
frot r1 r2 r3 -- r2 r3 r1 float ``f-rote''
A Forth system is allowed to keep local variables on the return stack. This is reasonable, as local variables usually eliminate the need to use the return stack explicitly. So, if you want to produce a standard compliant program and you are using local variables in a word, forget about return stack manipulations in that word (refer to the standard document for the exact rules).
>r w -- R:w core ``to-r''
r> R:w -- w core ``r-from''
r@ -- w ; R: w -- w core ``r-fetch''
rdrop R:w -- gforth ``rdrop''
2>r d -- R:d core-ext ``two-to-r''
2r> R:d -- d core-ext ``two-r-from''
2r@ R:d -- R:d d core-ext ``two-r-fetch''
2rdrop R:d -- gforth ``two-r-drop''
Gforth uses an extra locals stack. It is described, along with the reasons for its existence, in section Locals implementation.
sp0 -- a-addr gforth ``sp0''
User variable -- initial value of the data stack pointer.
sp@ -- a-addr gforth ``sp-fetch''
sp! a-addr -- gforth ``sp-store''
fp0 -- a-addr gforth ``fp0''
User variable -- initial value of the floating-point stack pointer.
fp@ -- f-addr gforth ``fp-fetch''
fp! f-addr -- gforth ``fp-store''
rp0 -- a-addr gforth ``rp0''
User variable -- initial value of the return stack pointer.
rp@ -- a-addr gforth ``rp-fetch''
rp! a-addr -- gforth ``rp-store''
lp0 -- a-addr gforth ``lp0''
User variable -- initial value of the locals stack pointer.
lp@ -- addr gforth ``lp-fetch''
lp! c-addr -- gforth ``lp-store''
In addition to the standard Forth memory allocation words, there is also a garbage collector.
ANS Forth considers a Forth system as consisting of several address spaces, of which only data space is managed and accessible with the memory words. Memory not necessarily in data space includes the stacks, the code (called code space) and the headers (called name space). In Gforth everything is in data space, but the code for the primitives is usually read-only.
Data space is divided into a number of areas: The (data space portion of the) dictionary(10), the heap, and a number of system-allocated buffers.
In ANS Forth data space is also divided into contiguous regions. You can only use address arithmetic within a contiguous region, not between them. Usually each allocation gives you one contiguous region, but the dictionary allocation words have additional rules (see section Dictionary allocation).
Gforth provides one big address space, and address arithmetic can be performed between any addresses. However, in the dictionary headers or code are interleaved with data, so almost the only contiguous data space regions there are those described by ANS Forth as contiguous; but you can be sure that the dictionary is allocated towards increasing addresses even between contiguous regions. The memory order of allocations in the heap is platform-dependent (and possibly different from one run to the next).
Dictionary allocation is a stack-oriented allocation scheme, i.e., if you want to deallocate X, you also deallocate everything allocated after X.
The allocations using the words below are contiguous and grow the region
towards increasing addresses. Other words that allocate dictionary
memory of any kind (i.e., defining words including :noname) end
the contiguous region and start a new one.
In ANS Forth only created words are guaranteed to produce an
address that is the start of the following contiguous region. In
particular, the cell allocated by variable is not guaranteed to
be contiguous with following alloted memory.
You can deallocate memory by using allot with a negative argument
(with some restrictions, see allot). For larger deallocations use
marker.
here -- addr core ``here''
Return the address of the next free location in data space.
unused -- u core-ext ``unused''
Return the amount of free space remaining (in address units) in
the region addressed by here.
allot n -- core ``allot''
Reserve n address units of data space without initialization. n is a signed number, passing a negative n releases memory. In ANS Forth you can only deallocate memory from the current contiguous region in this way. In Gforth you can deallocate anything in this way but named words. The system does not check this restriction.
c, c -- core ``c-comma''
Reserve data space for one char and store c in the space.
f, f -- gforth ``f,''
Reserve data space for one floating-point number and store f in the space.
, w -- core ``comma''
Reserve data space for one cell and store w in the space.
2, w1 w2 -- gforth ``2,''
Reserve data space for two cells and store the double w1 w2 there, w2 first (lower address).
Memory accesses have to be aligned (see section Address arithmetic). So of
course you should allocate memory in an aligned way, too. I.e., before
allocating allocating a cell, here must be cell-aligned, etc.
The words below align here if it is not already. Basically it is
only already aligned for a type, if the last allocation was a multiple
of the size of this type and if here was aligned for this type
before.
After freshly createing a word, here is aligned in
ANS Forth (maxaligned in Gforth).
align -- core ``align''
If the data-space pointer is not aligned, reserve enough space to align it.
falign -- float ``f-align''
If the data-space pointer is not float-aligned, reserve enough space to align it.
sfalign -- float-ext ``s-f-align''
If the data-space pointer is not single-float-aligned, reserve enough space to align it.
dfalign -- float-ext ``d-f-align''
If the data-space pointer is not double-float-aligned, reserve enough space to align it.
maxalign -- gforth ``maxalign''
Align data-space pointer for all alignment requirements.
cfalign -- gforth ``cfalign''
Align data-space pointer for code field requirements (i.e., such that the corresponding body is maxaligned).
Heap allocation supports deallocation of allocated memory in any order. Dictionary allocation is not affected by it (i.e., it does not end a contiguous region). In Gforth, these words are implemented using the standard C library calls malloc(), free() and resize().
The memory region produced by one invocation of allocate or
resize is internally contiguous. There is no contiguity between
such a region and any other region (including others allocated from the
heap).
allocate u -- a-addr wior memory ``allocate''
Allocate u address units of contiguous data space. The initial contents of the data space is undefined. If the allocation is successful, a-addr is the start address of the allocated region and wior is 0. If the allocation fails, a-addr is undefined and wior is a non-zero I/O result code.
free a-addr -- wior memory ``free''
Return the region of data space starting at a-addr to the system.
The region must originally have been obtained using allocate or
resize. If the operational is successful, wior is 0.
If the operation fails, wior is a non-zero I/O result code.
resize a-addr1 u -- a-addr2 wior memory ``resize''
Change the size of the allocated area at a-addr1 to u
address units, possibly moving the contents to a different
area. a-addr2 is the address of the resulting area.
If the operation is successful, wior is 0.
If the operation fails, wior is a non-zero
I/O result code. If a-addr1 is 0, Gforth's (but not the Standard)
resize allocates u address units.
@ a-addr -- w core ``fetch''
w is the cell stored at a_addr.
! w a-addr -- core ``store''
Store w into the cell at a-addr.
+! n a-addr -- core ``plus-store''
Add n to the cell at a-addr.
c@ c-addr -- c core ``c-fetch''
c is the char stored at c_addr.
c! c c-addr -- core ``c-store''
Store c into the char at c-addr.
2@ a-addr -- w1 w2 core ``two-fetch''
w2 is the content of the cell stored at a-addr, w1 is the content of the next cell.
2! w1 w2 a-addr -- core ``two-store''
Store w2 into the cell at c-addr and w1 into the next cell.
f@ f-addr -- r float ``f-fetch''
r is the float at address f-addr.
f! r f-addr -- float ``f-store''
Store r into the float at address f-addr.
sf@ sf-addr -- r float-ext ``s-f-fetch''
Fetch the single-precision IEEE floating-point value r from the address sf-addr.
sf! r sf-addr -- float-ext ``s-f-store''
Store r as single-precision IEEE floating-point value to the address sf-addr.
df@ df-addr -- r float-ext ``d-f-fetch''
Fetch the double-precision IEEE floating-point value r from the address df-addr.
df! r df-addr -- float-ext ``d-f-store''
Store r as double-precision IEEE floating-point value to the address df-addr.
Address arithmetic is the foundation on which you can build data structures like arrays, records (see section Structures) and objects (see section Object-oriented Forth).
ANS Forth does not specify the sizes of the data types. Instead, it
offers a number of words for computing sizes and doing address
arithmetic. Address arithmetic is performed in terms of address units
(aus); on most systems the address unit is one byte. Note that a
character may have more than one au, so chars is no noop (on
platforms where it is a noop, it compiles to nothing).
The basic address arithmetic words are + and -. E.g., if
you have the address of a cell, perform 1 cells +, and you will
have the address of the next cell.
In ANS Forth you can perform address arithmetic only within a contiguous region, i.e., if you have an address into one region, you can only add and subtract such that the result is still within the region; you can only subtract or compare addresses from within the same contiguous region. Reasons: several contiguous regions can be arranged in memory in any way; on segmented systems addresses may have unusual representations, such that address arithmetic only works within a region. Gforth provides a few more guarantees (linear address space, dictionary grows upwards), but in general I have found it easy to stay within contiguous regions (exception: computing and comparing to the address just beyond the end of an array).
ANS Forth also defines words for aligning addresses for specific types. Many computers require that accesses to specific data types must only occur at specific addresses; e.g., that cells may only be accessed at addresses divisible by 4. Even if a machine allows unaligned accesses, it can usually perform aligned accesses faster.
For the performance-conscious: alignment operations are usually only necessary during the definition of a data structure, not during the (more frequent) accesses to it.
ANS Forth defines no words for character-aligning addresses. This is not an oversight, but reflects the fact that addresses that are not char-aligned have no use in the standard and therefore will not be created.
ANS Forth guarantees that addresses returned by CREATEd words
are cell-aligned; in addition, Gforth guarantees that these addresses
are aligned for all purposes.
Note that the ANS Forth word char has nothing to do with address
arithmetic.
chars n1 -- n2 core ``chars''
n2 is the number of address units of n1 chars.""
char+ c-addr1 -- c-addr2 core ``char-plus''
1 chars +.
cells n1 -- n2 core ``cells''
n2 is the number of address units of n1 cells.
cell+ a-addr1 -- a-addr2 core ``cell-plus''
1 cells +
cell -- u gforth ``cell''
Constant -- 1 cells
aligned c-addr -- a-addr core ``aligned''
a-addr is the first aligned address greater than or equal to c-addr.
floats n1 -- n2 float ``floats''
n2 is the number of address units of n1 floats.
float+ f-addr1 -- f-addr2 float ``float-plus''
1 floats +.
float -- u gforth ``float''
Constant -- the number of address units corresponding to a floating-point number.
faligned c-addr -- f-addr float ``f-aligned''
f-addr is the first float-aligned address greater than or equal to c-addr.
sfloats n1 -- n2 float-ext ``s-floats''
n2 is the number of address units of n1 single-precision IEEE floating-point numbers.
sfloat+ sf-addr1 -- sf-addr2 float-ext ``s-float-plus''
1 sfloats +.
sfaligned c-addr -- sf-addr float-ext ``s-f-aligned''
sf-addr is the first single-float-aligned address greater than or equal to c-addr.
dfloats n1 -- n2 float-ext ``d-floats''
n2 is the number of address units of n1 double-precision IEEE floating-point numbers.
dfloat+ df-addr1 -- df-addr2 float-ext ``d-float-plus''
1 dfloats +.
dfaligned c-addr -- df-addr float-ext ``d-f-aligned''
df-addr is the first double-float-aligned address greater than or equal to c-addr.
maxaligned addr1 -- addr2 gforth ``maxaligned''
addr2 is the first address after addr1 that satisfies all alignment restrictions. maxaligned"
cfaligned addr1 -- addr2 gforth ``cfaligned''
addr2 is the first address after addr1 that is aligned for a code field (i.e., such that the corresponding body is maxaligned).
ADDRESS-UNIT-BITS -- n environment ``ADDRESS-UNIT-BITS''
Size of one address unit, in bits.
Memory blocks often represent character strings; For ways of storing character strings in memory see section String Formats. For other string-processing words see section Displaying characters and strings.
A few of these words work on address unit blocks. In that case, you
usually have to insert CHARS before the word when working on
character strings. Most words work on character blocks, and expect a
char-aligned address.
When copying characters between overlapping memory regions, use
chars move or choose carefully between cmove and
cmove>.
move c-from c-to ucount -- core ``move''
Copy the contents of ucount aus at c-from to
c-to. move works correctly even if the two areas overlap.
erase addr u -- core-ext ``erase''
Clear all bits in u aus starting at addr.
cmove c-from c-to u -- string ``c-move''
Copy the contents of ucount characters from data space at
c-from to c-to. The copy proceeds char-by-char
from low address to high address; i.e., for overlapping areas it is
safe if c-to=<c-from.
cmove> c-from c-to u -- string ``c-move-up''
Copy the contents of ucount characters from data space at
c-from to c-to. The copy proceeds char-by-char
from high address to low address; i.e., for overlapping areas it is
safe if c-to>=c-from.
fill c-addr u c -- core ``fill''
Store c in u chars starting at c-addr.
blank c-addr u -- string ``blank''
Store the space character into u chars starting at c-addr.
compare c-addr1 u1 c-addr2 u2 -- n string ``compare''
Compare two strings lexicographically. If they are equal, n is 0; if the first string is smaller, n is -1; if the first string is larger, n is 1. Currently this is based on the machine's character comparison. In the future, this may change to consider the current locale and its collation order.
str= c-addr1 u1 c-addr2 u2 -- f gforth ``str=''
str< c-addr1 u1 c-addr2 u2 -- f gforth ``str<''
string-prefix? c-addr1 u1 c-addr2 u2 -- f gforth ``string-prefix?''
Is c-addr2 u2 a prefix of c-addr1 u1?
search c-addr1 u1 c-addr2 u2 -- c-addr3 u3 flag string ``search''
Search the string specified by c-addr1, u1 for the string specified by c-addr2, u2. If flag is true: match was found at c-addr3 with u3 characters remaining. If flag is false: no match was found; c-addr3, u3 are equal to c-addr1, u1.
-trailing c_addr u1 -- c_addr u2 string ``dash-trailing''
Adjust the string specified by c-addr, u1 to remove all trailing spaces. u2 is the length of the modified string.
/string c-addr1 u1 n -- c-addr2 u2 string ``slash-string''
Adjust the string specified by c-addr1, u1 to remove n characters from the start of the string.
bounds addr u -- addr+u addr gforth ``bounds''
Given a memory block represented by starting address addr
and length u in aus, produce the end address addr+u and
the start address in the right order for u+do or
?do.
Control structures in Forth cannot be used interpretively, only in a colon definition(11). We do not like this limitation, but have not seen a satisfying way around it yet, although many schemes have been proposed.
flag IF code ENDIF
If flag is non-zero (as far as IF etc. are concerned, a cell
with any bit set represents truth) code is executed.
flag IF code1 ELSE code2 ENDIF
If flag is true, code1 is executed, otherwise code2 is executed.
You can use THEN instead of ENDIF. Indeed, THEN is
standard, and ENDIF is not, although it is quite popular. We
recommend using ENDIF, because it is less confusing for people
who also know other languages (and is not prone to reinforcing negative
prejudices against Forth in these people). Adding ENDIF to a
system that only supplies THEN is simple:
: ENDIF POSTPONE then ; immediate
[According to Webster's New Encyclopedic Dictionary, then (adv.) has the following meanings:
... 2b: following next after in order ... 3d: as a necessary consequence (if you were there, then you saw them).
Forth's THEN has the meaning 2b, whereas THEN in Pascal
and many other programming languages has the meaning 3d.]
Gforth also provides the words ?DUP-IF and ?DUP-0=-IF, so
you can avoid using ?dup. Using these alternatives is also more
efficient than using ?dup. Definitions in ANS Forth
for ENDIF, ?DUP-IF and ?DUP-0=-IF are provided in
`compat/control.fs'.
n CASE n1 OF code1 ENDOF n2 OF code2 ENDOF ... ( n ) default-code ( n ) ENDCASE
Executes the first codei, where the ni is equal to n. If no
ni matches, the optional default-code is executed. The optional
default case can be added by simply writing the code after the last
ENDOF. It may use n, which is on top of the stack, but must
not consume it.
@progstyle To keep the code understandable, you should ensure that on all paths through a selection construct the stack is changed in the same way (wrt. number and types of stack items consumed and pushed).
BEGIN code1 flag WHILE code2 REPEAT
code1 is executed and flag is computed. If it is true,
code2 is executed and the loop is restarted; If flag is
false, execution continues after the REPEAT.
BEGIN code flag UNTIL
code is executed. The loop is restarted if flag is false.
@progstyle To keep the code understandable, a complete iteration of the loop should not change the number and types of the items on the stacks.
BEGIN code AGAIN
This is an endless loop.
The basic counted loop is:
limit start ?DO body LOOP
This performs one iteration for every integer, starting from start
and up to, but excluding limit. The counter, or index, can be
accessed with i. For example, the loop:
10 0 ?DO i . LOOP
prints 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
The index of the innermost loop can be accessed with i, the index
of the next loop with j, and the index of the third loop with
k.
i R:n -- R:n n core ``i''
j R:n R:d1 -- n R:n R:d1 core ``j''
k R:n R:d1 R:d2 -- n R:n R:d1 R:d2 gforth ``k''
The loop control data are kept on the return stack, so there are some restrictions on mixing return stack accesses and counted loop words. In particuler, if you put values on the return stack outside the loop, you cannot read them inside the loop(12). If you put values on the return stack within a loop, you have to remove them before the end of the loop and before accessing the index of the loop.
There are several variations on the counted loop:
LEAVE leaves the innermost counted loop immediately; execution
continues after the associated LOOP or NEXT. For example:
10 0 ?DO i DUP . 3 = IF LEAVE THEN LOOPprints
0 1 2 3
UNLOOP prepares for an abnormal loop exit, e.g., via
EXIT. UNLOOP removes the loop control parameters from the
return stack so EXIT can get to its return address. For example:
: demo 10 0 ?DO i DUP . 3 = IF UNLOOP EXIT THEN LOOP ." Done" ;prints
0 1 2 3
?DO loop is entered
(and LOOP iterates until they become equal by wrap-around
arithmetic). This behaviour is usually not what you want. Therefore,
Gforth offers +DO and U+DO (as replacements for
?DO), which do not enter the loop if start is greater than
limit; +DO is for signed loop parameters, U+DO for
unsigned loop parameters.
?DO can be replaced by DO. DO always enters
the loop, independent of the loop parameters. Do not use DO, even
if you know that the loop is entered in any case. Such knowledge tends
to become invalid during maintenance of a program, and then the
DO will make trouble.
LOOP can be replaced with n +LOOP; this updates the
index by n instead of by 1. The loop is terminated when the border
between limit-1 and limit is crossed. E.g.:
4 0 +DO i . 2 +LOOPprints
0 2
4 1 +DO i . 2 +LOOPprints
1 3
n +LOOP is peculiar when n is negative:
-1 0 ?DO i . -1 +LOOPprints
0 -1
0 0 ?DO i . -1 +LOOPprints nothing. Therefore we recommend avoiding
n +LOOP with negative
n. One alternative is u -LOOP, which reduces the
index by u each iteration. The loop is terminated when the border
between limit+1 and limit is crossed. Gforth also provides
-DO and U-DO for down-counting loops. E.g.:
-2 0 -DO i . 1 -LOOPprints
0 -1
-1 0 -DO i . 1 -LOOPprints
0
0 0 -DO i . 1 -LOOPprints nothing.
Unfortunately, +DO, U+DO, -DO, U-DO and
-LOOP are not defined in ANS Forth. However, an implementation
for these words that uses only standard words is provided in
`compat/loops.fs'.
n FOR body NEXT
This is the preferred loop of native code compiler writers who are too
lazy to optimize ?DO loops properly. This loop structure is not
defined in ANS Forth. In Gforth, this loop iterates n+1 times;
i produces values starting with n and ending with 0. Other
Forth systems may behave differently, even if they support FOR
loops. To avoid problems, don't use FOR loops.
ANS Forth permits and supports using control structures in a non-nested way. Information about incomplete control structures is stored on the control-flow stack. This stack may be implemented on the Forth data stack, and this is what we have done in Gforth.
An orig entry represents an unresolved forward branch, a dest entry represents a backward branch target. A few words are the basis for building any control structure possible (except control structures that need storage, like calls, coroutines, and backtracking).
IF compilation -- orig ; run-time f -- core ``IF''
AHEAD compilation -- orig ; run-time -- tools-ext ``AHEAD''
THEN compilation orig -- ; run-time -- core ``THEN''
BEGIN compilation -- dest ; run-time -- core ``BEGIN''
UNTIL compilation dest -- ; run-time f -- core ``UNTIL''
AGAIN compilation dest -- ; run-time -- core-ext ``AGAIN''
CS-PICK ... u -- ... destu tools-ext ``c-s-pick''
CS-ROLL destu/origu .. dest0/orig0 u -- .. dest0/orig0 destu/origu tools-ext ``c-s-roll''
The Standard words CS-PICK and CS-ROLL allow you to
manipulate the control-flow stack in a portable way. Without them, you
would need to know how many stack items are occupied by a control-flow
entry (many systems use one cell. In Gforth they currently take three,
but this may change in the future).
Some standard control structure words are built from these words:
ELSE compilation orig1 -- orig2 ; run-time f -- core ``ELSE''
WHILE compilation dest -- orig dest ; run-time f -- core ``WHILE''
REPEAT compilation orig dest -- ; run-time -- core ``REPEAT''
Gforth adds some more control-structure words:
ENDIF compilation orig -- ; run-time -- gforth ``ENDIF''
?DUP-IF compilation -- orig ; run-time n -- n| gforth ``question-dupe-if''
This is the preferred alternative to the idiom "?DUP IF", since it can be
better handled by tools like stack checkers. Besides, it's faster.
?DUP-0=-IF compilation -- orig ; run-time n -- n| gforth ``question-dupe-zero-equals-if''
Counted loop words constitute a separate group of words:
?DO compilation -- do-sys ; run-time w1 w2 -- | loop-sys core-ext ``question-do''
+DO compilation -- do-sys ; run-time n1 n2 -- | loop-sys gforth ``plus-do''
U+DO compilation -- do-sys ; run-time u1 u2 -- | loop-sys gforth ``u-plus-do''
-DO compilation -- do-sys ; run-time n1 n2 -- | loop-sys gforth ``minus-do''
U-DO compilation -- do-sys ; run-time u1 u2 -- | loop-sys gforth ``u-minus-do''
DO compilation -- do-sys ; run-time w1 w2 -- loop-sys core ``DO''
FOR compilation -- do-sys ; run-time u -- loop-sys gforth ``FOR''
LOOP compilation do-sys -- ; run-time loop-sys1 -- | loop-sys2 core ``LOOP''
+LOOP compilation do-sys -- ; run-time loop-sys1 n -- | loop-sys2 core ``plus-loop''
-LOOP compilation do-sys -- ; run-time loop-sys1 u -- | loop-sys2 gforth ``minus-loop''
NEXT compilation do-sys -- ; run-time loop-sys1 -- | loop-sys2 gforth ``NEXT''
LEAVE compilation -- ; run-time loop-sys -- core ``LEAVE''
?LEAVE compilation -- ; run-time f | f loop-sys -- gforth ``question-leave''
unloop R:w1 R:w2 -- core ``unloop''
DONE compilation orig -- ; run-time -- gforth ``DONE''
The standard does not allow using CS-PICK and CS-ROLL on
do-sys. Gforth allows it, but it's your job to ensure that for
every ?DO etc. there is exactly one UNLOOP on any path
through the definition (LOOP etc. compile an UNLOOP on the
fall-through path). Also, you have to ensure that all LEAVEs are
resolved (by using one of the loop-ending words or DONE).
Another group of control structure words are:
case compilation -- case-sys ; run-time -- core-ext ``case''
endcase compilation case-sys -- ; run-time x -- core-ext ``end-case''
of compilation -- of-sys ; run-time x1 x2 -- |x1 core-ext ``of''
endof compilation case-sys1 of-sys -- case-sys2 ; run-time -- core-ext ``end-of''
case-sys and of-sys cannot be processed using CS-PICK and
CS-ROLL.
In order to ensure readability we recommend that you do not create arbitrary control structures directly, but define new control structure words for the control structure you want and use these words in your program. For example, instead of writing:
BEGIN ... IF [ 1 CS-ROLL ] ... AGAIN THEN
we recommend defining control structure words, e.g.,
: WHILE ( DEST -- ORIG DEST ) POSTPONE IF 1 CS-ROLL ; immediate : REPEAT ( orig dest -- ) POSTPONE AGAIN POSTPONE THEN ; immediate
and then using these to create the control structure:
BEGIN ... WHILE ... REPEAT
That's much easier to read, isn't it? Of course, REPEAT and
WHILE are predefined, so in this example it would not be
necessary to define them.
A definition can be called simply be writing the name of the definition
to be called. Normally a definition is invisible during its own
definition. If you want to write a directly recursive definition, you
can use recursive to make the current definition visible, or
recurse to call the current definition directly.
recursive compilation -- ; run-time -- gforth ``recursive''
Make the current definition visible, enabling it to call itself recursively.
recurse compilation -- ; run-time ?? -- ?? core ``recurse''
Call the current definition.
@progstyle I prefer using
recursivetorecurse, because calling the definition by name is more descriptive (if the name is well-chosen) than the somewhat crypticrecurse. E.g., in a quicksort implementation, it is much better to read (and think) "now sort the partitions" than to read "now do a recursive call".
For mutual recursion, use Deferred words, like this:
Defer foo : bar ( ... -- ... ) ... foo ... ; :noname ( ... -- ... ) ... bar ... ; IS foo
Deferred words are discussed in more detail in section Deferred words.
The current definition returns control to the calling definition when
the end of the definition is reached or EXIT is encountered.
EXIT compilation -- ; run-time nest-sys -- core ``EXIT''
Return to the calling definition; usually used as a way of
forcing an early return from a definition. Before
EXITing you must clean up the return stack and
UNLOOP any outstanding ?DO...LOOPs.
;s R:w -- gforth ``semis''
The primitive compiled by EXIT.
If a word detects an error condition that it cannot handle, it can
throw an exception. In the simplest case, this will terminate
your program, and report an appropriate error.
throw y1 .. ym nerror -- y1 .. ym / z1 .. zn error exception ``throw''
If nerror is 0, drop it and continue. Otherwise, transfer control to the next dynamically enclosing exception handler, reset the stacks accordingly, and push nerror.
Throw consumes a cell-sized error number on the stack. There are
some predefined error numbers in ANS Forth (see `errors.fs'). In
Gforth (and most other systems) you can use the iors produced by various
words as error numbers (e.g., a typical use of allocate is
allocate throw). Gforth also provides the word exception
to define your own error numbers (with decent error reporting); an ANS
Forth version of this word (but without the error messages) is available
in compat/except.fs. And finally, you can use your own error
numbers (anything outside the range -4095..0), but won't get nice error
messages, only numbers. For example, try:
-10 throw \ ANS defined -267 throw \ system defined s" my error" exception throw \ user defined 7 throw \ arbitrary number
exception addr u -- n gforth ``exception''
n is a previously unused throw value in the range
(-4095...-256). Consecutive calls to exception return
consecutive decreasing numbers. Gforth uses the string
addr u as an error message.
A common idiom to THROW a specific error if a flag is true is
this:
( flag ) 0<> errno and throw
Your program can provide exception handlers to catch exceptions. An
exception handler can be used to correct the problem, or to clean up
some data structures and just throw the exception to the next exception
handler. Note that throw jumps to the dynamically innermost
exception handler. The system's exception handler is outermost, and just
prints an error and restarts command-line interpretation (or, in batch
mode (i.e., while processing the shell command line), leaves Gforth).
The ANS Forth way to catch exceptions is catch:
catch ... xt -- ... n exception ``catch''
The most common use of exception handlers is to clean up the state when an error happens. E.g.,
base >r hex \ actually the hex should be inside foo, or we h ['] foo catch ( nerror|0 ) r> base ! ( nerror|0 ) throw \ pass it on
A use of catch for handling the error myerror might look
like this:
['] foo catch CASE myerror OF ... ( do something about it ) ENDOF dup throw \ default: pass other errors on, do nothing on non-errors ENDCASE
Having to wrap the code into a separate word is often cumbersome, therefore Gforth provides an alternative syntax:
TRY code1 RECOVER \ optional code2 \ optional ENDTRY
This performs Code1. If code1 completes normally, execution
continues after the endtry. If Code1 throws, the stacks are
reset to the state during try, the throw value is pushed on the
data stack, and execution constinues at code2, and finally falls
through the endtry into the following code.
try compilation -- orig ; run-time -- gforth ``try''
recover compilation orig1 -- orig2 ; run-time -- gforth ``recover''
endtry compilation orig -- ; run-time -- gforth ``endtry''
The cleanup example from above in this syntax:
base >r TRY hex foo \ now the hex is placed correctly 0 \ value for throw RECOVER ENDTRY r> base ! throw
And here's the error handling example:
TRY
foo
RECOVER
CASE
myerror OF ... ( do something about it ) ENDOF
throw \ pass other errors on
ENDCASE
ENDTRY
@progstyle
As usual, you should ensure that the stack depth is statically known at
the end: either after the throw for passing on errors, or after
the ENDTRY (or, if you use catch, after the end of the
selection construct for handling the error).
There are two alternatives to throw: Abort" is conditional
and you can provide an error message. Abort just produces an
"Aborted" error.
The problem with these words is that exception handlers cannot
differentiate between different abort"s; they just look like
-2 throw to them (the error message cannot be accessed by
standard programs). Similar abort looks like -1 throw to
exception handlers.
ABORT" compilation 'ccc"' -- ; run-time f -- core,exception-ext ``abort-quote''
If any bit of f is non-zero, perform the function of -2 throw,
displaying the string ccc if there is no exception frame on the
exception stack.
abort ?? -- ?? core,exception-ext ``abort''
-1 throw.
Defining words are used to extend Forth by creating new entries in the dictionary.
CREATE
Defining words are used to create new entries in the dictionary. The
simplest defining word is CREATE. CREATE is used like
this:
CREATE new-word1
CREATE is a parsing word, i.e., it takes an argument from the
input stream (new-word1 in our example). It generates a
dictionary entry for new-word1. When new-word1 is
executed, all that it does is leave an address on the stack. The address
represents the value of the data space pointer (HERE) at the time
that new-word1 was defined. Therefore, CREATE is a way of
associating a name with the address of a region of memory.
Create "name" -- core ``Create''
Note that in ANS Forth guarantees only for create that its body
is in dictionary data space (i.e., where here, allot
etc. work, see section Dictionary allocation). Also, in ANS Forth only
created words can be modified with does>
(see section User-defined Defining Words). And in ANS Forth >body
can only be applied to created words.
By extending this example to reserve some memory in data space, we end up with something like a variable. Here are two different ways to do it:
CREATE new-word2 1 cells allot \ reserve 1 cell - initial value undefined CREATE new-word3 4 , \ reserve 1 cell and initialise it (to 4)
The variable can be examined and modified using @ ("fetch") and
! ("store") like this:
new-word2 @ . \ get address, fetch from it and display 1234 new-word2 ! \ new value, get address, store to it
A similar mechanism can be used to create arrays. For example, an 80-character text input buffer:
CREATE text-buf 80 chars allot text-buf 0 chars c@ \ the 1st character (offset 0) text-buf 3 chars c@ \ the 4th character (offset 3)
You can build arbitrarily complex data structures by allocating appropriate areas of memory. For further discussions of this, and to learn about some Gforth tools that make it easier, See section Structures.
The previous section showed how a sequence of commands could be used to generate a variable. As a final refinement, the whole code sequence can be wrapped up in a defining word (pre-empting the subject of the next section), making it easier to create new variables:
: myvariableX ( "name" -- a-addr ) CREATE 1 cells allot ; : myvariable0 ( "name" -- a-addr ) CREATE 0 , ; myvariableX foo \ variable foo starts off with an unknown value myvariable0 joe \ whilst joe is initialised to 0 45 3 * foo ! \ set foo to 135 1234 joe ! \ set joe to 1234 3 joe +! \ increment joe by 3.. to 1237
Not surprisingly, there is no need to define myvariable, since
Forth already has a definition Variable. ANS Forth does not
guarantee that a Variable is initialised when it is created
(i.e., it may behave like myvariableX). In contrast, Gforth's
Variable initialises the variable to 0 (i.e., it behaves exactly
like myvariable0). Forth also provides 2Variable and
fvariable for double and floating-point variables, respectively
-- they are initialised to 0. and 0e in Gforth. If you use a Variable to
store a boolean, you can use on and off to toggle its
state.
Variable "name" -- core ``Variable''
2Variable "name" -- double ``two-variable''
fvariable "name" -- float ``f-variable''
The defining word User behaves in the same way as Variable.
The difference is that it reserves space in user (data) space rather
than normal data space. In a Forth system that has a multi-tasker, each
task has its own set of user variables.
User "name" -- gforth ``User''
Constant allows you to declare a fixed value and refer to it by
name. For example:
12 Constant INCHES-PER-FOOT 3E+08 fconstant SPEED-O-LIGHT
A Variable can be both read and written, so its run-time
behaviour is to supply an address through which its current value can be
manipulated. In contrast, the value of a Constant cannot be
changed once it has been declared(13) so it's not necessary to supply the address -- it is more
efficient to return the value of the constant directly. That's exactly
what happens; the run-time effect of a constant is to put its value on
the top of the stack (You can find one
way of implementing Constant in section User-defined Defining Words).
Forth also provides 2Constant and fconstant for defining
double and floating-point constants, respectively.
Constant w "name" -- core ``Constant''
Define a constant name with value w. name execution: -- w
2Constant w1 w2 "name" -- double ``two-constant''
fconstant r "name" -- float ``f-constant''
Constants in Forth behave differently from their equivalents in other programming languages. In other languages, a constant (such as an EQU in assembler or a #define in C) only exists at compile-time; in the executable program the constant has been translated into an absolute number and, unless you are using a symbolic debugger, it's impossible to know what abstract thing that number represents. In Forth a constant has an entry in the header space and remains there after the code that uses it has been defined. In fact, it must remain in the dictionary since it has run-time duties to perform. For example:
12 Constant INCHES-PER-FOOT : FEET-TO-INCHES ( n1 -- n2 ) INCHES-PER-FOOT * ;
When FEET-TO-INCHES is executed, it will in turn execute the xt
associated with the constant INCHES-PER-FOOT. If you use
see to decompile the definition of FEET-TO-INCHES, you can
see that it makes a call to INCHES-PER-FOOT. Some Forth compilers
attempt to optimise constants by in-lining them where they are used. You
can force Gforth to in-line a constant like this:
: FEET-TO-INCHES ( n1 -- n2 ) [ INCHES-PER-FOOT ] LITERAL * ;
If you use see to decompile this version of
FEET-TO-INCHES, you can see that INCHES-PER-FOOT is no
longer present. To understand how this works, read
section Interpret/Compile states, and section Literals.
In-lining constants in this way might improve execution time fractionally, and can ensure that a constant is now only referenced at compile-time. However, the definition of the constant still remains in the dictionary. Some Forth compilers provide a mechanism for controlling a second dictionary for holding transient words such that this second dictionary can be deleted later in order to recover memory space. However, there is no standard way of doing this.
A Value behaves like a Constant, but it can be changed.
TO is a parsing word that changes a Values. In Gforth
(not in ANS Forth) you can access (and change) a value also with
>body.
Here are some examples:
12 Value APPLES \ Define APPLES with an initial value of 12 34 TO APPLES \ Change the value of APPLES. TO is a parsing word 1 ' APPLES >body +! \ Increment APPLES. Non-standard usage. APPLES \ puts 35 on the top of the stack.
Value w "name" -- core-ext ``Value''
TO w "name" -- core-ext ``TO''
: name ( ... -- ... )
word1 word2 word3 ;
Creates a word called name that, upon execution, executes
word1 word2 word3. name is a (colon) definition.
The explanation above is somewhat superficial. For simple examples of colon definitions see section Your first Forth definition. For an in-depth discussion of some of the issues involved, See section Interpretation and Compilation Semantics.
: "name" -- colon-sys core ``colon''
; compilation colon-sys -- ; run-time nest-sys core ``semicolon''
Sometimes you want to define an anonymous word; a word without a name. You can do this with:
:noname -- xt colon-sys core-ext ``colon-no-name''
This leaves the execution token for the word on the stack after the
closing ;. Here's an example in which a deferred word is
initialised with an xt from an anonymous colon definition:
Defer deferred :noname ( ... -- ... ) ... ; IS deferred
Gforth provides an alternative way of doing this, using two separate words:
noname -- gforth ``noname''
The next defined word will be anonymous. The defining word will
leave the input stream alone. The xt of the defined word will
be given by latestxt.
latestxt -- xt gforth ``latestxt''
xt is the execution token of the last word defined.
The previous example can be rewritten using noname and
latestxt:
Defer deferred noname : ( ... -- ... ) ... ; latestxt IS deferred
noname works with any defining word, not just :.
latestxt also works when the last word was not defined as
noname. It does not work for combined words, though. It also has
the useful property that is is valid as soon as the header for a
definition has been built. Thus:
latestxt . : foo [ latestxt . ] ; ' foo .
prints 3 numbers; the last two are the same.
By default, a defining word takes the name for the defined word from the input stream. Sometimes you want to supply the name from a string. You can do this with:
nextname c-addr u -- gforth ``nextname''
The next defined word will have the name c-addr u; the defining word will leave the input stream alone.
For example:
s" foo" nextname create
is equivalent to:
create foo
nextname works with any defining word.
You can create a new defining word by wrapping defining-time code around an existing defining word and putting the sequence in a colon definition.
For example, suppose that you have a word stats that
gathers statistics about colon definitions given the xt of the
definition, and you want every colon definition in your application to
make a call to stats. You can define and use a new version of
: like this:
: stats ( xt -- ) DUP ." (Gathering statistics for " . ." )" ... ; \ other code : my: : latestxt postpone literal ['] stats compile, ; my: foo + - ;
When foo is defined using my: these steps occur:
my: is executed.
: within the definition (the one between my: and
latestxt) is executed, and does just what it always does; it parses
the input stream for a name, builds a dictionary header for the name
foo and switches state from interpret to compile.
latestxt is executed. It puts the xt for the word that is
being defined -- foo -- onto the stack.
postpone literal is executed; this
causes the value on the stack to be compiled as a literal in the code
area of foo.
['] stats compiles a literal into the definition of
my:. When compile, is executed, that literal -- the
execution token for stats -- is layed down in the code area of
foo , following the literal(14).
my: is complete, and control
returns to the text interpreter. The text interpreter is in compile
state, so subsequent text + - is compiled into the definition of
foo and the ; terminates the definition as always.
You can use see to decompile a word that was defined using
my: and see how it is different from a normal :
definition. For example:
: bar + - ; \ like foo but using : rather than my: see bar : bar + - ; see foo : foo 107645672 stats + - ; \ use ' stats . to show that 107645672 is the xt for stats
You can use techniques like this to make new defining words in terms of any existing defining word.
If you want the words defined with your defining words to behave differently from words defined with standard defining words, you can write your defining word like this:
: def-word ( "name" -- )
CREATE code1
DOES> ( ... -- ... )
code2 ;
def-word name
This fragment defines a defining word def-word and then
executes it. When def-word executes, it CREATEs a new
word, name, and executes the code code1. The code code2
is not executed at this time. The word name is sometimes called a
child of def-word.
When you execute name, the address of the body of name is
put on the data stack and code2 is executed (the address of the body
of name is the address HERE returns immediately after the
CREATE, i.e., the address a created word returns by
default).
You can use def-word to define a set of child words that behave
similarly; they all have a common run-time behaviour determined by
code2. Typically, the code1 sequence builds a data area in the
body of the child word. The structure of the data is common to all
children of def-word, but the data values are specific -- and
private -- to each child word. When a child word is executed, the
address of its private data area is passed as a parameter on TOS to be
used and manipulated(15) by code2.
The two fragments of code that make up the defining words act (are executed) at two completely separate times:
Another way of understanding the behaviour of def-word and
name is to say that, if you make the following definitions:
: def-word1 ( "name" -- )
CREATE code1 ;
: action1 ( ... -- ... )
code2 ;
def-word1 name1
Then using name1 action1 is equivalent to using name.
The classic example is that you can define CONSTANT in this way:
: CONSTANT ( w "name" -- )
CREATE ,
DOES> ( -- w )
@ ;
When you create a constant with 5 CONSTANT five, a set of
define-time actions take place; first a new word five is created,
then the value 5 is laid down in the body of five with
,. When five is executed, the address of the body is put on
the stack, and @ retrieves the value 5. The word five has
no code of its own; it simply contains a data field and a pointer to the
code that follows DOES> in its defining word. That makes words
created in this way very compact.
The final example in this section is intended to remind you that space
reserved in CREATEd words is data space and therefore can be
both read and written by a Standard program(16):
: foo ( "name" -- )
CREATE -1 ,
DOES> ( -- )
@ . ;
foo first-word
foo second-word
123 ' first-word >BODY !
If first-word had been a CREATEd word, we could simply
have executed it to get the address of its data field. However, since it
was defined to have DOES> actions, its execution semantics are to
perform those DOES> actions. To get the address of its data field
it's necessary to use ' to get its xt, then >BODY to
translate the xt into the address of the data field. When you execute
first-word, it will display 123. When you execute
second-word it will display -1.
In the examples above the stack comment after the DOES> specifies
the stack effect of the defined words, not the stack effect of the
following code (the following code expects the address of the body on
the top of stack, which is not reflected in the stack comment). This is
the convention that I use and recommend (it clashes a bit with using
locals declarations for stack effect specification, though).
CREATE..DOES>You may wonder how to use this feature. Here are some usage patterns:
When you see a sequence of code occurring several times, and you can
identify a meaning, you will factor it out as a colon definition. When
you see similar colon definitions, you can factor them using
CREATE..DOES>. E.g., an assembler usually defines several words
that look very similar:
: ori, ( reg-target reg-source n -- )
0 asm-reg-reg-imm ;
: andi, ( reg-target reg-source n -- )
1 asm-reg-reg-imm ;
This could be factored with:
: reg-reg-imm ( op-code -- )
CREATE ,
DOES> ( reg-target reg-source n -- )
@ asm-reg-reg-imm ;
0 reg-reg-imm ori,
1 reg-reg-imm andi,
Another view of CREATE..DOES> is to consider it as a crude way to
supply a part of the parameters for a word (known as currying in
the functional language community). E.g., + needs two
parameters. Creating versions of + with one parameter fixed can
be done like this:
: curry+ ( n1 "name" -- )
CREATE ,
DOES> ( n2 -- n1+n2 )
@ + ;
3 curry+ 3+
-2 curry+ 2-
CREATE..DOES>
DOES> compilation colon-sys1 -- colon-sys2 ; run-time nest-sys -- core ``does''
This means that you need not use CREATE and DOES> in the
same definition; you can put the DOES>-part in a separate
definition. This allows us to, e.g., select among different DOES>-parts:
: does1
DOES> ( ... -- ... )
... ;
: does2
DOES> ( ... -- ... )
... ;
: def-word ( ... -- ... )
create ...
IF
does1
ELSE
does2
ENDIF ;
In this example, the selection of whether to use does1 or
does2 is made at definition-time; at the time that the child word is
CREATEd.
In a standard program you can apply a DOES>-part only if the last
word was defined with CREATE. In Gforth, the DOES>-part
will override the behaviour of the last word defined in any case. In a
standard program, you can use DOES> only in a colon
definition. In Gforth, you can also use it in interpretation state, in a
kind of one-shot mode; for example:
CREATE name ( ... -- ... ) initialization DOES> code ;
is equivalent to the standard:
:noname
DOES>
code ;
CREATE name EXECUTE ( ... -- ... )
initialization
>body xt -- a_addr core ``>body''
Get the address of the body of the word represented by xt (the address of the word's data field).
The MIPS disassembler (`arch/mips/disasm.fs') contains many words for disassembling instructions, that follow a very repetetive scheme:
:noname disasm-operands s" inst-name" type ; entry-num cells table + !
Of course, this inspires the idea to factor out the commonalities to allow a definition like
disasm-operands entry-num table define-inst inst-name
The parameters disasm-operands and table are usually correlated. Moreover, before I wrote the disassembler, there already existed code that defines instructions like this:
entry-num inst-format inst-name
This code comes from the assembler and resides in `arch/mips/insts.fs'.
So I had to define the inst-format words that performed the scheme above when executed. At first I chose to use run-time code-generation:
: inst-format ( entry-num "name" -- ; compiled code: addr w -- ) :noname Postpone disasm-operands name Postpone sliteral Postpone type Postpone ; swap cells table + ! ;
Note that this supplies the other two parameters of the scheme above.
An alternative would have been to write this using
create/does>:
: inst-format ( entry-num "name" -- ) here name string, ( entry-num c-addr ) \ parse and save "name" noname create , ( entry-num ) latestxt swap cells table + ! does> ( addr w -- ) \ disassemble instruction w at addr @ >r disasm-operands r> count type ;
Somehow the first solution is simpler, mainly because it's simpler to
shift a string from definition-time to use-time with sliteral
than with string, and friends.
I wrote a lot of words following this scheme and soon thought about factoring out the commonalities among them. Note that this uses a two-level defining word, i.e., a word that defines ordinary defining words.
This time a solution involving postpone and friends seemed more
difficult (try it as an exercise), so I decided to use a
create/does> word; since I was already at it, I also used
create/does> for the lower level (try using
postpone etc. as an exercise), resulting in the following
definition:
: define-format ( disasm-xt table-xt -- )
\ define an instruction format that uses disasm-xt for
\ disassembling and enters the defined instructions into table
\ table-xt
create 2,
does> ( u "inst" -- )
\ defines an anonymous word for disassembling instruction inst,
\ and enters it as u-th entry into table-xt
2@ swap here name string, ( u table-xt disasm-xt c-addr ) \ remember string
noname create 2, \ define anonymous word
execute latestxt swap ! \ enter xt of defined word into table-xt
does> ( addr w -- )
\ disassemble instruction w at addr
2@ >r ( addr w disasm-xt R: c-addr )
execute ( R: c-addr ) \ disassemble operands
r> count type ; \ print name
Note that the tables here (in contrast to above) do the cells +
by themselves (that's why you have to pass an xt). This word is used in
the following way:
' disasm-operands ' table define-format inst-format
As shown above, the defined instruction format is then used like this:
entry-num inst-format inst-name
In terms of currying, this kind of two-level defining word provides the
parameters in three stages: first disasm-operands and table,
then entry-num and inst-name, finally addr w, i.e.,
the instruction to be disassembled.
Of course this did not quite fit all the instruction format names used in `insts.fs', so I had to define a few wrappers that conditioned the parameters into the right form.
If you have trouble following this section, don't worry. First, this is
involved and takes time (and probably some playing around) to
understand; second, this is the first two-level
create/does> word I have written in seventeen years of
Forth; and if I did not have `insts.fs' to start with, I may well
have elected to use just a one-level defining word (with some repeating
of parameters when using the defining word). So it is not necessary to
understand this, but it may improve your understanding of Forth.
Const-does>
A frequent use of create...does> is for transferring some
values from definition-time to run-time. Gforth supports this use with
doc-const-does>
A typical use of this word is:
: curry+ ( n1 "name" -- )
1 0 CONST-DOES> ( n2 -- n1+n2 )
+ ;
3 curry+ 3+
Here the 1 0 means that 1 cell and 0 floats are transferred from
definition to run-time.
The advantages of using const-does> are:
does>, you have to introduce a @ that cannot
be optimized away (because you could change the data using
>body...!); const-does> avoids this problem.
An ANS Forth implementation of const-does> is available in
`compat/const-does.fs'.
The defining word Defer allows you to define a word by name
without defining its behaviour; the definition of its behaviour is
deferred. Here are two situation where this can be useful:
In the following example, foo always invokes the version of
greet that prints "Good morning" whilst bar
always invokes the version that prints "Hello". There is no way
of getting foo to use the later version without re-ordering the
source code and recompiling it.
: greet ." Good morning" ; : foo ... greet ... ; : greet ." Hello" ; : bar ... greet ... ;
This problem can be solved by defining greet as a Deferred
word. The behaviour of a Deferred word can be defined and
redefined at any time by using IS to associate the xt of a
previously-defined word with it. The previous example becomes:
Defer greet ( -- ) : foo ... greet ... ; : bar ... greet ... ; : greet1 ( -- ) ." Good morning" ; : greet2 ( -- ) ." Hello" ; ' greet2 <IS> greet \ make greet behave like greet2
@progstyle You should write a stack comment for every deferred word, and put only XTs into deferred words that conform to this stack effect. Otherwise it's too difficult to use the deferred word.
A deferred word can be used to improve the statistics-gathering example
from section User-defined Defining Words; rather than edit the
application's source code to change every : to a my:, do
this:
: real: : ; \ retain access to the original defer : \ redefine as a deferred word ' my: <IS> : \ use special version of : \ \ load application here \ ' real: <IS> : \ go back to the original
One thing to note is that <IS> consumes its name when it is
executed. If you want to specify the name at compile time, use
[IS]:
: set-greet ( xt -- ) [IS] greet ; ' greet1 set-greet
A deferred word can only inherit execution semantics from the xt (because that is all that an xt can represent -- for more discussion of this see section Tokens for Words); by default it will have default interpretation and compilation semantics deriving from this execution semantics. However, you can change the interpretation and compilation semantics of the deferred word in the usual ways:
: bar .... ; compile-only Defer fred immediate Defer jim ' bar <IS> jim \ jim has default semantics ' bar <IS> fred \ fred is immediate
Defer "name" -- gforth ``Defer''
<IS> "name" xt -- gforth ``<IS>''
Changes the deferred word name to execute xt.
[IS] compilation "name" -- ; run-time xt -- gforth ``bracket-is''
At run-time, changes the deferred word name to
execute xt.
IS xt "name" -- gforth ``IS''
A combined word made up from <IS> and [IS].
What's interpretation "name" -- xt; compilation "name" -- ; run-time -- xt gforth ``What's''
Xt is the XT that is currently assigned to name.
defers compilation "name" -- ; run-time ... -- ... gforth ``defers''
Compiles the present contents of the deferred word name into the current definition. I.e., this produces static binding as if name was not deferred.
Definitions in ANS Forth for defer, <is> and [is]
are provided in `compat/defer.fs'.
The defining word Alias allows you to define a word by name that
has the same behaviour as some other word. Here are two situation where
this can be useful:
Root word list
in the Gforth source).
THEN and ENDIF are
aliases).
Like deferred words, an alias has default compilation and interpretation
semantics at the beginning (not the modifications of the other word),
but you can change them in the usual ways (immediate,
compile-only). For example:
: foo ... ; immediate ' foo Alias bar \ bar is not an immediate word ' foo Alias fooby immediate \ fooby is an immediate word
Words that are aliases have the same xt, different headers in the
dictionary, and consequently different name tokens (see section Tokens for Words) and possibly different immediate flags. An alias can only have
default or immediate compilation semantics; you can define aliases for
combined words with interpret/compile: -- see section Combined Words.
Alias xt "name" -- gforth ``Alias''
The interpretation semantics of a (named) word are what the text
interpreter does when it encounters the word in interpret state. It also
appears in some other contexts, e.g., the execution token returned by
' word identifies the interpretation semantics of word
(in other words, ' word execute is equivalent to
interpret-state text interpretation of word).
The compilation semantics of a (named) word are what the text
interpreter does when it encounters the word in compile state. It also
appears in other contexts, e.g, POSTPONE word
compiles(17) the compilation semantics of word.
The standard also talks about execution semantics. They are used
only for defining the interpretation and compilation semantics of many
words. By default, the interpretation semantics of a word are to
execute its execution semantics, and the compilation semantics of
a word are to compile, its execution semantics.(18)
Unnamed words (see section Anonymous Definitions) cannot be encountered by
the text interpreter, ticked, or postponed, so they have no
interpretation or compilation semantics. Their behaviour is represented
by their XT (see section Tokens for Words), and we call it execution
semantics, too.
You can change the semantics of the most-recently defined word:
immediate -- core ``immediate''
Make the compilation semantics of a word be to execute
the execution semantics.
compile-only -- gforth ``compile-only''
Remove the interpretation semantics of a word.
restrict -- gforth ``restrict''
A synonym for compile-only
By convention, words with non-default compilation semantics (e.g.,
immediate words) often have names surrounded with brackets (e.g.,
['], see section Execution token).
Note that ticking (') a compile-only word gives an error
("Interpreting a compile-only word").
Gforth allows you to define combined words -- words that have an arbitrary combination of interpretation and compilation semantics.
interpret/compile: interp-xt comp-xt "name" -- gforth ``interpret/compile:''
This feature was introduced for implementing TO and S". I
recommend that you do not define such words, as cute as they may be:
they make it hard to get at both parts of the word in some contexts.
E.g., assume you want to get an execution token for the compilation
part. Instead, define two words, one that embodies the interpretation
part, and one that embodies the compilation part. Once you have done
that, you can define a combined word with interpret/compile: for
the convenience of your users.
You might try to use this feature to provide an optimizing implementation of the default compilation semantics of a word. For example, by defining:
:noname foo bar ; :noname POSTPONE foo POSTPONE bar ; interpret/compile: opti-foobar
as an optimizing version of:
: foobar
foo bar ;
Unfortunately, this does not work correctly with [compile],
because [compile] assumes that the compilation semantics of all
interpret/compile: words are non-default. I.e., [compile]
opti-foobar would compile compilation semantics, whereas
[compile] foobar would compile interpretation semantics.
@anchor{state-smartness}
Some people try to use state-smart words to emulate the feature provided
by interpret/compile: (words are state-smart if they check
STATE during execution). E.g., they would try to code
foobar like this:
: foobar
STATE @
IF ( compilation state )
POSTPONE foo POSTPONE bar
ELSE
foo bar
ENDIF ; immediate
Although this works if foobar is only processed by the text
interpreter, it does not work in other contexts (like ' or
POSTPONE). E.g., ' foobar will produce an execution token
for a state-smart word, not for the interpretation semantics of the
original foobar; when you execute this execution token (directly
with EXECUTE or indirectly through COMPILE,) in compile
state, the result will not be what you expected (i.e., it will not
perform foo bar). State-smart words are a bad idea. Simply don't
write them(19)!
It is also possible to write defining words that define words with arbitrary combinations of interpretation and compilation semantics. In general, they look like this:
: def-word
create-interpret/compile
code1
interpretation>
code2
<interpretation
compilation>
code3
<compilation ;
For a word defined with def-word, the interpretation
semantics are to push the address of the body of word and perform
code2, and the compilation semantics are to push the address of
the body of word and perform code3. E.g., constant
can also be defined like this (except that the defined constants don't
behave correctly when [compile]d):
: constant ( n "name" -- )
create-interpret/compile
,
interpretation> ( -- n )
@
<interpretation
compilation> ( compilation. -- ; run-time. -- n )
@ postpone literal
<compilation ;
create-interpret/compile "name" -- gforth ``create-interpret/compile''
interpretation> compilation. -- orig colon-sys gforth ``interpretation>''
<interpretation compilation. orig colon-sys -- gforth ``<interpretation''
compilation> compilation. -- orig colon-sys gforth ``compilation>''
<compilation compilation. orig colon-sys -- gforth ``<compilation''
Words defined with interpret/compile: and
create-interpret/compile have an extended header structure that
differs from other words; however, unless you try to access them with
plain address arithmetic, you should not notice this. Words for
accessing the header structure usually know how to deal with this; e.g.,
' word >body also gives you the body of a word created
with create-interpret/compile.
This section describes the creation and use of tokens that represent words.
An execution token (XT) represents some behaviour of a word.
You can use execute to invoke this behaviour.
You can use ' to get an execution token that represents the
interpretation semantics of a named word:
5 ' . ( n xt ) execute ( ) \ execute the xt (i.e., ".")
' "name" -- xt core ``tick''
xt represents name's interpretation
semantics. Perform -14 throw if the word has no
interpretation semantics.
' parses at run-time; there is also a word ['] that parses
when it is compiled, and compiles the resulting XT:
: foo ['] . execute ; 5 foo : bar ' execute ; \ by contrast, 5 bar . \ ' parses "." when bar executes
['] compilation. "name" -- ; run-time. -- xt core ``bracket-tick''
xt represents name's interpretation
semantics. Perform -14 throw if the word has no
interpretation semantics.
If you want the execution token of word, write ['] word
in compiled code and ' word in interpreted code. Gforth's
' and ['] behave somewhat unusually by complaining about
compile-only words (because these words have no interpretation
semantics). You might get what you want by using COMP' word
DROP or [COMP'] word DROP (for details see section Compilation token).
Another way to get an XT is :noname or latestxt
(see section Anonymous Definitions). For anonymous words this gives an xt
for the only behaviour the word has (the execution semantics). For
named words, latestxt produces an XT for the same behaviour it
would produce if the word was defined anonymously.
:noname ." hello" ; execute
An XT occupies one cell and can be manipulated like any other cell.
In ANS Forth the XT is just an abstract data type (i.e., defined by the operations that produce or consume it). For old hands: In Gforth, the XT is implemented as a code field address (CFA).
execute xt -- core ``execute''
Perform the semantics represented by the execution token, xt.
perform a-addr -- gforth ``perform''
@ execute.
Gforth represents the compilation semantics of a named word by a
compilation token consisting of two cells: w xt. The top cell
xt is an execution token. The compilation semantics represented by
the compilation token can be performed with execute, which
consumes the whole compilation token, with an additional stack effect
determined by the represented compilation semantics.
At present, the w part of a compilation token is an execution token,
and the xt part represents either execute or
compile,(20). However, don't rely on that
knowledge, unless necessary; future versions of Gforth may introduce
unusual compilation tokens (e.g., a compilation token that represents
the compilation semantics of a literal).
You can perform the compilation semantics represented by the compilation
token with execute. You can compile the compilation semantics
with postpone,. I.e., COMP' word postpone, is
equivalent to postpone word.
[COMP'] compilation "name" -- ; run-time -- w xt gforth ``bracket-comp-tick''
Compilation token w xt represents name's compilation semantics.
COMP' "name" -- w xt gforth ``comp-tick''
Compilation token w xt represents name's compilation semantics.
postpone, w xt -- gforth ``postpone-comma''
Compile the compilation semantics represented by the compilation token w xt.
Gforth represents named words by the name token, (nt). Name token is an abstract data type that occurs as argument or result of the words below.
The closest thing to the nt in older Forth systems is the name field address (NFA), but there are significant differences: in older Forth systems each word had a unique NFA, LFA, CFA and PFA (in this order, or LFA, NFA, CFA, PFA) and there were words for getting from one to the next. In contrast, in Gforth 0...n nts correspond to one xt; there is a link field in the structure identified by the name token, but searching usually uses a hash table external to these structures; the name in Gforth has a cell-wide count-and-flags field, and the nt is not implemented as the address of that count field.
find-name c-addr u -- nt | 0 gforth ``find-name''
Find the name c-addr u in the current search order. Return its nt, if found, otherwise 0.
latest -- nt gforth ``latest''
nt is the name token of the last word defined; it is 0 if the last word has no name.
>name xt -- nt|0 gforth ``to-name''
tries to find the name token nt of the word represented by xt; returns 0 if it fails. This word is not absolutely reliable, it may give false positives and produce wrong nts.
name>int nt -- xt gforth ``name>int''
xt represents the interpretation semantics of the word
nt. If nt has no interpretation semantics (i.e. is
compile-only), xt is the execution token for
ticking-compile-only-error, which performs -2048 throw.
name?int nt -- xt gforth ``name?int''
Like name>int, but perform -2048 throw if nt
has no interpretation semantics.
name>comp nt -- w xt gforth ``name>comp''
w xt is the compilation token for the word nt.
name>string nt -- addr count gforth ``head-to-string''
addr count is the name of the word represented by nt.
id. nt -- gforth ``id.''
Print the name of the word represented by nt.
.name nt -- unknown ``.name''
Gforth <=0.5.0 name for id..
.id nt -- unknown ``.id''
F83 name for id..
In contrast to most other languages, Forth has no strict boundary
between compilation and run-time. E.g., you can run arbitrary code
between defining words (or for computing data used by defining words
like constant). Moreover, Immediate (see section Interpretation and Compilation Semantics and [...] (see below) allow
running arbitrary code while compiling a colon definition (exception:
you must not allot dictionary space).
The simplest and most frequent example is to compute a literal during compilation. E.g., the following definition prints an array of strings, one string per line:
: .strings ( addr u -- ) \ gforth
2* cells bounds U+DO
cr i 2@ type
2 cells +LOOP ;
With a simple-minded compiler like Gforth's, this computes 2
cells on every loop iteration. You can compute this value once and for
all at compile time and compile it into the definition like this:
: .strings ( addr u -- ) \ gforth
2* cells bounds U+DO
cr i 2@ type
[ 2 cells ] literal +LOOP ;
[ switches the text interpreter to interpret state (you will get
an ok prompt if you type this example interactively and insert a
newline between [ and ]), so it performs the
interpretation semantics of 2 cells; this computes a number.
] switches the text interpreter back into compile state. It then
performs Literal's compilation semantics, which are to compile
this number into the current word. You can decompile the word with
see .strings to see the effect on the compiled code.
You can also optimize the 2* cells into [ 2 cells ] literal
* in this way.
[ -- core ``left-bracket''
Enter interpretation state. Immediate word.
] -- core ``right-bracket''
Enter compilation state.
Literal compilation n -- ; run-time -- n core ``Literal''
Compilation semantics: compile the run-time semantics.
Run-time Semantics: push n.
Interpretation semantics: undefined.
]L compilation: n -- ; run-time: -- n gforth ``]L''
equivalent to ] literal
There are also words for compiling other data types than single cells as literals:
2Literal compilation w1 w2 -- ; run-time -- w1 w2 double ``two-literal''
Compile appropriate code such that, at run-time, cell pair w1, w2 are placed on the stack. Interpretation semantics are undefined.
FLiteral compilation r -- ; run-time -- r float ``f-literal''
Compile appropriate code such that, at run-time, r is placed on the (floating-point) stack. Interpretation semantics are undefined.
SLiteral Compilation c-addr1 u ; run-time -- c-addr2 u string ``SLiteral''
Compilation: compile the string specified by c-addr1, u into the current definition. Run-time: return c-addr2 u describing the address and length of the string.
You might be tempted to pass data from outside a colon definition to the
inside on the data stack. This does not work, because : puhes a
colon-sys, making stuff below unaccessible. E.g., this does not work:
5 : foo literal ; \ error: "unstructured"
Instead, you have to pass the value in some other way, e.g., through a variable:
variable temp 5 temp ! : foo [ temp @ ] literal ;
Literal and friends compile data values into the current
definition. You can also write words that compile other words into the
current definition. E.g.,
: compile-+ ( -- ) \ compiled code: ( n1 n2 -- n ) POSTPONE + ; : foo ( n1 n2 -- n ) [ compile-+ ] ; 1 2 foo .
This is equivalent to : foo + ; (see foo to check this).
What happens in this example? Postpone compiles the compilation
semantics of + into compile-+; later the text interpreter
executes compile-+ and thus the compilation semantics of +, which
compile (the execution semantics of) + into
foo.(21)
postpone "name" -- core ``postpone''
Compiles the compilation semantics of name.
[compile] compilation "name" -- ; run-time ? -- ? core-ext ``bracket-compile''
Compiling words like compile-+ are usually immediate (or similar)
so you do not have to switch to interpret state to execute them;
mopifying the last example accordingly produces:
: [compile-+] ( compilation: --; interpretation: -- ) \ compiled code: ( n1 n2 -- n ) POSTPONE + ; immediate : foo ( n1 n2 -- n ) [compile-+] ; 1 2 foo .
Immediate compiling words are similar to macros in other languages (in particular, Lisp). The important differences to macros in, e.g., C are:
postpone etc. deal with the language at a
higher level than strings; name binding happens at macro definition
time, so you can avoid the pitfalls of name collisions that can happen
in C macros. Of course, Forth is a liberal language and also allows to
shoot yourself in the foot with text-interpreted macros like
: [compile-+] s" +" evaluate ; immediateApart from binding the name at macro use time, using
evaluate
also makes your definition state-smart (@xref{state-smartness}).
You may want the macro to compile a number into a word. The word to do
it is literal, but you have to postpone it, so its
compilation semantics take effect when the macro is executed, not when
it is compiled:
: [compile-5] ( -- ) \ compiled code: ( -- n ) 5 POSTPONE literal ; immediate : foo [compile-5] ; foo .
You may want to pass parameters to a macro, that the macro should
compile into the current definition. If the parameter is a number, then
you can use postpone literal (similar for other values).
If you want to pass a word that is to be compiled, the usual way is to
pass an execution token and compile, it:
: twice1 ( xt -- ) \ compiled code: ... -- ... dup compile, compile, ; : 2+ ( n1 -- n2 ) [ ' 1+ twice1 ] ;
compile, xt -- core-ext ``compile-comma''
Compile the word represented by the execution token xt into the current definition.
An alternative available in Gforth, that allows you to pass compile-only words as parameters is to use the compilation token (see section Compilation token). The same example in this technique:
: twice ( ... ct -- ... ) \ compiled code: ... -- ... 2dup 2>r execute 2r> execute ; : 2+ ( n1 -- n2 ) [ comp' 1+ twice ] ;
In the example above 2>r and 2r> ensure that twice
works even if the executed compilation semantics has an effect on the
data stack.
You can also define complete definitions with these words; this provides
an alternative to using does> (see section User-defined Defining Words). E.g., instead of
: curry+ ( n1 "name" -- )
CREATE ,
DOES> ( n2 -- n1+n2 )
@ + ;
you could define
: curry+ ( n1 "name" -- ) \ name execution: ( n2 -- n1+n2 ) >r : r> POSTPONE literal POSTPONE + POSTPONE ; ; -3 curry+ 3- see 3-
The sequence >r : r> is necessary, because : puts a
colon-sys on the data stack that makes everything below it unaccessible.
This way of writing defining words is sometimes more, sometimes less
convenient than using does> (see section Advanced does> usage example). One advantage of this method is that it can be optimized
better, because the compiler knows that the value compiled with
literal is fixed, whereas the data associated with a
created word can be changed.
The text interpreter(22) is an endless loop that processes input from the current input device. It is also called the outer interpreter, in contrast to the inner interpreter (see section Engine) which executes the compiled Forth code on interpretive implementations.
The text interpreter operates in one of two states: interpret
state and compile state. The current state is defined by the
aptly-named variable state.
This section starts by describing how the text interpreter behaves when it is in interpret state, processing input from the user input device -- the keyboard. This is the mode that a Forth system is in after it starts up.
The text interpreter works from an area of memory called the input buffer(23), which stores your keyboard input when you press the RET key. Starting at the beginning of the input buffer, it skips leading spaces (called delimiters) then parses a string (a sequence of non-space characters) until it reaches either a space character or the end of the buffer. Having parsed a string, it makes two attempts to process it:
If both attempts fail, or if the word is found in the dictionary but has
no interpretation semantics(24) the text interpreter discards the
remainder of the input buffer, issues an error message and waits for
more input. If one of the attempts succeeds, the text interpreter
repeats the parsing process until the whole of the input buffer has been
processed, at which point it prints the status message " ok"
and waits for more input.
The text interpreter keeps track of its position in the input buffer by
updating a variable called >IN (pronounced "to-in"). The value
of >IN starts out as 0, indicating an offset of 0 from the start
of the input buffer. The region from offset >IN @ to the end of
the input buffer is called the parse area(25).
This example shows how >IN changes as the text interpreter parses
the input buffer:
: remaining >IN @ SOURCE 2 PICK - -ROT + SWAP CR ." ->" TYPE ." <-" ; IMMEDIATE 1 2 3 remaining + remaining . : foo 1 2 3 remaining SWAP remaining ;
The result is:
->+ remaining .<- ->.<-5 ok ->SWAP remaining ;-< ->;<- ok
The value of >IN can also be modified by a word in the input
buffer that is executed by the text interpreter. This means that a word
can "trick" the text interpreter into either skipping a section of the
input buffer(26) or into parsing a
section twice. For example:
: lat ." <<foo>>" ; : flat ." <<bar>>" >IN DUP @ 3 - SWAP ! ;
When flat is executed, this output is produced(27):
<<bar>><<foo>>
This technique can be used to work around some of the interoperability problems of parsing words. Of course, it's better to avoid parsing words where possible.
Two important notes about the behaviour of the text interpreter:
When the text interpreter is in compile state, its behaviour changes in these ways:
state is modified to put the text interpreter
back into interpret state.
compiled" rather than " ok".
When the text interpreter is using an input device other than the keyboard, its behaviour changes in these ways:
ok" or " compiled" messages each
time the parse area is emptied.
You can read about this in more detail in section Input Sources.
>in unknown ``>in''
input-var variable -- a-addr is the address of a
cell containing the char offset from the start of the input
buffer to the start of the parse area.
source -- addr u core-ext,file ``source''
Return address addr and length u of the current input buffer
tib unknown ``tib''
#tib unknown ``#tib''
input-var variable -- a-addr is the address of a
cell containing the number of characters in the terminal input
buffer. OBSOLESCENT: source superceeds the function of
this word.
By default, the text interpreter processes input from the user input device (the keyboard) when Forth starts up. The text interpreter can process input from any of these sources:
evaluate.
A program can identify the current input device from the values of
source-id and blk.
source-id -- 0 | -1 | fileid core-ext,file ``source-i-d''
Return 0 (the input source is the user input device), -1 (the
input source is a string being processed by evaluate) or
a fileid (the input source is the file specified by
fileid).
blk unknown ``blk''
input-var variable -- This cell contains the current
block number
save-input -- x1 .. xn n core-ext ``save-input''
The n entries xn - x1 describe the current state of the
input source specification, in some platform-dependent way that can
be used by restore-input.
restore-input x1 .. xn n -- flag core-ext ``restore-input''
Attempt to restore the input source specification to the state described by the n entries xn - x1. flag is true if the restore fails. In Gforth with the new input code, it fails only with a flag that can be used to throw again; it is also possible to save and restore between different active input streams. Note that closing the input streams must happen in the reverse order as they have been opened, but in between everything is allowed.
evaluate ... addr u -- ... core,block ``evaluate''
Save the current input source specification. Store -1 in
source-id and 0 in blk. Set >IN to
0 and make the string c-addr u the input source and
input buffer. Interpret. When the parse area is empty, restore the
input source specification.
query -- core-ext ``query''
Make the user input device the input source. Receive input into
the Terminal Input Buffer. Set >IN to zero. OBSOLESCENT:
superceeded by accept.
This section describes the rules that the text interpreter uses when it tries to convert a string into a number.
Let <digit> represent any character that is a legal digit in the current number base(28).
Let <decimal digit> represent any character in the range 0-9.
Let {a b} represent the optional presence of any of the characters in the braces (a or b or neither).
Let * represent any number of instances of the previous character (including none).
Let any other character represent itself.
Now, the conversion rules are:
By default, the number base used for integer number conversion is given
by the contents of the variable base. Note that a lot of
confusion can result from unexpected values of base. If you
change base anywhere, make sure to save the old value and restore
it afterwards. In general I recommend keeping base decimal, and
using the prefixes described below for the popular non-decimal bases.
dpl -- a-addr gforth ``dpl''
User variable -- a-addr is the address of a cell that stores the
position of the decimal point in the most recent numeric conversion.
Initialised to -1. After the conversion of a number containing no
decimal point, dpl is -1. After the conversion of 2. it holds
0. After the conversion of 234123.9 it contains 1, and so forth.
base -- a-addr core ``base''
User variable -- a-addr is the address of a cell that stores the
number base used by default for number conversion during input and output.
hex -- core-ext ``hex''
Set base to &16 (hexadecimal).
decimal -- core ``decimal''
Set base to &10 (decimal).
Gforth allows you to override the value of base by using a
prefix(29) before the first digit
of an (integer) number. Four prefixes are supported:
& -- decimal
% -- binary
$ -- hexadecimal
' -- base max-char+1
Here are some examples, with the equivalent decimal number shown after in braces:
-$41 (-65), %1001101 (205), %1001.0001 (145 - a double-precision number), 'AB (16706; ascii A is 65, ascii B is 66, number is 65*256 + 66), 'ab (24930; ascii a is 97, ascii B is 98, number is 97*256 + 98), &905 (905), $abc (2478), $ABC (2478).
Number conversion has a number of traps for the unwary:
base @ . -- the number base is always 10 in the current number
base. Instead, use something like base @ dec.
bin but it does not set the number base!
It is used to specify file types.
. of a double-precision number to be the
final character in the string. Gforth allows the . to be
anywhere after the first digit.
base is required to be decimal when
converting floating-point numbers. In Gforth, number conversion to
floating-point numbers always uses base &10, irrespective of the value
of base.
You can read numbers into your programs with the words described in section Input.
A standard program is not permitted to change state
explicitly. However, it can change state implicitly, using the
words [ and ]. When [ is executed it switches
state to interpret state, and therefore the text interpreter
starts interpreting. When ] is executed it switches state
to compile state and therefore the text interpreter starts
compiling. The most common usage for these words is for switching into
interpret state and back from within a colon definition; this technique
can be used to compile a literal (for an example, see section Literals) or
for conditional compilation (for an example, see section Interpreter Directives).
These words are usually used in interpret state; typically to control which parts of a source file are processed by the text interpreter. There are only a few ANS Forth Standard words, but Gforth supplements these with a rich set of immediate control structure words to compensate for the fact that the non-immediate versions can only be used in compile state (see section Control Structures). Typical usages:
FALSE Constant HAVE-ASSEMBLER . . HAVE-ASSEMBLER [IF] : ASSEMBLER-FEATURE ... ; [ENDIF] . . : SEE ... \ general-purpose SEE code [ HAVE-ASSEMBLER [IF] ] ... \ assembler-specific SEE code [ [ENDIF] ] ;
[IF] flag -- tools-ext ``bracket-if''
If flag is TRUE do nothing (and therefore
execute subsequent words as normal). If flag is FALSE,
parse and discard words from the parse
area (refilling it if necessary using
REFILL) including nested instances of [IF]..
[ELSE].. [THEN] and [IF].. [THEN]
until the balancing [ELSE] or [THEN] has been
parsed and discarded. Immediate word.
[ELSE] -- tools-ext ``bracket-else''
Parse and discard words from the parse
area (refilling it if necessary using
REFILL) including nested instances of [IF]..
[ELSE].. [THEN] and [IF].. [THEN]
until the balancing [THEN] has been parsed and discarded.
[ELSE] only gets executed if the balancing [IF]
was TRUE; if it was FALSE, [IF] would
have parsed and discarded the [ELSE], leaving the
subsequent words to be executed as normal.
Immediate word.
[THEN] -- tools-ext ``bracket-then''
Do nothing; used as a marker for other words to parse and discard up to. Immediate word.
[ENDIF] -- gforth ``bracket-end-if''
Do nothing; synonym for [THEN]
[IFDEF] "<spaces>name" -- gforth ``bracket-if-def''
If name is found in the current search-order, behave like
[IF] with a TRUE flag, otherwise behave like
[IF] with a FALSE flag. Immediate word.
[IFUNDEF] "<spaces>name" -- gforth ``bracket-if-un-def''
If name is not found in the current search-order, behave like
[IF] with a TRUE flag, otherwise behave like
[IF] with a FALSE flag. Immediate word.
[?DO] n-limit n-index -- gforth ``bracket-question-do''
[DO] n-limit n-index -- gforth ``bracket-do''
[FOR] n -- gforth ``bracket-for''
[LOOP] -- gforth ``bracket-loop''
[+LOOP] n -- gforth ``bracket-question-plus-loop''
[NEXT] n -- gforth ``bracket-next''
[BEGIN] -- gforth ``bracket-begin''
[UNTIL] flag -- gforth ``bracket-until''
[AGAIN] -- gforth ``bracket-again''
[WHILE] flag -- gforth ``bracket-while''
[REPEAT] -- gforth ``bracket-repeat''
The text interpreter reads from the input stream, which can come from
several sources (see section Input Sources). Some words, in particular
defining words, but also words like ', read parameters from the
input stream instead of from the stack.
Such words are called parsing words, because they parse the input stream. Parsing words are hard to use in other words, because it is hard to pass program-generated parameters through the input stream. They also usually have an unintuitive combination of interpretation and compilation semantics when implemented naively, leading to various approaches that try to produce a more intuitive behaviour (see section Combined Words).
It should be obvious by now that parsing words are a bad idea. If you want to implement a parsing word for convenience, also provide a factor of the word that does not parse, but takes the parameters on the stack. To implement the parsing word on top if it, you can use the following words:
parse char "ccc<char>" -- c-addr u core-ext ``parse''
Parse ccc, delimited by char, in the parse area. c-addr u specifies the parsed string within the parse area. If the parse area was empty, u is 0.
parse-word "name" -- c-addr u gforth ``parse-word''
Get the next word from the input buffer
name -- c-addr u gforth-obsolete ``name''
old name for parse-word
word char "<chars>ccc<char>-- c-addr core ``word''
Skip leading delimiters. Parse ccc, delimited by char, in the parse area. c-addr is the address of a transient region containing the parsed string in counted-string format. If the parse area was empty or contained no characters other than delimiters, the resulting string has zero length. A program may replace characters within the counted string. OBSOLESCENT: the counted string has a trailing space that is not included in its length.
\"-parse "string"<"> -- c-addr u unknown ``\"-parse''
parses string, translating \-escapes to characters (as in
C). The resulting string resides at here char+. The
supported \-escapes are: \a BEL (alert), \b
BS, \e ESC (not in C99), \f FF, \n newline,
\r CR, \t HT, \v VT, \" ",
\[0-7]+ octal numerical character value, \x[0-9a-f]+
hex numerical character value; a \ before any other
character represents that character (only ', \, ? in C99).
refill -- flag core-ext,block-ext,file-ext ``refill''
Attempt to fill the input buffer from the input source. When
the input source is the user input device, attempt to receive
input into the terminal input device. If successful, make the
result the input buffer, set >IN to 0 and return true;
otherwise return false. When the input source is a block, add 1
to the value of BLK to make the next block the input
source and current input buffer, and set >IN to 0;
return true if the new value of BLK is a valid block
number, false otherwise. When the input source is a text file,
attempt to read the next line from the file. If successful,
make the result the current input buffer, set >IN to 0
and return true; otherwise, return false. A successful result
includes receipt of a line containing 0 characters.
Conversely, if you have the bad luck (or lack of foresight) to have to deal with parsing words without having such factors, how do you pass a string that is not in the input stream to it?
execute-parsing ... addr u xt -- ... unknown ``execute-parsing''
Make addr u the current input source, execute xt (
... -- ... ), then restore the previous input source.
If you want to run a parsing word on a file, the following word should help:
execute-parsing-file i*x fileid xt -- j*x unknown ``execute-parsing-file''
Make fileid the current input source, execute xt ( i*x
-- j*x ), then restore the previous input source.
A wordlist is a list of named words; you can add new words and look up
words by name (and you can remove words in a restricted way with
markers). Every named (and revealed) word is in one wordlist.
The text interpreter searches the wordlists present in the search order (a stack of wordlists), from the top to the bottom. Within each wordlist, the search starts conceptually at the newest word; i.e., if two words in a wordlist have the same name, the newer word is found.
New words are added to the compilation wordlist (aka current wordlist).
A word list is identified by a cell-sized word list identifier (wid) in much the same way as a file is identified by a file handle. The numerical value of the wid has no (portable) meaning, and might change from session to session.
The ANS Forth "Search order" word set is intended to provide a set of
low-level tools that allow various different schemes to be
implemented. Gforth also provides vocabulary, a traditional Forth
word. `compat/vocabulary.fs' provides an implementation in ANS
Forth.
forth-wordlist -- wid search ``forth-wordlist''
Constant -- wid identifies the word list that includes all of the standard words
provided by Gforth. When Gforth is invoked, this word list is the compilation word
list and is at the top of the search order.
definitions -- search ``definitions''
Set the compilation word list to be the same as the word list that is currently at the top of the search order.
get-current -- wid search ``get-current''
wid is the identifier of the current compilation word list.
set-current wid -- search ``set-current''
Set the compilation word list to the word list identified by wid.
get-order -- widn .. wid1 n search ``get-order''
Copy the search order to the data stack. The current search order has n entries, of which wid1 represents the wordlist that is searched first (the word list at the top of the search order) and widn represents the wordlist that is searched last.
set-order widn .. wid1 n -- search ``set-order''
If n=0, empty the search order. If n=-1, set the
search order to the implementation-defined minimum search order
(for Gforth, this is the word list Root). Otherwise,
replace the existing search order with the n wid entries
such that wid1 represents the word list that will be
searched first and widn represents the word list that will
be searched last.
wordlist -- wid search ``wordlist''
Create a new, empty word list represented by wid.
table -- wid gforth ``table''
Create a case-sensitive wordlist.
>order wid -- gforth ``to-order''
Push wid on the search order.
previous -- search-ext ``previous''
Drop the wordlist at the top of the search order.
also -- search-ext ``also''
Like DUP for the search order. Usually used before a
vocabulary (e.g., also Forth); the combined effect is to push
the wordlist represented by the vocabulary on the search order.
Forth -- search-ext ``Forth''
Replace the wid at the top of the search order with the
wid associated with the word list forth-wordlist.
Only -- search-ext ``Only''
Set the search order to the implementation-defined minimum search
order (for Gforth, this is the word list Root).
order -- search-ext ``order''
Print the search order and the compilation word list. The word lists are printed in the order in which they are searched (which is reversed with respect to the conventional way of displaying stacks). The compilation word list is displayed last.
find c-addr -- xt +-1 | c-addr 0 core,search ``find''
Search all word lists in the current search order for the
definition named by the counted string at c-addr. If the
definition is not found, return 0. If the definition is found
return 1 (if the definition has non-default compilation
semantics) or -1 (if the definition has default compilation
semantics). The xt returned in interpret state represents
the interpretation semantics. The xt returned in compile
state represented either the compilation semantics (for
non-default compilation semantics) or the run-time semantics
that the compilation semantics would compile, (for
default compilation semantics). The ANS Forth standard does
not specify clearly what the returned xt represents (and
also talks about immediacy instead of non-default compilation
semantics), so this word is questionable in portable programs.
If non-portability is ok, find-name and friends are
better (see section Name token).
search-wordlist c-addr count wid -- 0 | xt +-1 search ``search-wordlist''
Search the word list identified by wid for the definition named by the string at c-addr count. If the definition is not found, return 0. If the definition is found return 1 (if the definition is immediate) or -1 (if the definition is not immediate) together with the xt. In Gforth, the xt returned represents the interpretation semantics. ANS Forth does not specify clearly what xt represents.
words -- tools ``words''
Display a list of all of the definitions in the word list at the top of the search order.
vlist -- gforth ``vlist''
Old (pre-Forth-83) name for WORDS.
Root -- gforth ``Root''
Add the root wordlist to the search order stack. This vocabulary makes up the minimum search order and contains only a search-order words.
Vocabulary "name" -- gforth ``Vocabulary''
Create a definition "name" and associate a new word list with it. The run-time effect of "name" is to replace the wid at the top of the search order with the wid associated with the new word list.
seal -- gforth ``seal''
Remove all word lists from the search order stack other than the word list that is currently on the top of the search order stack.
vocs -- gforth ``vocs''
List vocabularies and wordlists defined in the system.
current -- addr gforth ``current''
Variable -- holds the wid of the compilation word list.
context -- addr gforth ``context''
context @ is the wid of the word list at the
top of the search order.
Here is an example of creating and using a new wordlist using ANS Forth words:
wordlist constant my-new-words-wordlist : my-new-words get-order nip my-new-words-wordlist swap set-order ; \ add it to the search order also my-new-words \ alternatively, add it to the search order and make it \ the compilation word list also my-new-words definitions \ type "order" to see the problem
The problem with this example is that order has no way to
associate the name my-new-words with the wid of the word list (in
Gforth, order and vocs will display ??? for a wid
that has no associated name). There is no Standard way of associating a
name with a wid.
In Gforth, this example can be re-coded using vocabulary, which
associates a name with a wid:
vocabulary my-new-words \ add it to the search order also my-new-words \ alternatively, add it to the search order and make it \ the compilation word list my-new-words definitions \ type "order" to see that the problem is solved
Here are some reasons why people use wordlists:
CODE word is defined).
forth-wordlist or some other common wordlist) and a set
of helper words used just for the implementation (hidden in a separate
wordlist). This keeps words' output smaller, separates
implementation and interface, and reduces the chance of name conflicts
within the common wordlist.
IF that generates conditional code for your target system. By
placing this definition in a different word list you can control whether
the host system's IF or the target system's IF get used in
any particular context by controlling the order of the word lists on the
search order stack.
The downsides of using wordlists are:
see can
help seeing which of several possible words the name resolves to in such
cases). See displays just the name of the words, not what
wordlist they belong to, so it might be misleading. Using unique names
is a better approach to avoid name conflicts.
The following example is from the garbage collector and uses wordlists to separate public words from helper words:
get-current ( wid )
vocabulary garbage-collector also garbage-collector definitions
... \ define helper words
( wid ) set-current \ restore original (i.e., public) compilation wordlist
... \ define the public (i.e., API) words
\ they can refer to the helper words
previous \ restore original search order (helper words become invisible)
ANS Forth introduced the idea of "environmental queries" as a way for a program running on a system to determine certain characteristics of the system. The Standard specifies a number of strings that might be recognised by a system.
The Standard requires that the header space used for environmental queries be distinct from the header space used for definitions.
Typically, environmental queries are supported by creating a set of
definitions in a word list that is only used during environmental
queries; that is what Gforth does. There is no Standard way of adding
definitions to the set of recognised environmental queries, but any
implementation that supports the loading of optional word sets must have
some mechanism for doing this (after loading the word set, the
associated environmental query string must return true). In
Gforth, the word list used to honour environmental queries can be
manipulated just like any other word list.
environment? c-addr u -- false / ... true core ``environment-query''
c-addr, u specify a counted string. If the string is not
recognised, return a false flag. Otherwise return a
true flag and some (string-specific) information about
the queried string.
environment-wordlist -- wid gforth ``environment-wordlist''
wid identifies the word list that is searched by environmental queries.
gforth -- c-addr u gforth-environment ``gforth''
Counted string representing a version string for this version of Gforth (for versions>0.3.0). The version strings of the various versions are guaranteed to be ordered lexicographically.
os-class -- c-addr u gforth-environment ``os-class''
Counted string representing a description of the host operating system.
Note that, whilst the documentation for (e.g.) gforth shows it
returning two items on the stack, querying it using environment?
will return an additional item; the true flag that shows that the
string was recognised.
Here are some examples of using environmental queries:
s" address-unit-bits" environment? 0=
[IF]
cr .( environmental attribute address-units-bits unknown... ) cr
[ELSE]
drop \ ensure balanced stack effect
[THEN]
\ this might occur in the prelude of a standard program that uses THROW
s" exception" environment? [IF]
0= [IF]
: throw abort" exception thrown" ;
[THEN]
[ELSE] \ we don't know, so make sure
: throw abort" exception thrown" ;
[THEN]
s" gforth" environment? [IF] .( Gforth version ) TYPE
[ELSE] .( Not Gforth..) [THEN]
\ a program using v*
s" gforth" environment? [IF]
s" 0.5.0" compare 0< [IF] \ v* is a primitive since 0.5.0
: v* ( f_addr1 nstride1 f_addr2 nstride2 ucount -- r )
>r swap 2swap swap 0e r> 0 ?DO
dup f over + 2swap dup f f* f+ over + 2swap
LOOP
2drop 2drop ;
[THEN]
[ELSE] \
: v* ( f_addr1 nstride1 f_addr2 nstride2 ucount -- r )
...
[THEN]
Here is an example of adding a definition to the environment word list:
get-current environment-wordlist set-current true constant block true constant block-ext set-current
You can see what definitions are in the environment word list like this:
environment-wordlist >order words previous
Gforth provides facilities for accessing files that are stored in the host operating system's file-system. Files that are processed by Gforth can be divided into two categories:
The simplest way to interpret the contents of a file is to use one of these two formats:
include mysource.fs s" mysource.fs" included
You usually want to include a file only if it is not included already (by, say, another source file). In that case, you can use one of these three formats:
require mysource.fs needs mysource.fs s" mysource.fs" required
It is good practice to write your source files such that interpreting them
does not change the stack. Source files designed in this way can be used with
required and friends without complications. For example:
1024 require foo.fs drop
Here you want to pass the argument 1024 (e.g., a buffer size) to
`foo.fs'. Interpreting `foo.fs' has the stack effect ( n -- n
), which allows its use with require. Of course with such
parameters to required files, you have to ensure that the first
require fits for all uses (i.e., require it early in the
master load file).
include-file i*x wfileid -- j*x unknown ``include-file''
Interpret (process using the text interpreter) the contents of the file wfileid.
included i*x c-addr u -- j*x file ``included''
include-file the file whose name is given by the string
c-addr u.
included? c-addr u -- f gforth ``included?''
True only if the file c-addr u is in the list of earlier
included files. If the file has been loaded, it may have been
specified as, say, `foo.fs' and found somewhere on the
Forth search path. To return true from included?,
you must specify the exact path to the file, even if that is
`./foo.fs'
include ... "file" -- ... gforth ``include''
include-file the file file.
required i*x addr u -- j*x gforth ``required''
include-file the file with the name given by addr
u, if it is not included (or required)
already. Currently this works by comparing the name of the file
(with path) against the names of earlier included files.
require ... "file" -- ... gforth ``require''
include-file file only if it is not included already.
needs ... "name" -- ... gforth ``needs''
An alias for require; exists on other systems (e.g., Win32Forth).
sourcefilename -- c-addr u gforth ``sourcefilename''
The name of the source file which is currently the input
source. The result is valid only while the file is being
loaded. If the current input source is no (stream) file, the
result is undefined. In Gforth, the result is valid during the
whole seesion (but not across savesystem etc.).
sourceline# -- u gforth ``sourceline-number''
The line number of the line that is currently being interpreted from a (stream) file. The first line has the number 1. If the current input source is not a (stream) file, the result is undefined.
A definition in ANS Forth for required is provided in
`compat/required.fs'.
Files are opened/created by name and type. The following file access methods (FAMs) are recognised:
r/o -- fam file ``r-o''
r/w -- fam file ``r-w''
w/o -- fam file ``w-o''
bin fam1 -- fam2 file ``bin''
When a file is opened/created, it returns a file identifier, wfileid that is used for all other file commands. All file commands also return a status value, wior, that is 0 for a successful operation and an implementation-defined non-zero value in the case of an error.
open-file c-addr u wfam -- wfileid wior file ``open-file''
create-file c-addr u wfam -- wfileid wior file ``create-file''
close-file wfileid -- wior file ``close-file''
delete-file c-addr u -- wior file ``delete-file''
rename-file c-addr1 u1 c-addr2 u2 -- wior file-ext ``rename-file''
Rename file c_addr1 u1 to new name c_addr2 u2
read-file c-addr u1 wfileid -- u2 wior file ``read-file''
read-line c_addr u1 wfileid -- u2 flag wior unknown ``read-line''
write-file c-addr u1 wfileid -- wior file ``write-file''
write-line c-addr u fileid -- ior file ``write-line''
emit-file c wfileid -- wior gforth ``emit-file''
flush-file wfileid -- wior file-ext ``flush-file''
file-status c-addr u -- wfam wior file-ext ``file-status''
file-position wfileid -- ud wior file ``file-position''
reposition-file ud wfileid -- wior file ``reposition-file''
file-size wfileid -- ud wior file ``file-size''
resize-file ud wfileid -- wior file ``resize-file''
slurp-file c-addr1 u1 -- c-addr2 u2 unknown ``slurp-file''
c-addr1 u1 is the filename, c-addr2 u2 is the file's contents
slurp-fid unknown ``slurp-fid''
stdin -- wfileid gforth ``stdin''
stdout -- wfileid gforth ``stdout''
stderr -- wfileid gforth ``stderr''
If you specify an absolute filename (i.e., a filename starting with
`/' or `~', or with `:' in the second position (as in
`C:...')) for included and friends, that file is included
just as you would expect.
If the filename starts with `./', this refers to the directory that
the present file was included from. This allows files to include
other files relative to their own position (irrespective of the current
working directory or the absolute position). This feature is essential
for libraries consisting of several files, where a file may include
other files from the library. It corresponds to #include "..."
in C. If the current input source is not a file, `.' refers to the
directory of the innermost file being included, or, if there is no file
being included, to the current working directory.
For relative filenames (not starting with `./'), Gforth uses a search path similar to Forth's search order (see section Word Lists). It tries to find the given filename in the directories present in the path, and includes the first one it finds. There are separate search paths for Forth source files and general files. If the search path contains the directory `.', this refers to the directory of the current file, or the working directory, as if the file had been specified with `./'.
Use `~+' to refer to the current working directory (as in the
bash).
The search path is initialized when you start Gforth (see section Invoking Gforth). You can display it and change it using fpath in
combination with the general path handling words.
fpath -- path-addr gforth ``fpath''
Here is an example of using fpath and require:
fpath path= /usr/lib/forth/|./ require timer.fs
Your application may need to search files in several directories, like
included does. To facilitate this, Gforth allows you to define
and use your own search paths, by providing generic equivalents of the
Forth search path words:
open-path-file addr1 u1 path-addr -- wfileid addr2 u2 0 | ior gforth ``open-path-file''
Look in path path-addr for the file specified by addr1 u1. If found, the resulting path and and (read-only) open file descriptor are returned. If the file is not found, ior is non-zero.
path-allot umax -- unknown ``path-allot''
Allot a path with umax characters capacity, initially empty.
clear-path path-addr -- gforth ``clear-path''
Set the path path-addr to empty.
also-path c-addr len path-addr -- gforth ``also-path''
add the directory c-addr len to path-addr.
.path path-addr -- gforth ``.path''
Display the contents of the search path path-addr.
path+ path-addr "dir" -- gforth ``path+''
Add the directory dir to the search path path-addr.
path= path-addr "dir1|dir2|dir3" gforth ``path=''
Make a complete new search path; the path separator is |.
Here's an example of creating an empty search path:
create mypath 500 path-allot \ maximum length 500 chars (is checked)
When you run Gforth on a modern desk-top computer, it runs under the control of an operating system which provides certain services. One of these services is file services, which allows Forth source code and data to be stored in files and read into Gforth (see section Files).
Traditionally, Forth has been an important programming language on systems where it has interfaced directly to the underlying hardware with no intervening operating system. Forth provides a mechanism, called blocks, for accessing mass storage on such systems.
A block is a 1024-byte data area, which can be used to hold data or Forth source code. No structure is imposed on the contents of the block. A block is identified by its number; blocks are numbered contiguously from 1 to an implementation-defined maximum.
A typical system that used blocks but no operating system might use a single floppy-disk drive for mass storage, with the disks formatted to provide 256-byte sectors. Blocks would be implemented by assigning the first four sectors of the disk to block 1, the second four sectors to block 2 and so on, up to the limit of the capacity of the disk. The disk would not contain any file system information, just the set of blocks.
On systems that do provide file services, blocks are typically implemented by storing a sequence of blocks within a single blocks file. The size of the blocks file will be an exact multiple of 1024 bytes, corresponding to the number of blocks it contains. This is the mechanism that Gforth uses.
Only one blocks file can be open at a time. If you use block words without having specified a blocks file, Gforth defaults to the blocks file `blocks.fb'. Gforth uses the Forth search path when attempting to locate a blocks file (see section Source Search Paths).
When you read and write blocks under program control, Gforth uses a
number of block buffers as intermediate storage. These buffers are
not used when you use load to interpret the contents of a block.
The behaviour of the block buffers is analagous to that of a cache. Each block buffer has three states:
Initially, all block buffers are unassigned. In order to access a block, the block (specified by its block number) must be assigned to a block buffer.
The assignment of a block to a block buffer is performed by block
or buffer. Use block when you wish to modify the existing
contents of a block. Use buffer when you don't care about the
existing contents of the block(30).
Once a block has been assigned to a block buffer using block or
buffer, that block buffer becomes the current block
buffer. Data may only be manipulated (read or written) within the
current block buffer.
When the contents of the current block buffer has been modified it is
necessary, before calling block or buffer again, to
either abandon the changes (by doing nothing) or mark the block as
changed (assigned-dirty), using update. Using update does
not change the blocks file; it simply changes a block buffer's state to
assigned-dirty. The block will be written implicitly when it's
buffer is needed for another block, or explicitly by flush or
save-buffers.
word Flush writes all assigned-dirty blocks back to the
blocks file on disk. Leaving Gforth with bye also performs a
flush.
In Gforth, block and buffer use a direct-mapped
algorithm to assign a block buffer to a block. That means that any
particular block can only be assigned to one specific block buffer,
called (for the particular operation) the victim buffer. If the
victim buffer is unassigned or assigned-clean it is allocated to
the new block immediately. If it is assigned-dirty its current
contents are written back to the blocks file on disk before it is
allocated to the new block.
Although no structure is imposed on the contents of a block, it is traditional to display the contents as 16 lines each of 64 characters. A block provides a single, continuous stream of input (for example, it acts as a single parse area) -- there are no end-of-line characters within a block, and no end-of-file character at the end of a block. There are two consequences of this:
\ -- comment to end of line -- requires special
treatment; in the context of a block it causes all characters until the
end of the current 64-character "line" to be ignored.
In Gforth, when you use block with a non-existent block number,
the current blocks file will be extended to the appropriate size and the
block buffer will be initialised with spaces.
Gforth includes a simple block editor (type use blocked.fb 0 list
for details) but doesn't encourage the use of blocks; the mechanism is
only provided for backward compatibility -- ANS Forth requires blocks to
be available when files are.
Common techniques that are used when working with blocks include:
thru commands which load the whole of the application.
See Frank Sergeant's Pygmy Forth to see just how well blocks can be integrated into a Forth programming environment.
open-blocks c-addr u -- gforth ``open-blocks''
Use the file, whose name is given by c-addr u, as the blocks file.
use "file" -- gforth ``use''
Use file as the blocks file.
block-offset -- addr gforth ``block-offset''
User variable containing the number of the first block (default
since 0.5.0: 0). Block files created with Gforth versions before
0.5.0 have the offset 1. If you use these files you can: 1
offset !; or add 1 to every block number used; or prepend 1024
characters to the file.
get-block-fid -- wfileid gforth ``get-block-fid''
Return the file-id of the current blocks file. If no blocks file has been opened, use `blocks.fb' as the default blocks file.
block-position u -- block ``block-position''
Position the block file to the start of block u.
list u -- block-ext ``list''
Display block u. In Gforth, the block is displayed as 16 numbered lines, each of 64 characters.
scr -- a-addr block-ext ``s-c-r''
User variable -- a-addr is the address of a cell containing
the block number of the block most recently processed by
list.
block u -- a-addr block ``block''
If a block buffer is assigned for block u, return its
start address, a-addr. Otherwise, assign a block buffer
for block u (if the assigned block buffer has been
updated, transfer the contents to mass storage), read
the block into the block buffer and return its start address,
a-addr.
buffer u -- a-addr block ``buffer''
If a block buffer is assigned for block u, return its
start address, a-addr. Otherwise, assign a block buffer
for block u (if the assigned block buffer has been
updated, transfer the contents to mass storage) and
return its start address, a-addr. The subtle difference
between buffer and block mean that you should
only use buffer if you don't care about the previous
contents of block u. In Gforth, this simply calls
block.
empty-buffers -- block-ext ``empty-buffers''
Mark all block buffers as unassigned; if any had been marked as
assigned-dirty (by update), the changes to those blocks
will be lost.
empty-buffer buffer -- gforth ``empty-buffer''
update -- block ``update''
Mark the state of the current block buffer as assigned-dirty.
updated? n -- f gforth ``updated?''
Return true if updated has been used to mark block n
as assigned-dirty.
save-buffers -- block ``save-buffers''
Transfer the contents of each updated block buffer to
mass storage, then mark all block buffers as assigned-clean.
save-buffer buffer -- gforth ``save-buffer''
flush -- block ``flush''
Perform the functions of save-buffers then
empty-buffers.
load i*x n -- j*x block ``load''
Save the current input source specification. Store n in
BLK, set >IN to 0 and interpret. When the parse
area is exhausted, restore the input source specification.
thru i*x n1 n2 -- j*x block-ext ``thru''
load the blocks n1 through n2 in sequence.
+load i*x n -- j*x gforth ``+load''
Used within a block to load the block specified as the current block + n.
+thru i*x n1 n2 -- j*x gforth ``+thru''
Used within a block to load the range of blocks specified as the current block + n1 thru the current block + n2.
--> -- gforth ``chain''
If this symbol is encountered whilst loading block n,
discard the remainder of the block and load block n+1. Used
for chaining multiple blocks together as a single loadable
unit. Not recommended, because it destroys the independence of
loading. Use thru (which is standard) or +thru
instead.
block-included a-addr u -- gforth ``block-included''
Use within a block that is to be processed by load. Save
the current blocks file specification, open the blocks file
specified by a-addr u and load block 1 from that
file (which may in turn chain or load other blocks). Finally,
close the blocks file and restore the original blocks file.
The simplest output functions are those that display numbers from the
data or floating-point stacks. Floating-point output is always displayed
using base 10. Numbers displayed from the data stack use the value stored
in base.
. n -- core ``dot''
Display (the signed single number) n in free-format, followed by a space.
dec. n -- gforth ``dec.''
Display n as a signed decimal number, followed by a space.
hex. u -- gforth ``hex.''
Display u as an unsigned hex number, prefixed with a "$" and followed by a space.
u. u -- core ``u-dot''
Display (the unsigned single number) u in free-format, followed by a space.
.r n1 n2 -- core-ext ``dot-r''
Display n1 right-aligned in a field n2 characters wide. If more than n2 characters are needed to display the number, all digits are displayed. If appropriate, n2 must include a character for a leading "-".
u.r u n -- core-ext ``u-dot-r''
Display u right-aligned in a field n characters wide. If more than n characters are needed to display the number, all digits are displayed.
d. d -- double ``d-dot''
Display (the signed double number) d in free-format. followed by a space.
ud. ud -- gforth ``u-d-dot''
Display (the signed double number) ud in free-format, followed by a space.
d.r d n -- double ``d-dot-r''
Display d right-aligned in a field n characters wide. If more than n characters are needed to display the number, all digits are displayed. If appropriate, n must include a character for a leading "-".
ud.r ud n -- gforth ``u-d-dot-r''
Display ud right-aligned in a field n characters wide. If more than n characters are needed to display the number, all digits are displayed.
f. r -- float-ext ``f-dot''
Display (the floating-point number) r without exponent, followed by a space.
fe. r -- float-ext ``f-e-dot''
Display r using engineering notation (with exponent dividable by 3), followed by a space.
fs. r -- float-ext ``f-s-dot''
Display r using scientific notation (with exponent), followed by a space.
f.rdp rf +nr +nd +np -- gforth ``f.rdp''
Print float rf formatted. The total width of the output is
nr. For fixed-point notation, the number of digits after the
decimal point is +nd and the minimum number of significant
digits is np. Set-precision has no effect on
f.rdp. Fixed-point notation is used if the number of
siginicant digits would be at least np and if the number of
digits before the decimal point would fit. If fixed-point notation
is not used, exponential notation is used, and if that does not
fit, asterisks are printed. We recommend using nr>=7 to avoid
the risk of numbers not fitting at all. We recommend
nr>=np+5 to avoid cases where f.rdp switches to
exponential notation because fixed-point notation would have too
few significant digits, yet exponential notation offers fewer
significant digits. We recommend nr>=nd+2, if you want to
have fixed-point notation for some numbers. We recommend
np>nr, if you want to have exponential notation for all
numbers.
Examples of printing the number 1234.5678E23 in the different floating-point output formats are shown below:
f. 123456779999999000000000000. fe. 123.456779999999E24 fs. 1.23456779999999E26
Forth traditionally uses a technique called pictured numeric
output for formatted printing of integers. In this technique, digits
are extracted from the number (using the current output radix defined by
base), converted to ASCII codes and appended to a string that is
built in a scratch-pad area of memory (see section Implementation Defined Options). Arbitrary characters can be appended to the string during the
extraction process. The completed string is specified by an address
and length and can be manipulated (TYPEed, copied, modified)
under program control.
All of the integer output words described in the previous section (see section Simple numeric output) are implemented in Gforth using pictured numeric output.
Three important things to remember about pictured numeric output:
<# -- core ``less-number-sign''
Initialise/clear the pictured numeric output string.
<<# -- gforth ``less-less-number-sign''
Start a hold area that ends with #>>. Can be nested in
each other and in <#. Note: if you do not match up the
<<#s with #>>s, you will eventually run out of
hold area; you can reset the hold area to empty with <#.
# ud1 -- ud2 core ``number-sign''
Used within <# and #>. Add the next
least-significant digit to the pictured numeric output
string. This is achieved by dividing ud1 by the number in
base to leave quotient ud2 and remainder n;
n is converted to the appropriate display code (eg ASCII
code) and appended to the string. If the number has been fully
converted, ud1 will be 0 and # will append a "0"
to the string.
#s ud -- 0 0 core ``number-sign-s''
Used within <# and #>. Convert all remaining digits
using the same algorithm as for #. #s will convert
at least one digit. Therefore, if ud is 0, #s will append
a "0" to the pictured numeric output string.
hold char -- core ``hold''
Used within <# and #>. Append the character
char to the pictured numeric output string.
sign n -- core ``sign''
Used within <# and #>. If n (a single
number) is negative, append the display code for a minus sign
to the pictured numeric output string. Since the string is
built up "backwards" this is usually used immediately prior
to #>, as shown in the examples below.
#> xd -- addr u core ``number-sign-greater''
Complete the pictured numeric output string by discarding xd and returning addr u; the address and length of the formatted string. A Standard program may modify characters within the string.
#>> -- gforth ``number-sign-greater-greater''
Release the hold area started with <<#.
represent r c-addr u -- n f1 f2 float ``represent''
f>str-rdp rf +nr +nd +np -- c-addr nr gforth ``f>str-rdp''
Convert rf into a string at c-addr nr. The conversion
rules and the meanings of nr +nd np are the same as for
f.rdp. The result in in the pictured numeric output buffer
and will be destroyed by anything destroying that buffer.
doc-f>buf-rdp
Here are some examples of using pictured numeric output:
: my-u. ( u -- ) \ Simplest use of pns.. behaves like Standard u. 0 \ convert to unsigned double <<# \ start conversion #s \ convert all digits #> \ complete conversion TYPE SPACE \ display, with trailing space #>> ; \ release hold area : cents-only ( u -- ) 0 \ convert to unsigned double <<# \ start conversion # # \ convert two least-significant digits #> \ complete conversion, discard other digits TYPE SPACE \ display, with trailing space #>> ; \ release hold area : dollars-and-cents ( u -- ) 0 \ convert to unsigned double <<# \ start conversion # # \ convert two least-significant digits [char] . hold \ insert decimal point #s \ convert remaining digits [char] $ hold \ append currency symbol #> \ complete conversion TYPE SPACE \ display, with trailing space #>> ; \ release hold area : my-. ( n -- ) \ handling negatives.. behaves like Standard . s>d \ convert to signed double swap over dabs \ leave sign byte followed by unsigned double <<# \ start conversion #s \ convert all digits rot sign \ get at sign byte, append "-" if needed #> \ complete conversion TYPE SPACE \ display, with trailing space #>> ; \ release hold area : account. ( n -- ) \ accountants don't like minus signs, they use parentheses \ for negative numbers s>d \ convert to signed double swap over dabs \ leave sign byte followed by unsigned double <<# \ start conversion 2 pick \ get copy of sign byte 0< IF [char] ) hold THEN \ right-most character of output #s \ convert all digits rot \ get at sign byte 0< IF [char] ( hold THEN #> \ complete conversion TYPE SPACE \ display, with trailing space #>> ; \ release hold area
Here are some examples of using these words:
1 my-u. 1 hex -1 my-u. decimal FFFFFFFF 1 cents-only 01 1234 cents-only 34 2 dollars-and-cents $0.02 1234 dollars-and-cents $12.34 123 my-. 123 -123 my. -123 123 account. 123 -456 account. (456)
Forth commonly uses two different methods for representing character strings:
ANS Forth encourages the use of the second format when representing strings.
count c-addr1 -- c-addr2 u core ``count''
c-addr2 is the first character and u the length of the counted string at c-addr1.
For words that move, copy and search for strings see section Memory Blocks. For words that display characters and strings see section Displaying characters and strings.
This section starts with a glossary of Forth words and ends with a set of examples.
bl -- c-char core ``b-l''
c-char is the character value for a space.
space -- core ``space''
Display one space.
spaces u -- core ``spaces''
Display n spaces.
emit c -- core ``emit''
Display the character associated with character value c.
toupper c1 -- c2 gforth ``toupper''
If c1 is a lower-case character (in the current locale), c2 is the equivalent upper-case character. All other characters are unchanged.
." compilation 'ccc"' -- ; run-time -- core ``dot-quote''
Compilation: Parse a string ccc delimited by a " (double quote). At run-time, display the string. Interpretation semantics for this word are undefined in ANS Forth. Gforth's interpretation semantics are to display the string. This is the simplest way to display a string from within a definition; see examples below.
.( compilation&interpretation "ccc<paren>" -- core-ext ``dot-paren''
Compilation and interpretation semantics: Parse a string ccc
delimited by a ) (right parenthesis). Display the
string. This is often used to display progress information during
compilation; see examples below.
.\" compilation 'ccc"' -- ; run-time -- gforth ``dot-backslash-quote''
type c-addr u -- core ``type''
If u>0, display u characters from a string starting with the character stored at c-addr.
typewhite addr n -- gforth ``typewhite''
Like type, but white space is printed instead of the characters.
cr -- core ``c-r''
Output a newline (of the favourite kind of the host OS). Note
that due to the way the Forth command line interpreter inserts
newlines, the preferred way to use cr is at the start
of a piece of text; e.g., cr ." hello, world".
at-xy u1 u2 -- facility ``at-x-y''
Position the cursor so that subsequent text output will take place at column u1, row u2 of the display. (column 0, row 0 is the top left-hand corner of the display).
page -- facility ``page''
Clear the display and set the cursor to the top left-hand corner.
S" compilation 'ccc"' -- ; run-time -- c-addr u core,file ``s-quote''
Compilation: Parse a string ccc delimited by a "
(double quote). At run-time, return the length, u, and the
start address, c-addr of the string. Interpretation: parse
the string as before, and return c-addr, u. Gforth
allocates the string. The resulting memory leak is usually
not a problem; the exception is if you create strings containing
S" and evaluate them; then the leak is not bounded
by the size of the interpreted files and you may want to
free the strings. ANS Forth only guarantees one buffer of
80 characters, so in standard programs you should assume that the
string lives only until the next s".
s\" compilation 'ccc"' -- ; run-time -- c-addr u gforth ``s-backslash-quote''
Like S", but translates C-like \-escape-sequences into
single characters. See \"-parse for details.
C" compilation "ccc<quote>" -- ; run-time -- c-addr core-ext ``c-quote''
Compilation: parse a string ccc delimited by a "
(double quote). At run-time, return c-addr which
specifies the counted string ccc. Interpretation
semantics are undefined.
char '<spaces>ccc' -- c core ``char''
Skip leading spaces. Parse the string ccc and return c, the display code representing the first character of ccc.
[Char] compilation '<spaces>ccc' -- ; run-time -- c core ``bracket-char''
Compilation: skip leading spaces. Parse the string ccc. Run-time: return c, the display code representing the first character of ccc. Interpretation semantics for this word are undefined.
As an example, consider the following text, stored in a file `test.fs':
.( text-1) : my-word ." text-2" cr .( text-3) ; ." text-4" : my-char [char] ALPHABET emit char emit ;
When you load this code into Gforth, the following output is generated:
include test.fs RET text-1text-3text-4 ok
text-1 and text-3 are displayed because .(
is an immediate word; it behaves in the same way whether it is used inside
or outside a colon definition.
text-4 is displayed because of Gforth's added interpretation
semantics for .".
text-2 is not displayed, because the text interpreter
performs the compilation semantics for ." within the definition of
my-word.
Here are some examples of executing my-word and my-char:
my-word RET text-2 ok my-char fred RET Af ok my-char jim RET Aj ok
text-2 is displayed because of the run-time behaviour of
.".
[char] compiles the "A" from "ALPHABET" and puts its display code
on the stack at run-time. emit always displays the character
when my-char is executed.
char parses a string at run-time and the second emit displays
the first character of the string.
see my-char you can see that [char] discarded
the text "LPHABET" and only compiled the display code for "A" into the
definition of my-char.
For ways of storing character strings in memory see section String Formats.
key -- char core ``key''
Receive (but do not display) one character, char.
key? -- flag facility ``key-question''
Determine whether a character is available. If a character is
available, flag is true; the next call to key will
yield the character. Once key? returns true, subsequent
calls to key? before calling key or ekey will
also return true.
ekey -- u facility-ext ``e-key''
ekey? -- flag unknown ``ekey?''
ekey>char u -- u false | c true facility-ext ``e-key-to-char''
>number ud1 c-addr1 u1 -- ud2 c-addr2 u2 core ``to-number''
Attempt to convert the character string c-addr1 u1 to an
unsigned number in the current number base. The double
ud1 accumulates the result of the conversion to form
ud2. Conversion continues, left-to-right, until the whole
string is converted or a character that is not convertable in
the current number base is encountered (including + or -). For
each convertable character, ud1 is first multiplied by
the value in BASE and then incremented by the value
represented by the character. c-addr2 is the location of
the first unconverted character (past the end of the string if
the whole string was converted). u2 is the number of
unconverted characters in the string. Overflow is not detected.
>float c-addr u -- flag float ``to-float''
Actual stack effect: ( c_addr u -- r t | f ). Attempt to convert the character string c-addr u to internal floating-point representation. If the string represents a valid floating-point number r is placed on the floating-point stack and flag is true. Otherwise, flag is false. A string of blanks is a special case and represents the floating-point number 0.
accept c-addr +n1 -- +n2 core ``accept''
Get a string of up to n1 characters from the user input
device and store it at c-addr. n2 is the length of
the received string. The user indicates the end by pressing
RET. Gforth supports all the editing functions available
on the Forth command line (including history and word
completion) in accept.
edit-line c-addr n1 n2 -- n3 gforth ``edit-line''
edit the string with length n2 in the buffer c-addr
n1, like accept.
pad -- c-addr core-ext ``pad''
c-addr is the address of a transient region that can be used as temporary data storage. At least 84 characters of space is available.
convert ud1 c-addr1 -- ud2 c-addr2 core-ext ``convert''
OBSOLESCENT: superseded by >number.
expect c-addr +n -- core-ext ``expect''
Receive a string of at most +n characters, and store it
in memory starting at c-addr. The string is
displayed. Input terminates when the <return> key is pressed or
+n characters have been received. The normal Gforth line
editing capabilites are available. The length of the string is
stored in span; it does not include the <return>
character. OBSOLESCENT: superceeded by accept.
span -- c-addr core-ext ``span''
Variable -- c-addr is the address of a cell that stores the
length of the last string received by expect. OBSOLESCENT.
In addition to using Gforth in pipes created by other processes
(see section Gforth in pipes), you can create your own pipe with
open-pipe, and read from or write to it.
open-pipe c-addr u wfam -- wfileid wior gforth ``open-pipe''
close-pipe wfileid -- wretval wior gforth ``close-pipe''
If you write to a pipe, Gforth can throw a broken-pipe-error; if
you don't catch this exception, Gforth will catch it and exit, usually
silently (see section Gforth in pipes). Since you probably do not want
this, you should wrap a catch or try block around the code
from open-pipe to close-pipe, so you can deal with the
problem yourself, and then return to regular processing.
broken-pipe-error -- n gforth ``broken-pipe-error''
the error number for a broken pipe
Local variables can make Forth programming more enjoyable and Forth programs easier to read. Unfortunately, the locals of ANS Forth are laden with restrictions. Therefore, we provide not only the ANS Forth locals wordset, but also our own, more powerful locals wordset (we implemented the ANS Forth locals wordset through our locals wordset).
The ideas in this section have also been published in M. Anton Ertl, Automatic Scoping of Local Variables, EuroForth '94.
Locals can be defined with
{ local1 local2 ... -- comment }
or
{ local1 local2 ... }
E.g.,
: max { n1 n2 -- n3 }
n1 n2 > if
n1
else
n2
endif ;
The similarity of locals definitions with stack comments is intended. A
locals definition often replaces the stack comment of a word. The order
of the locals corresponds to the order in a stack comment and everything
after the -- is really a comment.
This similarity has one disadvantage: It is too easy to confuse locals declarations with stack comments, causing bugs and making them hard to find. However, this problem can be avoided by appropriate coding conventions: Do not use both notations in the same program. If you do, they should be distinguished using additional means, e.g. by position.
The name of the local may be preceded by a type specifier, e.g.,
F: for a floating point value:
: CX* { F: Ar F: Ai F: Br F: Bi -- Cr Ci }
\ complex multiplication
Ar Br f* Ai Bi f* f-
Ar Bi f* Ai Br f* f+ ;
Gforth currently supports cells (W:, W^), doubles
(D:, D^), floats (F:, F^) and characters
(C:, C^) in two flavours: a value-flavoured local (defined
with W:, D: etc.) produces its value and can be changed
with TO. A variable-flavoured local (defined with W^ etc.)
produces its address (which becomes invalid when the variable's scope is
left). E.g., the standard word emit can be defined in terms of
type like this:
: emit { C^ char* -- }
char* 1 type ;
A local without type specifier is a W: local. Both flavours of
locals are initialized with values from the data or FP stack.
Currently there is no way to define locals with user-defined data structures, but we are working on it.
Gforth allows defining locals everywhere in a colon definition. This poses the following questions:
Basically, the answer is that locals are visible where you would expect
it in block-structured languages, and sometimes a little longer. If you
want to restrict the scope of a local, enclose its definition in
SCOPE...ENDSCOPE.
scope compilation -- scope ; run-time -- gforth ``scope''
endscope compilation scope -- ; run-time -- gforth ``endscope''
These words behave like control structure words, so you can use them
with CS-PICK and CS-ROLL to restrict the scope in
arbitrary ways.
If you want a more exact answer to the visibility question, here's the
basic principle: A local is visible in all places that can only be
reached through the definition of the local(31). In other words, it is not visible in places that can be reached
without going through the definition of the local. E.g., locals defined
in IF...ENDIF are visible until the ENDIF, locals
defined in BEGIN...UNTIL are visible after the
UNTIL (until, e.g., a subsequent ENDSCOPE).
The reasoning behind this solution is: We want to have the locals visible as long as it is meaningful. The user can always make the visibility shorter by using explicit scoping. In a place that can only be reached through the definition of a local, the meaning of a local name is clear. In other places it is not: How is the local initialized at the control flow path that does not contain the definition? Which local is meant, if the same name is defined twice in two independent control flow paths?
This should be enough detail for nearly all users, so you can skip the rest of this section. If you really must know all the gory details and options, read on.
In order to implement this rule, the compiler has to know which places
are unreachable. It knows this automatically after AHEAD,
AGAIN, EXIT and LEAVE; in other cases (e.g., after
most THROWs), you can use the word UNREACHABLE to tell the
compiler that the control flow never reaches that place. If
UNREACHABLE is not used where it could, the only consequence is
that the visibility of some locals is more limited than the rule above
says. If UNREACHABLE is used where it should not (i.e., if you
lie to the compiler), buggy code will be produced.
UNREACHABLE -- gforth ``UNREACHABLE''
Another problem with this rule is that at BEGIN, the compiler
does not know which locals will be visible on the incoming
back-edge. All problems discussed in the following are due to this
ignorance of the compiler (we discuss the problems using BEGIN
loops as examples; the discussion also applies to ?DO and other
loops). Perhaps the most insidious example is:
AHEAD
BEGIN
x
[ 1 CS-ROLL ] THEN
{ x }
...
UNTIL
This should be legal according to the visibility rule. The use of
x can only be reached through the definition; but that appears
textually below the use.
From this example it is clear that the visibility rules cannot be fully
implemented without major headaches. Our implementation treats common
cases as advertised and the exceptions are treated in a safe way: The
compiler makes a reasonable guess about the locals visible after a
BEGIN; if it is too pessimistic, the
user will get a spurious error about the local not being defined; if the
compiler is too optimistic, it will notice this later and issue a
warning. In the case above the compiler would complain about x
being undefined at its use. You can see from the obscure examples in
this section that it takes quite unusual control structures to get the
compiler into trouble, and even then it will often do fine.
If the BEGIN is reachable from above, the most optimistic guess
is that all locals visible before the BEGIN will also be
visible after the BEGIN. This guess is valid for all loops that
are entered only through the BEGIN, in particular, for normal
BEGIN...WHILE...REPEAT and
BEGIN...UNTIL loops and it is implemented in our
compiler. When the branch to the BEGIN is finally generated by
AGAIN or UNTIL, the compiler checks the guess and
warns the user if it was too optimistic:
IF
{ x }
BEGIN
\ x ?
[ 1 cs-roll ] THEN
...
UNTIL
Here, x lives only until the BEGIN, but the compiler
optimistically assumes that it lives until the THEN. It notices
this difference when it compiles the UNTIL and issues a
warning. The user can avoid the warning, and make sure that x
is not used in the wrong area by using explicit scoping:
IF
SCOPE
{ x }
ENDSCOPE
BEGIN
[ 1 cs-roll ] THEN
...
UNTIL
Since the guess is optimistic, there will be no spurious error messages about undefined locals.
If the BEGIN is not reachable from above (e.g., after
AHEAD or EXIT), the compiler cannot even make an
optimistic guess, as the locals visible after the BEGIN may be
defined later. Therefore, the compiler assumes that no locals are
visible after the BEGIN. However, the user can use
ASSUME-LIVE to make the compiler assume that the same locals are
visible at the BEGIN as at the point where the top control-flow stack
item was created.
ASSUME-LIVE orig -- orig gforth ``ASSUME-LIVE''
E.g.,
{ x }
AHEAD
ASSUME-LIVE
BEGIN
x
[ 1 CS-ROLL ] THEN
...
UNTIL
Other cases where the locals are defined before the BEGIN can be
handled by inserting an appropriate CS-ROLL before the
ASSUME-LIVE (and changing the control-flow stack manipulation
behind the ASSUME-LIVE).
Cases where locals are defined after the BEGIN (but should be
visible immediately after the BEGIN) can only be handled by
rearranging the loop. E.g., the "most insidious" example above can be
arranged into:
BEGIN
{ x }
... 0=
WHILE
x
REPEAT
The right answer for the lifetime question would be: A local lives at least as long as it can be accessed. For a value-flavoured local this means: until the end of its visibility. However, a variable-flavoured local could be accessed through its address far beyond its visibility scope. Ultimately, this would mean that such locals would have to be garbage collected. Since this entails un-Forth-like implementation complexities, I adopted the same cowardly solution as some other languages (e.g., C): The local lives only as long as it is visible; afterwards its address is invalid (and programs that access it afterwards are erroneous).
The freedom to define locals anywhere has the potential to change
programming styles dramatically. In particular, the need to use the
return stack for intermediate storage vanishes. Moreover, all stack
manipulations (except PICKs and ROLLs with run-time
determined arguments) can be eliminated: If the stack items are in the
wrong order, just write a locals definition for all of them; then
write the items in the order you want.
This seems a little far-fetched and eliminating stack manipulations is
unlikely to become a conscious programming objective. Still, the number
of stack manipulations will be reduced dramatically if local variables
are used liberally (e.g., compare max (see section Gforth locals) with
a traditional implementation of max).
This shows one potential benefit of locals: making Forth programs more readable. Of course, this benefit will only be realized if the programmers continue to honour the principle of factoring instead of using the added latitude to make the words longer.
Using TO can and should be avoided. Without TO,
every value-flavoured local has only a single assignment and many
advantages of functional languages apply to Forth. I.e., programs are
easier to analyse, to optimize and to read: It is clear from the
definition what the local stands for, it does not turn into something
different later.
E.g., a definition using TO might look like this:
: strcmp { addr1 u1 addr2 u2 -- n }
u1 u2 min 0
?do
addr1 c@ addr2 c@ -
?dup-if
unloop exit
then
addr1 char+ TO addr1
addr2 char+ TO addr2
loop
u1 u2 - ;
Here, TO is used to update addr1 and addr2 at
every loop iteration. strcmp is a typical example of the
readability problems of using TO. When you start reading
strcmp, you think that addr1 refers to the start of the
string. Only near the end of the loop you realize that it is something
else.
This can be avoided by defining two locals at the start of the loop that are initialized with the right value for the current iteration.
: strcmp { addr1 u1 addr2 u2 -- n }
addr1 addr2
u1 u2 min 0
?do { s1 s2 }
s1 c@ s2 c@ -
?dup-if
unloop exit
then
s1 char+ s2 char+
loop
2drop
u1 u2 - ;
Here it is clear from the start that s1 has a different value
in every loop iteration.
Gforth uses an extra locals stack. The most compelling reason for this is that the return stack is not float-aligned; using an extra stack also eliminates the problems and restrictions of using the return stack as locals stack. Like the other stacks, the locals stack grows toward lower addresses. A few primitives allow an efficient implementation:
@local# #noffset -- w gforth ``fetch-local-number''
f@local# #noffset -- r gforth ``f-fetch-local-number''
laddr# #noffset -- c-addr gforth ``laddr-number''
lp+!# #noffset -- gforth ``lp-plus-store-number''
used with negative immediate values it allocates memory on the local stack, a positive immediate argument drops memory from the local stack
lp! c-addr -- gforth ``lp-store''
>l w -- gforth ``to-l''
f>l r -- gforth ``f-to-l''
In addition to these primitives, some specializations of these
primitives for commonly occurring inline arguments are provided for
efficiency reasons, e.g., @local0 as specialization of
@local# for the inline argument 0. The following compiling words
compile the right specialized version, or the general version, as
appropriate:
compile-lp+! n -- gforth ``compile-l-p-plus-store''
Combinations of conditional branches and lp+!# like
?branch-lp+!# (the locals pointer is only changed if the branch
is taken) are provided for efficiency and correctness in loops.
A special area in the dictionary space is reserved for keeping the
local variable names. { switches the dictionary pointer to this
area and } switches it back and generates the locals
initializing code. W: etc. are normal defining words. This
special area is cleared at the start of every colon definition.
A special feature of Gforth's dictionary is used to implement the
definition of locals without type specifiers: every word list (aka
vocabulary) has its own methods for searching
etc. (see section Word Lists). For the present purpose we defined a word list
with a special search method: When it is searched for a word, it
actually creates that word using W:. { changes the search
order to first search the word list containing }, W: etc.,
and then the word list for defining locals without type specifiers.
The lifetime rules support a stack discipline within a colon definition: The lifetime of a local is either nested with other locals lifetimes or it does not overlap them.
At BEGIN, IF, and AHEAD no code for locals stack
pointer manipulation is generated. Between control structure words
locals definitions can push locals onto the locals stack. AGAIN
is the simplest of the other three control flow words. It has to
restore the locals stack depth of the corresponding BEGIN
before branching. The code looks like this:
lp+!#current-locals-size - dest-locals-sizebranch<begin>
UNTIL is a little more complicated: If it branches back, it
must adjust the stack just like AGAIN. But if it falls through,
the locals stack must not be changed. The compiler generates the
following code:
?branch-lp+!# <begin> current-locals-size - dest-locals-size
The locals stack pointer is only adjusted if the branch is taken.
THEN can produce somewhat inefficient code:
lp+!#current-locals-size - orig-locals-size <orig target>:lp+!#orig-locals-size - new-locals-size
The second lp+!# adjusts the locals stack pointer from the
level at the orig point to the level after the THEN. The
first lp+!# adjusts the locals stack pointer from the current
level to the level at the orig point, so the complete effect is an
adjustment from the current level to the right level after the
THEN.
In a conventional Forth implementation a dest control-flow stack entry is just the target address and an orig entry is just the address to be patched. Our locals implementation adds a word list to every orig or dest item. It is the list of locals visible (or assumed visible) at the point described by the entry. Our implementation also adds a tag to identify the kind of entry, in particular to differentiate between live and dead (reachable and unreachable) orig entries.
A few unusual operations have to be performed on locals word lists:
common-list list1 list2 -- list3 gforth-internal ``common-list''
sub-list? list1 list2 -- f gforth-internal ``sub-list?''
list-size list -- u gforth-internal ``list-size''
Several features of our locals word list implementation make these operations easy to implement: The locals word lists are organised as linked lists; the tails of these lists are shared, if the lists contain some of the same locals; and the address of a name is greater than the address of the names behind it in the list.
Another important implementation detail is the variable
dead-code. It is used by BEGIN and THEN to
determine if they can be reached directly or only through the branch
that they resolve. dead-code is set by UNREACHABLE,
AHEAD, EXIT etc., and cleared at the start of a colon
definition, by BEGIN and usually by THEN.
Counted loops are similar to other loops in most respects, but
LEAVE requires special attention: It performs basically the same
service as AHEAD, but it does not create a control-flow stack
entry. Therefore the information has to be stored elsewhere;
traditionally, the information was stored in the target fields of the
branches created by the LEAVEs, by organizing these fields into a
linked list. Unfortunately, this clever trick does not provide enough
space for storing our extended control flow information. Therefore, we
introduce another stack, the leave stack. It contains the control-flow
stack entries for all unresolved LEAVEs.
Local names are kept until the end of the colon definition, even if they are no longer visible in any control-flow path. In a few cases this may lead to increased space needs for the locals name area, but usually less than reclaiming this space would cost in code size.
The ANS Forth locals wordset does not define a syntax for locals, but words that make it possible to define various syntaxes. One of the possible syntaxes is a subset of the syntax we used in the Gforth locals wordset, i.e.:
{ local1 local2 ... -- comment }
or
{ local1 local2 ... }
The order of the locals corresponds to the order in a stack comment. The restrictions are:
Locals defined in ANS Forth behave like VALUEs
(see section Values). I.e., they are initialized from the stack. Using their
name produces their value. Their value can be changed using TO.
Since the syntax above is supported by Gforth directly, you need not do anything to use it. If you want to port a program using this syntax to another ANS Forth system, use `compat/anslocal.fs' to implement the syntax on the other system.
Note that a syntax shown in the standard, section A.13 looks similar, but is quite different in having the order of locals reversed. Beware!
The ANS Forth locals wordset itself consists of one word:
(local) addr u -- local ``paren-local-paren''
The ANS Forth locals extension wordset defines a syntax using
locals|, but it is so awful that we strongly recommend not to use
it. We have implemented this syntax to make porting to Gforth easy, but
do not document it here. The problem with this syntax is that the locals
are defined in an order reversed with respect to the standard stack
comment notation, making programs harder to read, and easier to misread
and miswrite. The only merit of this syntax is that it is easy to
implement using the ANS Forth locals wordset.
This section presents the structure package that comes with Gforth. A version of the package implemented in ANS Forth is available in `compat/struct.fs'. This package was inspired by a posting on comp.lang.forth in 1989 (unfortunately I don't remember, by whom; possibly John Hayes). A version of this section has been published in M. Anton Ertl, Yet Another Forth Structures Package, Forth Dimensions 19(3), pages 13--16. Marcel Hendrix provided helpful comments.
If we want to use a structure containing several fields, we could simply reserve memory for it, and access the fields using address arithmetic (see section Address arithmetic). As an example, consider a structure with the following fields
a
b
c
Given the (float-aligned) base address of the structure we get the address of the field
a
b
float+
c
float+ cell+ faligned
It is easy to see that this can become quite tiring.
Moreover, it is not very readable, because seeing a
cell+ tells us neither which kind of structure is
accessed nor what field is accessed; we have to somehow infer the kind
of structure, and then look up in the documentation, which field of
that structure corresponds to that offset.
Finally, this kind of address arithmetic also causes maintenance troubles: If you add or delete a field somewhere in the middle of the structure, you have to find and change all computations for the fields afterwards.
So, instead of using cell+ and friends directly, how
about storing the offsets in constants:
0 constant a-offset 0 float+ constant b-offset 0 float+ cell+ faligned c-offset
Now we can get the address of field x with x-offset
+. This is much better in all respects. Of course, you still
have to change all later offset definitions if you add a field. You can
fix this by declaring the offsets in the following way:
0 constant a-offset a-offset float+ constant b-offset b-offset cell+ faligned constant c-offset
Since we always use the offsets with +, we could use a defining
word cfield that includes the + in the action of the
defined word:
: cfield ( n "name" -- )
create ,
does> ( name execution: addr1 -- addr2 )
@ + ;
0 cfield a
0 a float+ cfield b
0 b cell+ faligned cfield c
Instead of x-offset +, we now simply write x.
The structure field words now can be used quite nicely. However, their definition is still a bit cumbersome: We have to repeat the name, the information about size and alignment is distributed before and after the field definitions etc. The structure package presented here addresses these problems.
You can define a structure for a (data-less) linked list with:
struct
cell% field list-next
end-struct list%
With the address of the list node on the stack, you can compute the
address of the field that contains the address of the next node with
list-next. E.g., you can determine the length of a list
with:
: list-length ( list -- n )
\ "list" is a pointer to the first element of a linked list
\ "n" is the length of the list
0 BEGIN ( list1 n1 )
over
WHILE ( list1 n1 )
1+ swap list-next @ swap
REPEAT
nip ;
You can reserve memory for a list node in the dictionary with
list% %allot, which leaves the address of the list node on the
stack. For the equivalent allocation on the heap you can use list%
%alloc (or, for an allocate-like stack effect (i.e., with ior),
use list% %allocate). You can get the the size of a list
node with list% %size and its alignment with list%
%alignment.
Note that in ANS Forth the body of a created word is
aligned but not necessarily faligned;
therefore, if you do a:
create name foo% %allot drop
then the memory alloted for foo% is guaranteed to start at the
body of name only if foo% contains only character,
cell and double fields. Therefore, if your structure contains floats,
better use
foo% %allot constant name
You can include a structure foo% as a field of
another structure, like this:
struct
...
foo% field ...
...
end-struct ...
Instead of starting with an empty structure, you can extend an existing structure. E.g., a plain linked list without data, as defined above, is hardly useful; You can extend it to a linked list of integers, like this:(32)
list%
cell% field intlist-int
end-struct intlist%
intlist% is a structure with two fields:
list-next and intlist-int.
You can specify an array type containing n elements of
type foo% like this:
foo% n *
You can use this array type in any place where you can use a normal
type, e.g., when defining a field, or with
%allot.
The first field is at the base address of a structure and the word for
this field (e.g., list-next) actually does not change the address
on the stack. You may be tempted to leave it away in the interest of
run-time and space efficiency. This is not necessary, because the
structure package optimizes this case: If you compile a first-field
words, no code is generated. So, in the interest of readability and
maintainability you should include the word for the field when accessing
the field.
The field names that come to (my) mind are often quite generic, and,
if used, would cause frequent name clashes. E.g., many structures
probably contain a counter field. The structure names
that come to (my) mind are often also the logical choice for the names
of words that create such a structure.
Therefore, I have adopted the following naming conventions:
struct-field, where
struct is the basic name of the structure, and
field is the basic name of the field. You can
think of field words as converting the (address of the)
structure into the (address of the) field.
struct%, where
struct is the basic name of the structure.
This naming convention does not work that well for fields of extended
structures; e.g., the integer list structure has a field
intlist-int, but has list-next, not
intlist-next.
The central idea in the implementation is to pass the data about the structure being built on the stack, not in some global variable. Everything else falls into place naturally once this design decision is made.
The type description on the stack is of the form align size. Keeping the size on the top-of-stack makes dealing with arrays very simple.
field is a defining word that uses Create
and DOES>. The body of the field contains the offset
of the field, and the normal DOES> action is simply:
@ +
i.e., add the offset to the address, giving the stack effect addr1 -- addr2 for a field.
This simple structure is slightly complicated by the optimization
for fields with offset 0, which requires a different
DOES>-part (because we cannot rely on there being
something on the stack if such a field is invoked during
compilation). Therefore, we put the different DOES>-parts
in separate words, and decide which one to invoke based on the
offset. For a zero offset, the field is basically a noop; it is
immediate, and therefore no code is generated when it is compiled.
%align align size -- gforth ``%align''
Align the data space pointer to the alignment align.
%alignment align size -- align gforth ``%alignment''
The alignment of the structure.
%alloc size align -- addr gforth ``%alloc''
Allocate size address units with alignment align,
giving a data block at addr; throw an ior code
if not successful.
%allocate align size -- addr ior gforth ``%allocate''
Allocate size address units with alignment align,
similar to allocate.
%allot align size -- addr gforth ``%allot''
Allot size address units of data space with alignment align; the resulting block of data is found at addr.
cell% -- align size gforth ``cell%''
char% -- align size gforth ``char%''
dfloat% -- align size gforth ``dfloat%''
double% -- align size gforth ``double%''
end-struct align size "name" -- gforth ``end-struct''
Define a structure/type descriptor name with alignment
align and size size1 (size rounded up to be a
multiple of align).
name execution: -- align size1
field align1 offset1 align size "name" -- align2 offset2 gforth ``field''
Create a field name with offset offset1, and the type
given by align size. offset2 is the offset of the
next field, and align2 is the alignment of all fields.
name execution: addr1 -- addr2.
addr2=addr1+offset1
float% -- align size gforth ``float%''
naligned addr1 n -- addr2 gforth ``naligned''
addr2 is the aligned version of addr1 with respect to the alignment n.
sfloat% -- align size gforth ``sfloat%''
%size align size -- size gforth ``%size''
The size of the structure.
struct -- align size gforth ``struct''
An empty structure, used to start a structure definition.
Gforth comes with three packages for object-oriented programming:
`objects.fs', `oof.fs', and `mini-oof.fs'; none of them
is preloaded, so you have to include them before use. The most
important differences between these packages (and others) are discussed
in section Comparison with other object models. All packages are written
in ANS Forth and can be used with any other ANS Forth.
Often we have to deal with several data structures (objects),
that have to be treated similarly in some respects, but differently in
others. Graphical objects are the textbook example: circles, triangles,
dinosaurs, icons, and others, and we may want to add more during program
development. We want to apply some operations to any graphical object,
e.g., draw for displaying it on the screen. However, draw
has to do something different for every kind of object.
We could implement draw as a big CASE
control structure that executes the appropriate code depending on the
kind of object to be drawn. This would be not be very elegant, and,
moreover, we would have to change draw every time we add
a new kind of graphical object (say, a spaceship).
What we would rather do is: When defining spaceships, we would tell
the system: "Here's how you draw a spaceship; you figure
out the rest".
This is the problem that all systems solve that (rightfully) call themselves object-oriented; the object-oriented packages presented here solve this problem (and not much else).
This section is mainly for reference, so you don't have to understand all of it right away. The terminology is mainly Smalltalk-inspired. In short:
draw) that performs an operation on a variety of data
structures (classes). A selector describes what operation to
perform. In C++ terminology: a (pure) virtual function.
This section describes the `objects.fs' package. This material also has been published in M. Anton Ertl, Yet Another Forth Objects Package, Forth Dimensions 19(2), pages 37--43.
This section assumes that you have read section Structures.
The techniques on which this model is based have been used to implement the parser generator, Gray, and have also been used in Gforth for implementing the various flavours of word lists (hashed or not, case-sensitive or not, special-purpose word lists for locals etc.).
Marcel Hendrix provided helpful comments on this section.
constant. Likewise, there is no difference between instance
variables that contain objects and those that contain other data.
:noname); however, such
words are not as bad as many other parsing words, because they are not
state-smart.
You can define a class for graphical objects like this:
object class \ "object" is the parent class selector draw ( x y graphical -- ) end-class graphical
This code defines a class graphical with an
operation draw. We can perform the operation
draw on any graphical object, e.g.:
100 100 t-rex draw
where t-rex is a word (say, a constant) that produces a
graphical object.
How do we create a graphical object? With the present definitions,
we cannot create a useful graphical object. The class
graphical describes graphical objects in general, but not
any concrete graphical object type (C++ users would call it an
abstract class); e.g., there is no method for the selector
draw in the class graphical.
For concrete graphical objects, we define child classes of the
class graphical, e.g.:
graphical class \ "graphical" is the parent class cell% field circle-radius :noname ( x y circle -- ) circle-radius @ draw-circle ; overrides draw :noname ( n-radius circle -- ) circle-radius ! ; overrides construct end-class circle
Here we define a class circle as a child of graphical,
with field circle-radius (which behaves just like a field
(see section Structures); it defines (using overrides) new methods
for the selectors draw and construct (construct is
defined in object, the parent class of graphical).
Now we can create a circle on the heap (i.e.,
allocated memory) with:
50 circle heap-new constant my-circle
heap-new invokes construct, thus
initializing the field circle-radius with 50. We can draw
this new circle at (100,100) with:
100 100 my-circle draw
Note: You can only invoke a selector if the object on the TOS
(the receiving object) belongs to the class where the selector was
defined or one of its descendents; e.g., you can invoke
draw only for objects belonging to graphical
or its descendents (e.g., circle). Immediately before
end-class, the search order has to be the same as
immediately after class.
When you define a class, you have to specify a parent class. So how do
you start defining classes? There is one class available from the start:
object. It is ancestor for all classes and so is the
only class that has no parent. It has two selectors: construct
and print.
You can create and initialize an object of a class on the heap with
heap-new ( ... class -- object ) and in the dictionary
(allocation with allot) with dict-new (
... class -- object ). Both words invoke construct, which
consumes the stack items indicated by "..." above.
If you want to allocate memory for an object yourself, you can get its
alignment and size with class-inst-size 2@ ( class --
align size ). Once you have memory for an object, you can initialize
it with init-object ( ... class object -- );
construct does only a part of the necessary work.
This section is not exhaustive.
In general, it is a good idea to ensure that all methods for the same selector have the same stack effect: when you invoke a selector, you often have no idea which method will be invoked, so, unless all methods have the same stack effect, you will not know the stack effect of the selector invocation.
One exception to this rule is methods for the selector
construct. We know which method is invoked, because we
specify the class to be constructed at the same place. Actually, I
defined construct as a selector only to give the users a
convenient way to specify initialization. The way it is used, a
mechanism different from selector invocation would be more natural
(but probably would take more code and more space to explain).
Normal selector invocations determine the method at run-time depending on the class of the receiving object. This run-time selection is called late binding.
Sometimes it's preferable to invoke a different method. For example,
you might want to use the simple method for printing
objects instead of the possibly long-winded print method
of the receiver class. You can achieve this by replacing the invocation
of print with:
[bind] object print
in compiled code or:
bind object print
in interpreted code. Alternatively, you can define the method with a
name (e.g., print-object), and then invoke it through the
name. Class binding is just a (often more convenient) way to achieve
the same effect; it avoids name clutter and allows you to invoke
methods directly without naming them first.
A frequent use of class binding is this: When we define a method
for a selector, we often want the method to do what the selector does
in the parent class, and a little more. There is a special word for
this purpose: [parent]; [parent]
selector is equivalent to [bind] parent
selector, where parent is the parent
class of the current class. E.g., a method definition might look like:
:noname dup [parent] foo \ do parent's foo on the receiving object ... \ do some more ; overrides foo
In Object-oriented programming in ANS Forth (Forth Dimensions, March 1997), Andrew McKewan presents class binding as an optimization technique. I recommend not using it for this purpose unless you are in an emergency. Late binding is pretty fast with this model anyway, so the benefit of using class binding is small; the cost of using class binding where it is not appropriate is reduced maintainability.
While we are at programming style questions: You should bind
selectors only to ancestor classes of the receiving object. E.g., say,
you know that the receiving object is of class foo or its
descendents; then you should bind only to foo and its
ancestors.
In a method you usually access the receiving object pretty often. If
you define the method as a plain colon definition (e.g., with
:noname), you may have to do a lot of stack
gymnastics. To avoid this, you can define the method with m:
... ;m. E.g., you could define the method for
drawing a circle with
m: ( x y circle -- ) ( x y ) this circle-radius @ draw-circle ;m
When this method is executed, the receiver object is removed from the
stack; you can access it with this (admittedly, in this
example the use of m: ... ;m offers no advantage). Note
that I specify the stack effect for the whole method (i.e. including
the receiver object), not just for the code between m:
and ;m. You cannot use exit in
m:...;m; instead, use
exitm.(33)
You will frequently use sequences of the form this
field (in the example above: this
circle-radius). If you use the field only in this way, you can
define it with inst-var and eliminate the
this before the field name. E.g., the circle
class above could also be defined with:
graphical class cell% inst-var radius m: ( x y circle -- ) radius @ draw-circle ;m overrides draw m: ( n-radius circle -- ) radius ! ;m overrides construct end-class circle
radius can only be used in circle and its
descendent classes and inside m:...;m.
You can also define fields with inst-value, which is
to inst-var what value is to
variable. You can change the value of such a field with
[to-inst]. E.g., we could also define the class
circle like this:
graphical class inst-value radius m: ( x y circle -- ) radius draw-circle ;m overrides draw m: ( n-radius circle -- ) [to-inst] radius ;m overrides construct end-class circle
Inheritance is frequent, unlike structure extension. This exacerbates the problem with the field name convention (see section Structure Naming Convention): One always has to remember in which class the field was originally defined; changing a part of the class structure would require changes for renaming in otherwise unaffected code.
To solve this problem, I added a scoping mechanism (which was not in my
original charter): A field defined with inst-var (or
inst-value) is visible only in the class where it is defined and in
the descendent classes of this class. Using such fields only makes
sense in m:-defined methods in these classes anyway.
This scoping mechanism allows us to use the unadorned field name, because name clashes with unrelated words become much less likely.
Once we have this mechanism, we can also use it for controlling the
visibility of other words: All words defined after
protected are visible only in the current class and its
descendents. public restores the compilation
(i.e. current) word list that was in effect before. If you
have several protecteds without an intervening
public or set-current, public
will restore the compilation word list in effect before the first of
these protecteds.
You may want to do the definition of methods separate from the definition of the class, its selectors, fields, and instance variables, i.e., separate the implementation from the definition. You can do this in the following way:
graphical class inst-value radius end-class circle ... \ do some other stuff circle methods \ now we are ready m: ( x y circle -- ) radius draw-circle ;m overrides draw m: ( n-radius circle -- ) [to-inst] radius ;m overrides construct end-methods
You can use several methods...end-methods sections. The
only things you can do to the class in these sections are: defining
methods, and overriding the class's selectors. You must not define new
selectors or fields.
Note that you often have to override a selector before using it. In
particular, you usually have to override construct with a new
method before you can invoke heap-new and friends. E.g., you
must not create a circle before the overrides construct sequence
in the example above.
In this model you can only call selectors defined in the class of the receiving objects or in one of its ancestors. If you call a selector with a receiving object that is not in one of these classes, the result is undefined; if you are lucky, the program crashes immediately.
Now consider the case when you want to have a selector (or several)
available in two classes: You would have to add the selector to a
common ancestor class, in the worst case to object. You
may not want to do this, e.g., because someone else is responsible for
this ancestor class.
The solution for this problem is interfaces. An interface is a collection of selectors. If a class implements an interface, the selectors become available to the class and its descendents. A class can implement an unlimited number of interfaces. For the problem discussed above, we would define an interface for the selector(s), and both classes would implement the interface.
As an example, consider an interface storage for
writing objects to disk and getting them back, and a class
foo that implements it. The code would look like this:
interface selector write ( file object -- ) selector read1 ( file object -- ) end-interface storage bar class storage implementation ... overrides write ... overrides read1 ... end-class foo
(I would add a word read ( file -- object ) that uses
read1 internally, but that's beyond the point illustrated
here.)
Note that you cannot use protected in an interface; and
of course you cannot define fields.
In the Neon model, all selectors are available for all classes; therefore it does not need interfaces. The price you pay in this model is slower late binding, and therefore, added complexity to avoid late binding.
An object is a piece of memory, like one of the data structures
described with struct...end-struct. It has a field
object-map that points to the method map for the object's
class.
The method map(34) is an array that contains the execution tokens (xts) of the methods for the object's class. Each selector contains an offset into a method map.
selector is a defining word that uses
CREATE and DOES>. The body of the
selector contains the offset; the DOES> action for a
class selector is, basically:
( object addr ) @ over object-map @ + @ execute
Since object-map is the first field of the object, it
does not generate any code. As you can see, calling a selector has a
small, constant cost.
A class is basically a struct combined with a method
map. During the class definition the alignment and size of the class
are passed on the stack, just as with structs, so
field can also be used for defining class
fields. However, passing more items on the stack would be
inconvenient, so class builds a data structure in memory,
which is accessed through the variable
current-interface. After its definition is complete, the
class is represented on the stack by a pointer (e.g., as parameter for
a child class definition).
A new class starts off with the alignment and size of its parent,
and a copy of the parent's method map. Defining new fields extends the
size and alignment; likewise, defining new selectors extends the
method map. overrides just stores a new xt in the method
map at the offset given by the selector.
Class binding just gets the xt at the offset given by the selector
from the class's method map and compile,s (in the case of
[bind]) it.
I implemented this as a value. At the
start of an m:...;m method the old this is
stored to the return stack and restored at the end; and the object on
the TOS is stored TO this. This technique has one
disadvantage: If the user does not leave the method via
;m, but via throw or exit,
this is not restored (and exit may
crash). To deal with the throw problem, I have redefined
catch to save and restore this; the same
should be done with any word that can catch an exception. As for
exit, I simply forbid it (as a replacement, there is
exitm).
inst-var is just the same as field, with
a different DOES> action:
@ this +
Similar for inst-value.
Each class also has a word list that contains the words defined with
inst-var and inst-value, and its protected
words. It also has a pointer to its parent. class pushes
the word lists of the class and all its ancestors onto the search order stack,
and end-class drops them.
An interface is like a class without fields, parent and protected words; i.e., it just has a method map. If a class implements an interface, its method map contains a pointer to the method map of the interface. The positive offsets in the map are reserved for class methods, therefore interface map pointers have negative offsets. Interfaces have offsets that are unique throughout the system, unlike class selectors, whose offsets are only unique for the classes where the selector is available (invokable).
This structure means that interface selectors have to perform one
indirection more than class selectors to find their method. Their body
contains the interface map pointer offset in the class method map, and
the method offset in the interface method map. The
does> action for an interface selector is, basically:
( object selector-body ) 2dup selector-interface @ ( object selector-body object interface-offset ) swap object-map @ + @ ( object selector-body map ) swap selector-offset @ + @ execute
where object-map and selector-offset are
first fields and generate no code.
As a concrete example, consider the following code:
interface selector if1sel1 selector if1sel2 end-interface if1 object class if1 implementation selector cl1sel1 cell% inst-var cl1iv1 ' m1 overrides construct ' m2 overrides if1sel1 ' m3 overrides if1sel2 ' m4 overrides cl1sel2 end-class cl1 create obj1 object dict-new drop create obj2 cl1 dict-new drop
The data structure created by this code (including the data structure
for object) is shown in the
figure, assuming a cell size of 4.
bind ... "class" "selector" -- ... objects ``bind''
Execute the method for selector in class.
<bind> class selector-xt -- xt objects ``<bind>''
xt is the method for the selector selector-xt in class.
bind' "class" "selector" -- xt objects ``bind'''
xt is the method for selector in class.
[bind] compile-time: "class" "selector" -- ; run-time: ... object -- ... objects ``[bind]''
Compile the method for selector in class.
class parent-class -- align offset objects ``class''
Start a new class definition as a child of parent-class. align offset are for use by field etc.
class->map class -- map objects ``class->map''
map is the pointer to class's method map; it points to the place in the map to which the selector offsets refer (i.e., where object-maps point to).
class-inst-size class -- addr objects ``class-inst-size''
Give the size specification for an instance (i.e. an object)
of class;
used as class-inst-size 2 ( class -- align size ).
class-override! xt sel-xt class-map -- objects ``class-override!''
xt is the new method for the selector sel-xt in class-map.
class-previous class -- objects ``class-previous''
Drop class's wordlists from the search order. No checking is made whether class's wordlists are actually on the search order.
class>order class -- objects ``class>order''
Add class's wordlists to the head of the search-order.
construct ... object -- objects ``construct''
Initialize the data fields of object. The method for the
class object just does nothing: ( object -- ).
current' "selector" -- xt objects ``current'''
xt is the method for selector in the current class.
[current] compile-time: "selector" -- ; run-time: ... object -- ... objects ``[current]''
Compile the method for selector in the current class.
current-interface -- addr objects ``current-interface''
Variable: contains the class or interface currently being defined.
dict-new ... class -- object objects ``dict-new''
allot and initialize an object of class class in
the dictionary.
end-class align offset "name" -- objects ``end-class''
name execution: -- class
End a class definition. The resulting class is class.
end-class-noname align offset -- class objects ``end-class-noname''
End a class definition. The resulting class is class.
end-interface "name" -- objects ``end-interface''
name execution: -- interface
End an interface definition. The resulting interface is
interface.
end-interface-noname -- interface objects ``end-interface-noname''
End an interface definition. The resulting interface is interface.
end-methods -- objects ``end-methods''
Switch back from defining methods of a class to normal mode (currently this just restores the old search order).
exitm -- objects ``exitm''
exit from a method; restore old this.
heap-new ... class -- object objects ``heap-new''
allocate and initialize an object of class class.
implementation interface -- objects ``implementation''
The current class implements interface. I.e., you can use all selectors of the interface in the current class and its descendents.
init-object ... class object -- objects ``init-object''
Initialize a chunk of memory (object) to an object of
class class; then performs construct.
inst-value align1 offset1 "name" -- align2 offset2 objects ``inst-value''
name execution: -- w
w is the value of the field name in this
object.
inst-var align1 offset1 align size "name" -- align2 offset2 objects ``inst-var''
name execution: -- addr
addr is the address of the field name in
this object.
interface -- objects ``interface''
Start an interface definition.
m: -- xt colon-sys; run-time: object -- objects ``m:''
Start a method definition; object becomes new this.
:m "name" -- xt; run-time: object -- objects ``:m''
Start a named method definition; object becomes new
this. Has to be ended with ;m.
;m colon-sys --; run-time: -- objects ``;m''
End a method definition; restore old this.
method xt "name" -- objects ``method''
name execution: ... object -- ...
Create selector name and makes xt its method in
the current class.
methods class -- objects ``methods''
Makes class the current class. This is intended to be used for defining methods to override selectors; you cannot define new fields or selectors.
object -- class objects ``object''
the ancestor of all classes.
overrides xt "selector" -- objects ``overrides''
replace default method for selector in the current class
with xt. overrides must not be used during an
interface definition.
[parent] compile-time: "selector" -- ; run-time: ... object -- ... objects ``[parent]''
Compile the method for selector in the parent of the current class.
print object -- objects ``print''
Print the object. The method for the class object prints the address of the object and the address of its class.
protected -- objects ``protected''
Set the compilation wordlist to the current class's wordlist
public -- objects ``public''
Restore the compilation wordlist that was in effect before the
last protected that actually changed the compilation
wordlist.
selector "name" -- objects ``selector''
name execution: ... object -- ...
Create selector name for the current class and its
descendents; you can set a method for the selector in the
current class with overrides.
this -- object objects ``this''
the receiving object of the current method (aka active object).
<to-inst> w xt -- objects ``<to-inst>''
store w into the field xt in this object.
[to-inst] compile-time: "name" -- ; run-time: w -- objects ``[to-inst]''
store w into field name in this object.
to-this object -- objects ``to-this''
Set this (used internally, but useful when debugging).
xt-new ... class xt -- object objects ``xt-new''
Make a new object, using xt ( align size -- addr ) to
get memory.
This section describes the `oof.fs' package.
The package described in this section has been used in bigFORTH since 1991, and used for two large applications: a chromatographic system used to create new medicaments, and a graphic user interface library (MINOS).
You can find a description (in German) of `oof.fs' in Object oriented bigFORTH by Bernd Paysan, published in Vierte Dimension 10(2), 1994.
postpone and a selector '.
This section uses the same example as for objects (see section Basic `objects.fs' Usage).
You can define a class for graphical objects like this:
object class graphical \ "object" is the parent class method draw ( x y graphical -- ) class;
This code defines a class graphical with an
operation draw. We can perform the operation
draw on any graphical object, e.g.:
100 100 t-rex draw
where t-rex is an object or object pointer, created with e.g.
graphical : t-rex.
How do we create a graphical object? With the present definitions,
we cannot create a useful graphical object. The class
graphical describes graphical objects in general, but not
any concrete graphical object type (C++ users would call it an
abstract class); e.g., there is no method for the selector
draw in the class graphical.
For concrete graphical objects, we define child classes of the
class graphical, e.g.:
graphical class circle \ "graphical" is the parent class
cell var circle-radius
how:
: draw ( x y -- )
circle-radius @ draw-circle ;
: init ( n-radius -- (
circle-radius ! ;
class;
Here we define a class circle as a child of graphical,
with a field circle-radius; it defines new methods for the
selectors draw and init (init is defined in
object, the parent class of graphical).
Now we can create a circle in the dictionary with:
50 circle : my-circle
: invokes init, thus initializing the field
circle-radius with 50. We can draw this new circle at (100,100)
with:
100 100 my-circle draw
Note: You can only invoke a selector if the receiving object belongs to
the class where the selector was defined or one of its descendents;
e.g., you can invoke draw only for objects belonging to
graphical or its descendents (e.g., circle). The scoping
mechanism will check if you try to invoke a selector that is not
defined in this class hierarchy, so you'll get an error at compilation
time.
When you define a class, you have to specify a parent class. So how do
you start defining classes? There is one class available from the start:
object. You have to use it as ancestor for all classes. It is the
only class that has no parent. Classes are also objects, except that
they don't have instance variables; class manipulation such as
inheritance or changing definitions of a class is handled through
selectors of the class object.
object provides a number of selectors:
class for subclassing, definitions to add definitions
later on, and class? to get type informations (is the class a
subclass of the class passed on the stack?).
class "name" -- oof ``class''
definitions -- oof ``definitions''
class? o -- flag oof ``class-query''
init and dispose as constructor and destructor of the
object. init is invocated after the object's memory is allocated,
while dispose also handles deallocation. Thus if you redefine
dispose, you have to call the parent's dispose with super
dispose, too.
init ... -- oof ``init''
dispose -- oof ``dispose''
new, new[], :, ptr, asptr, and
[] to create named and unnamed objects and object arrays or
object pointers.
new -- o oof ``new''
new[] n -- o oof ``new-array''
: "name" -- oof ``define''
ptr "name" -- oof ``ptr''
asptr o "name" -- oof ``asptr''
[] n "name" -- oof ``array''
:: and super for explicit scoping. You should use explicit
scoping only for super classes or classes with the same set of instance
variables. Explicitly-scoped selectors use early binding.
:: "name" -- oof ``scope''
super "name" -- oof ``super''
self to get the address of the object
self -- o oof ``self''
bind, bound, link, and is to assign object
pointers and instance defers.
bind o "name" -- oof ``bind''
bound class addr "name" -- oof ``bound''
link "name" -- class addr oof ``link''
is xt "name" -- oof ``is''
' to obtain selector tokens, send to invocate selectors
form the stack, and postpone to generate selector invocation code.
' "name" -- xt oof ``tick''
postpone "name" -- oof ``postpone''
with and endwith to select the active object from the
stack, and enable its scope. Using with and endwith
also allows you to create code using selector postpone without being
trapped by the state-smart objects.
with o -- oof ``with''
endwith -- oof ``endwith''
var size -- oof ``var''
Create an instance variable
ptr -- oof ``ptr''
Create an instance pointer
asptr class -- oof ``asptr''
Create an alias to an instance pointer, cast to another class.
defer -- oof ``defer''
Create an instance defer
early -- oof ``early''
Create a method selector for early binding.
method -- oof ``method''
Create a method selector.
static -- oof ``static''
Create a class-wide cell-sized variable.
how: -- oof ``how-to''
End declaration, start implementation
class; -- oof ``end-class''
End class declaration or implementation
Gforth's third object oriented Forth package is a 12-liner. It uses a mixture of the `objects.fs' and the `oof.fs' syntax, and reduces to the bare minimum of features. This is based on a posting of Bernd Paysan in comp.lang.forth.
There is a base class (class, which allocates one cell for the
object pointer) plus seven other words: to define a method, a variable,
a class; to end a class, to resolve binding, to allocate an object and
to compile a class method.
object -- a-addr mini-oof ``object''
object is the base class of all objects.
method m v "name" -- m' v mini-oof ``method''
Define a selector.
var m v size "name" -- m v' mini-oof ``var''
Define a variable with size bytes.
class class -- class selectors vars mini-oof ``class''
Start the definition of a class.
end-class class selectors vars "name" -- mini-oof ``end-class''
End the definition of a class.
defines xt class "name" -- mini-oof ``defines''
Bind xt to the selector name in class class.
new class -- o mini-oof ``new''
Create a new incarnation of the class class.
:: class "name" -- mini-oof ``colon-colon''
Compile the method for the selector name of the class class (not immediate!).
A short example shows how to use this package. This example, in slightly extended form, is supplied as `moof-exm.fs'
object class method init method draw end-class graphical
This code defines a class graphical with an
operation draw. We can perform the operation
draw on any graphical object, e.g.:
100 100 t-rex draw
where t-rex is an object or object pointer, created with e.g.
graphical new Constant t-rex.
For concrete graphical objects, we define child classes of the
class graphical, e.g.:
graphical class cell var circle-radius end-class circle \ "graphical" is the parent class :noname ( x y -- ) circle-radius @ draw-circle ; circle defines draw :noname ( r -- ) circle-radius ! ; circle defines init
There is no implicit init method, so we have to define one. The creation code of the object now has to call init explicitely.
circle new Constant my-circle 50 my-circle init
It is also possible to add a function to create named objects with
automatic call of init, given that all objects have init
on the same place:
: new: ( .. o "name" -- )
new dup Constant init ;
80 circle new: large-circle
We can draw this new circle at (100,100) with:
100 100 my-circle draw
Object-oriented systems with late binding typically use a "vtable"-approach: the first variable in each object is a pointer to a table, which contains the methods as function pointers. The vtable may also contain other information.
So first, let's declare selectors:
: method ( m v "name" -- m' v ) Create over , swap cell+ swap DOES> ( ... o -- ... ) @ over @ + @ execute ;
During selector declaration, the number of selectors and instance
variables is on the stack (in address units). method creates one
selector and increments the selector number. To execute a selector, it
takes the object, fetches the vtable pointer, adds the offset, and
executes the method xt stored there. Each selector takes the object
it is invoked with as top of stack parameter; it passes the parameters
(including the object) unchanged to the appropriate method which should
consume that object.
Now, we also have to declare instance variables
: var ( m v size "name" -- m v' ) Create over , + DOES> ( o -- addr ) @ + ;
As before, a word is created with the current offset. Instance
variables can have different sizes (cells, floats, doubles, chars), so
all we do is take the size and add it to the offset. If your machine
has alignment restrictions, put the proper aligned or
faligned before the variable, to adjust the variable
offset. That's why it is on the top of stack.
We need a starting point (the base object) and some syntactic sugar:
Create object 1 cells , 2 cells , : class ( class -- class selectors vars ) dup 2@ ;
For inheritance, the vtable of the parent object has to be copied when a new, derived class is declared. This gives all the methods of the parent class, which can be overridden, though.
: end-class ( class selectors vars "name" -- ) Create here >r , dup , 2 cells ?DO ['] noop , 1 cells +LOOP cell+ dup cell+ r> rot @ 2 cells /string move ;
The first line creates the vtable, initialized with
noops. The second line is the inheritance mechanism, it
copies the xts from the parent vtable.
We still have no way to define new methods, let's do that now:
: defines ( xt class "name" -- ) ' >body @ + ! ;
To allocate a new object, we need a word, too:
: new ( class -- o ) here over @ allot swap over ! ;
Sometimes derived classes want to access the method of the parent object. There are two ways to achieve this with Mini-OOF: first, you could use named words, and second, you could look up the vtable of the parent object.
: :: ( class "name" -- ) ' >body @ + @ compile, ;
Nothing can be more confusing than a good example, so here is
one. First let's declare a text object (called
button), that stores text and position:
object class cell var text cell var len cell var x cell var y method init method draw end-class button
Now, implement the two methods, draw and init:
:noname ( o -- ) >r r@ x @ r@ y @ at-xy r@ text @ r> len @ type ; button defines draw :noname ( addr u o -- ) >r 0 r@ x ! 0 r@ y ! r@ len ! r> text ! ; button defines init
To demonstrate inheritance, we define a class bold-button, with no
new data and no new selectors:
button class end-class bold-button : bold 27 emit ." [1m" ; : normal 27 emit ." [0m" ;
The class bold-button has a different draw method to
button, but the new method is defined in terms of the draw method
for button:
:noname bold [ button :: draw ] normal ; bold-button defines draw
Finally, create two objects and apply selectors:
button new Constant foo s" thin foo" foo init page foo draw bold-button new Constant bar s" fat bar" bar init 1 bar y ! bar draw
Many object-oriented Forth extensions have been proposed (A survey of object-oriented Forths (SIGPLAN Notices, April 1996) by Bradford J. Rodriguez and W. F. S. Poehlman lists 17). This section discusses the relation of the object models described here to two well-known and two closely-related (by the use of method maps) models. Andras Zsoter helped us with this section.
The most popular model currently seems to be the Neon model (see Object-oriented programming in ANS Forth (Forth Dimensions, March 1997) by Andrew McKewan) but this model has a number of limitations (35):
selector object syntax, which makes it unnatural
to pass objects on the stack.
Another well-known publication is Object-Oriented Forth (Academic Press, London, 1987) by Dick Pountain. However, it is not really about object-oriented programming, because it hardly deals with late binding. Instead, it focuses on features like information hiding and overloading that are characteristic of modular languages like Ada (83).
In Does late binding have to be
slow? (Forth Dimensions 18(1) 1996, pages 31-35) Andras Zsoter
describes a model that makes heavy use of an active object (like
this in `objects.fs'): The active object is not only used
for accessing all fields, but also specifies the receiving object of
every selector invocation; you have to change the active object
explicitly with { ... }, whereas in `objects.fs' it
changes more or less implicitly at m: ... ;m. Such a change at
the method entry point is unnecessary with Zsoter's model, because the
receiving object is the active object already. On the other hand, the
explicit change is absolutely necessary in that model, because otherwise
no one could ever change the active object. An ANS Forth implementation
of this model is available through
http://www.forth.org/oopf.html.
The `oof.fs' model combines information hiding and overloading
resolution (by keeping names in various word lists) with object-oriented
programming. It sets the active object implicitly on method entry, but
also allows explicit changing (with >o...o> or with
with...endwith). It uses parsing and state-smart objects and
classes for resolving overloading and for early binding: the object or
class parses the selector and determines the method from this. If the
selector is not parsed by an object or class, it performs a call to the
selector for the active object (late binding), like Zsoter's model.
Fields are always accessed through the active object. The big
disadvantage of this model is the parsing and the state-smartness, which
reduces extensibility and increases the opportunities for subtle bugs;
essentially, you are only safe if you never tick or postpone an
object or class (Bernd disagrees, but I (Anton) am not convinced).
The `mini-oof.fs' model is quite similar to a very stripped-down version of the `objects.fs' model, but syntactically it is a mixture of the `objects.fs' and `oof.fs' models.
The following words inspect the stack non-destructively:
.s -- tools ``dot-s''
Display the number of items on the data stack, followed by a list of the items; TOS is the right-most item.
f.s -- gforth ``f-dot-s''
Display the number of items on the floating-point stack, followed by a list of the items; TOS is the right-most item.
There is a word .r but it does not display the return stack!
It is used for formatted numeric output (see section Simple numeric output).
depth -- +n core ``depth''
+n is the number of values that were on the data stack before +n itself was placed on the stack.
fdepth -- +n float ``f-depth''
+n is the current number of (floating-point) values on the floating-point stack.
clearstack ... -- gforth ``clear-stack''
remove and discard all/any items from the data stack.
The following words inspect memory.
? a-addr -- tools ``question''
Display the contents of address a-addr in the current number base.
dump addr u -- tools ``dump''
Display u lines of memory starting at address addr. Each line displays the contents of 16 bytes. When Gforth is running under an operating system you may get `Invalid memory address' errors if you attempt to access arbitrary locations.
And finally, see allows to inspect code:
see "<spaces>name" -- tools ``see''
Locate name using the current search order. Display the definition of name. Since this is achieved by decompiling the definition, the formatting is mechanised and some source information (comments, interpreted sequences within definitions etc.) is lost.
xt-see xt -- gforth ``xt-see''
Decompile the definition represented by xt.
simple-see "name" -- gforth ``simple-see''
a simple decompiler that's closer to dump than see.
simple-see-range addr1 addr2 -- gforth ``simple-see-range''
Forth allows you to forget words (and everything that was alloted in the dictonary after them) in a LIFO manner.
marker "<spaces> name" -- core-ext ``marker''
Create a definition, name (called a mark) whose execution semantics are to remove itself and everything defined after it.
The most common use of this feature is during progam development: when you change a source file, forget all the words it defined and load it again (since you also forget everything defined after the source file was loaded, you have to reload that, too). Note that effects like storing to variables and destroyed system words are not undone when you forget words. With a system like Gforth, that is fast enough at starting up and compiling, I find it more convenient to exit and restart Gforth, as this gives me a clean slate.
Here's an example of using marker at the start of a source file
that you are debugging; it ensures that you only ever have one copy of
the file's definitions compiled at any time:
[IFDEF] my-code
my-code
[ENDIF]
marker my-code
init-included-files
\ .. definitions start here
\ .
\ .
\ end
Languages with a slow edit/compile/link/test development loop tend to require sophisticated tracing/stepping debuggers to facilate debugging.
A much better (faster) way in fast-compiling languages is to add printing code at well-selected places, let the program run, look at the output, see where things went wrong, add more printing code, etc., until the bug is found.
The simple debugging aids provided in `debugs.fs' are meant to support this style of debugging.
The word ~~ prints debugging information (by default the source
location and the stack contents). It is easy to insert. If you use Emacs
it is also easy to remove (C-x ~ in the Emacs Forth mode to
query-replace them with nothing). The deferred words
printdebugdata and .debugline control the output of
~~. The default source location output format works well with
Emacs' compilation mode, so you can step through the program at the
source level using C-x ` (the advantage over a stepping debugger
is that you can step in any direction and you know where the crash has
happened or where the strange data has occurred).
~~ compilation -- ; run-time -- gforth ``tilde-tilde''
printdebugdata -- gforth ``print-debug-data''
.debugline nfile nline -- gforth ``print-debug-line''
~~ (and assertions) will usually print the wrong file name if a
marker is executed in the same file after their occurance. They will
print `*somewhere*' as file name if a marker is executed in the
same file before their occurance.
It is a good idea to make your programs self-checking, especially if you make an assumption that may become invalid during maintenance (for example, that a certain field of a data structure is never zero). Gforth supports assertions for this purpose. They are used like this:
assert( flag )
The code between assert( and ) should compute a flag, that
should be true if everything is alright and false otherwise. It should
not change anything else on the stack. The overall stack effect of the
assertion is ( -- ). E.g.
assert( 1 1 + 2 = ) \ what we learn in school assert( dup 0<> ) \ assert that the top of stack is not zero assert( false ) \ this code should not be reached
The need for assertions is different at different times. During debugging, we want more checking, in production we sometimes care more for speed. Therefore, assertions can be turned off, i.e., the assertion becomes a comment. Depending on the importance of an assertion and the time it takes to check it, you may want to turn off some assertions and keep others turned on. Gforth provides several levels of assertions for this purpose:
assert0( -- gforth ``assert-zero''
Important assertions that should always be turned on.
assert1( -- gforth ``assert-one''
Normal assertions; turned on by default.
assert2( -- gforth ``assert-two''
Debugging assertions.
assert3( -- gforth ``assert-three''
Slow assertions that you may not want to turn on in normal debugging; you would turn them on mainly for thorough checking.
assert( -- gforth ``assert(''
Equivalent to assert1(
) -- gforth ``close-paren''
End an assertion.
The variable assert-level specifies the highest assertions that
are turned on. I.e., at the default assert-level of one,
assert0( and assert1( assertions perform checking, while
assert2( and assert3( assertions are treated as comments.
The value of assert-level is evaluated at compile-time, not at
run-time. Therefore you cannot turn assertions on or off at run-time;
you have to set the assert-level appropriately before compiling a
piece of code. You can compile different pieces of code at different
assert-levels (e.g., a trusted library at level 1 and
newly-written code at level 3).
assert-level -- a-addr gforth ``assert-level''
All assertions above this level are turned off.
If an assertion fails, a message compatible with Emacs' compilation mode
is produced and the execution is aborted (currently with ABORT".
If there is interest, we will introduce a special throw code. But if you
intend to catch a specific condition, using throw is
probably more appropriate than an assertion).
Assertions (and ~~) will usually print the wrong file name if a
marker is executed in the same file after their occurance. They will
print `*somewhere*' as file name if a marker is executed in the
same file before their occurance.
Definitions in ANS Forth for these assertion words are provided in `compat/assert.fs'.
The singlestep debugger does not work in this release.
When you create a new word there's often the need to check whether it
behaves correctly or not. You can do this by typing dbg
badword. A debug session might look like this:
: badword 0 DO i . LOOP ; ok 2 dbg badword : badword Scanning code... Nesting debugger ready! 400D4738 8049BC4 0 -> [ 2 ] 00002 00000 400D4740 8049F68 DO -> [ 0 ] 400D4744 804A0C8 i -> [ 1 ] 00000 400D4748 400C5E60 . -> 0 [ 0 ] 400D474C 8049D0C LOOP -> [ 0 ] 400D4744 804A0C8 i -> [ 1 ] 00001 400D4748 400C5E60 . -> 1 [ 0 ] 400D474C 8049D0C LOOP -> [ 0 ] 400D4758 804B384 ; -> ok
Each line displayed is one step. You always have to hit return to
execute the next word that is displayed. If you don't want to execute
the next word in a whole, you have to type n for nest. Here is
an overview what keys are available:
Debugging large application with this mechanism is very difficult, because you have to nest very deeply into the program before the interesting part begins. This takes a lot of time.
To do it more directly put a BREAK: command into your source code.
When program execution reaches BREAK: the single step debugger is
invoked and you have all the features described above.
If you have more than one part to debug it is useful to know where the
program has stopped at the moment. You can do this by the
BREAK" string" command. This behaves like BREAK: except that
string is typed out when the "breakpoint" is reached.
dbg "name" -- gforth ``dbg''
break: -- gforth ``break:''
break" 'ccc"' -- gforth ``break"''
Code and ;code
Gforth provides some words for defining primitives (words written in
machine code), and for defining the machine-code equivalent of
DOES>-based defining words. However, the machine-independent
nature of Gforth poses a few problems: First of all, Gforth runs on
several architectures, so it can provide no standard assembler. What's
worse is that the register allocation not only depends on the processor,
but also on the gcc version and options used.
The words that Gforth offers encapsulate some system dependences (e.g.,
the header structure), so a system-independent assembler may be used in
Gforth. If you do not have an assembler, you can compile machine code
directly with , and c,(36).
assembler -- tools-ext ``assembler''
init-asm -- gforth ``init-asm''
code "name" -- colon-sys tools-ext ``code''
end-code colon-sys -- gforth ``end-code''
;code compilation. colon-sys1 -- colon-sys2 tools-ext ``semicolon-code''
flush-icache c-addr u -- gforth ``flush-icache''
Make sure that the instruction cache of the processor (if there is
one) does not contain stale data at c-addr and u bytes
afterwards. END-CODE performs a flush-icache
automatically. Caveat: flush-icache might not work on your
installation; this is usually the case if direct threading is not
supported on your machine (take a look at your `machine.h') and
your machine has a separate instruction cache. In such cases,
flush-icache does nothing instead of flushing the instruction
cache.
If flush-icache does not work correctly, code words
etc. will not work (reliably), either.
The typical usage of these code words can be shown most easily by
analogy to the equivalent high-level defining words:
: foo code foo
<high-level Forth words> <assembler>
; end-code
: bar : bar
<high-level Forth words> <high-level Forth words>
CREATE CREATE
<high-level Forth words> <high-level Forth words>
DOES> ;code
<high-level Forth words> <assembler>
; end-code
In the assembly code you will want to refer to the inner interpreter's registers (e.g., the data stack pointer) and you may want to use other registers for temporary storage. Unfortunately, the register allocation is installation-dependent.
In particular, ip (Forth instruction pointer) and rp
(return stack pointer) may be in different places in gforth and
gforth-fast, or different installations. This means that you
cannot write a NEXT routine that works reliably on both versions
or different installations; so for doing NEXT, I recommend
jumping to ' noop >code-address, which contains nothing but a
NEXT.
For general accesses to the inner interpreter's registers, the easiest
solution is to use explicit register declarations (see section `Variables in Specified Registers' in GNU C Manual) for
all of the inner interpreter's registers: You have to compile Gforth
with -DFORCE_REG (configure option --enable-force-reg) and
the appropriate declarations must be present in the machine.h
file (see mips.h for an example; you can find a full list of all
declarable register symbols with grep register engine.c). If you
give explicit registers to all variables that are declared at the
beginning of engine(), you should be able to use the other
caller-saved registers for temporary storage. Alternatively, you can use
the gcc option -ffixed-REG (see section `Options for Code Generation Conventions' in GNU C Manual) to
reserve a register (however, this restriction on register allocation may
slow Gforth significantly).
If this solution is not viable (e.g., because gcc does not allow
you to explicitly declare all the registers you need), you have to find
out by looking at the code where the inner interpreter's registers
reside and which registers can be used for temporary storage. You can
get an assembly listing of the engine's code with make engine.s.
In any case, it is good practice to abstract your assembly code from the
actual register allocation. E.g., if the data stack pointer resides in
register $17, create an alias for this register called sp,
and use that in your assembly code.
Another option for implementing normal and defining words efficiently
is to add the desired functionality to the source of Gforth. For normal
words you just have to edit `primitives' (see section Automatic Generation). Defining words (equivalent to ;CODE words, for fast
defined words) may require changes in `engine.c', `kernel.fs',
`prims2x.fs', and possibly `cross.fs'.
The assemblers in Gforth generally use a postfix syntax, i.e., the instruction name follows the operands.
The operands are passed in the usual order (the same that is used in the manual of the architecture). Since they all are Forth words, they have to be separated by spaces; you can also use Forth words to compute the operands.
The instruction names usually end with a ,. This makes it easier
to visually separate instructions if you put several of them on one
line; it also avoids shadowing other Forth words (e.g., and).
Registers are usually specified by number; e.g., (decimal) 11
specifies registers R11 and F11 on the Alpha architecture (which one,
depends on the instruction). The usual names are also available, e.g.,
s2 for R11 on Alpha.
Control flow is specified similar to normal Forth code (see section Arbitrary control structures), with if,, ahead,, then,,
begin,, until,, again,, cs-roll,
cs-pick, else,, while,, and repeat,. The
conditions are specified in a way specific to each assembler.
Note that the register assignments of the Gforth engine can change
between Gforth versions, or even between different compilations of the
same Gforth version (e.g., if you use a different GCC version). So if
you want to refer to Gforth's registers (e.g., the stack pointer or
TOS), I recommend defining your own words for refering to these
registers, and using them later on; then you can easily adapt to a
changed register assignment. The stability of the register assignment
is usually better if you build Gforth with --enable-force-reg.
The most common use of these registers is to dispatch to the next word
(the next routine). A portable way to do this is to jump to
' noop >code-address (of course, this is less efficient than
integrating the next code and scheduling it well).
Another difference between Gforth version is that the top of stack is
kept in memory in gforth and, on most platforms, in a register in
gforth-fast.
You can disassemble a code word with see
(see section Debugging). You can disassemble a section of memory with
doc-disasm
The disassembler generally produces output that can be fed into the assembler (i.e., same syntax, etc.). It also includes additional information in comments. In particular, the address of the instruction is given in a comment before the instruction.
See may display more or less than the actual code of the word,
because the recognition of the end of the code is unreliable. You can
use disasm if it did not display enough. It may display more, if
the code word is not immediately followed by a named word. If you have
something else there, you can follow the word with align latest ,
to ensure that the end is recognized.
The 386 assembler included in Gforth was written by Bernd Paysan, it's available under GPL, and originally part of bigFORTH.
The 386 disassembler included in Gforth was written by Andrew McKewan and is in the public domain.
The disassembler displays code in an Intel-like prefix syntax.
The assembler uses a postfix syntax with reversed parameters.
The assembler includes all instruction of the Athlon, i.e. 486 core instructions, Pentium and PPro extensions, floating point, MMX, 3Dnow!, but not ISSE. It's an integrated 16- and 32-bit assembler. Default is 32 bit, you can switch to 16 bit with .86 and back to 32 bit with .386.
There are several prefixes to switch between different operation sizes,
.b for byte accesses, .w for word accesses, .d for
double-word accesses. Addressing modes can be switched with .wa
for 16 bit addresses, and .da for 32 bit addresses. You don't
need a prefix for byte register names (AL et al).
For floating point operations, the prefixes are .fs (IEEE
single), .fl (IEEE double), .fx (extended), .fw
(word), .fd (double-word), and .fq (quad-word).
The MMX opcodes don't have size prefixes, they are spelled out like in the Intel assembler. Instead of move from and to memory, there are PLDQ/PLDD and PSTQ/PSTD.
The registers lack the 'e' prefix; even in 32 bit mode, eax is called
ax. Immediate values are indicated by postfixing them with #,
e.g., 3 #. Here are some examples of addressing modes in various
syntaxes:
Gforth Intel (NASM) AT&T (gas) Name .w ax ax %ax register (16 bit) ax eax %eax register (32 bit) 3 # offset 3 $3 immediate 1000 #) byte ptr 1000 1000 displacement bx ) [ebx] (%ebx) base 100 di d) 100[edi] 100(%edi) base+displacement 20 ax *4 i#) 20[eax*4] 20(,%eax,4) (index*scale)+displacement di ax *4 i) [edi][eax*4] (%edi,%eax,4) base+(index*scale) 4 bx cx di) 4[ebx][ecx] 4(%ebx,%ecx) base+index+displacement 12 sp ax *2 di) 12[esp][eax*2] 12(%esp,%eax,2) base+(index*scale)+displacement
You can use L) and LI) instead of D) and
DI) to enforce 32-bit displacement fields (useful for
later patching).
Some example of instructions are:
ax bx mov \ move ebx,eax 3 # ax mov \ mov eax,3 100 di ) ax mov \ mov eax,100[edi] 4 bx cx di) ax mov \ mov eax,4[ebx][ecx] .w ax bx mov \ mov bx,ax
The following forms are supported for binary instructions:
<reg> <reg> <inst> <n> # <reg> <inst> <mem> <reg> <inst> <reg> <mem> <inst>
Immediate to memory is not supported. The shift/rotate syntax is:
<reg/mem> 1 # shl \ shortens to shift without immediate <reg/mem> 4 # shl <reg/mem> cl shl
Precede string instructions (movs etc.) with .b to get
the byte version.
The control structure words IF UNTIL etc. must be preceded
by one of these conditions: vs vc u< u>= 0= 0<> u<= u> 0< 0>= ps
pc < >= <= >. (Note that most of these words shadow some Forth words
when assembler is in front of forth in the search path,
e.g., in code words). Currently the control structure words use
one stack item, so you have to use roll instead of cs-roll
to shuffle them (you can also use swap etc.).
Here is an example of a code word (assumes that the stack pointer
is in esi and the TOS is in ebx):
code my+ ( n1 n2 -- n )
4 si D) bx add
4 # si add
Next
end-code
The Alpha assembler and disassembler were originally written by Bernd Thallner.
The register names a0--a5 are not available to avoid
shadowing hex numbers.
Immediate forms of arithmetic instructions are distinguished by a
# just before the ,, e.g., and#, (note: lda,
does not count as arithmetic instruction).
You have to specify all operands to an instruction, even those that
other assemblers consider optional, e.g., the destination register for
br,, or the destination register and hint for jmp,.
You can specify conditions for if, by removing the first b
and the trailing , from a branch with a corresponding name; e.g.,
11 fgt if, \ if F11>0e ... endif,
fbgt, gives fgt.
The MIPS assembler was originally written by Christian Pirker.
Currently the assembler and disassembler only cover the MIPS-I architecture (R3000), and don't support FP instructions.
The register names $a0--$a3 are not available to avoid
shadowing hex numbers.
Because there is no way to distinguish registers from immediate values,
you have to explicitly use the immediate forms of instructions, i.e.,
addiu,, not just addu, (@command{as} does this
implicitly).
If the architecture manual specifies several formats for the instruction
(e.g., for jalr,), you usually have to use the one with more
arguments (i.e., two for jalr,). When in doubt, see
arch/mips/testasm.fs for an example of correct use.
Branches and jumps in the MIPS architecture have a delay slot. You have
to fill it yourself (the simplest way is to use nop,), the
assembler does not do it for you (unlike @command{as}). Even
if,, ahead,, until,, again,, while,,
else, and repeat, need a delay slot. Since begin,
and then, just specify branch targets, they are not affected.
Note that you must not put branches, jumps, or li, into the delay
slot: li, may expand to several instructions, and control flow
instructions may not be put into the branch delay slot in any case.
For branches the argument specifying the target is a relative address; You have to add the address of the delay slot to get the absolute address.
The MIPS architecture also has load delay slots and restrictions on
using mfhi, and mflo,; you have to order the instructions
yourself to satisfy these restrictions, the assembler does not do it for
you.
You can specify the conditions for if, etc. by taking a
conditional branch and leaving away the b at the start and the
, at the end. E.g.,
4 5 eq if, ... \ do something if $4 equals $5 then,
If you want to contribute another assembler/disassembler, please contact us (anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at) to check if we have such an assembler already. If you are writing them from scratch, please use a similar syntax style as the one we use (i.e., postfix, commas at the end of the instruction names, see section Common Assembler); make the output of the disassembler be valid input for the assembler, and keep the style similar to the style we used.
Hints on implementation: The most important part is to have a good test suite that contains all instructions. Once you have that, the rest is easy. For actual coding you can take a look at `arch/mips/disasm.fs' to get some ideas on how to use data for both the assembler and disassembler, avoiding redundancy and some potential bugs. You can also look at that file (and see section Advanced does> usage example) to get ideas how to factor a disassembler.
Start with the disassembler, because it's easier to reuse data from the disassembler for the assembler than the other way round.
For the assembler, take a look at `arch/alpha/asm.fs', which shows how simple it can be.
These words provide access to code addresses and other threading stuff in Gforth (and, possibly, other interpretive Forths). It more or less abstracts away the differences between direct and indirect threading (and, for direct threading, the machine dependences). However, at present this wordset is still incomplete. It is also pretty low-level; some day it will hopefully be made unnecessary by an internals wordset that abstracts implementation details away completely.
The terminology used here stems from indirect threaded Forth systems; in
such a system, the XT of a word is represented by the CFA (code field
address) of a word; the CFA points to a cell that contains the code
address. The code address is the address of some machine code that
performs the run-time action of invoking the word (e.g., the
dovar: routine pushes the address of the body of the word (a
variable) on the stack
).
In an indirect threaded Forth, you can get the code address of name
with ' name @; in Gforth you can get it with ' name
>code-address, independent of the threading method.
threading-method -- n gforth ``threading-method''
0 if the engine is direct threaded. Note that this may change during the lifetime of an image.
>code-address xt -- c_addr gforth ``>code-address''
c-addr is the code address of the word xt.
code-address! c_addr xt -- gforth ``code-address!''
Create a code field with code address c-addr at xt.
For a word defined with DOES>, the code address usually points to
a jump instruction (the does-handler) that jumps to the dodoes
routine (in Gforth on some platforms, it can also point to the dodoes
routine itself). What you are typically interested in, though, is
whether a word is a DOES>-defined word, and what Forth code it
executes; >does-code tells you that.
>does-code xt -- a_addr gforth ``>does-code''
If xt is the execution token of a child of a DOES> word,
a-addr is the start of the Forth code after the DOES>;
Otherwise a-addr is 0.
To create a DOES>-defined word with the following basic words,
you have to set up a DOES>-handler with does-handler!;
/does-handler aus behind you have to place your executable Forth
code. Finally you have to create a word and modify its behaviour with
does-handler!.
does-code! a_addr xt -- gforth ``does-code!''
Create a code field at xt for a child of a DOES>-word;
a-addr is the start of the Forth code after DOES>.
does-handler! a_addr -- gforth ``does-handler!''
Create a DOES>-handler at address a-addr. Normally,
a-addr points just behind a DOES>.
/does-handler -- n gforth ``/does-handler''
The size of a DOES>-handler (includes possible padding).
The code addresses produced by various defining words are produced by the following words:
docol: -- addr gforth ``docol:''
The code address of a colon definition.
docon: -- addr gforth ``docon:''
The code address of a CONSTANT.
dovar: -- addr gforth ``dovar:''
The code address of a CREATEd word.
douser: -- addr gforth ``douser:''
The code address of a USER variable.
dodefer: -- addr gforth ``dodefer:''
The code address of a defered word.
dofield: -- addr gforth ``dofield:''
The code address of a field.
The following two words generalize >code-address,
>does-code, code-address!, and does-code!:
>definer xt -- definer unknown ``>definer''
Definer is a unique identifier for the way the xt
was defined. Words defined with different does>-codes
have different definers. The definer can be used for
comparison and in definer!.
definer! definer xt -- unknown ``definer!''
The word represented by xt changes its behaviour to the behaviour associated with definer.
Gforth allows you to pass an arbitrary string to the host operating system shell (if such a thing exists) for execution.
sh "..." -- gforth ``sh''
Parse a string and use system to pass it to the host
operating system for execution in a sub-shell.
system c-addr u -- gforth ``system''
Pass the string specified by c-addr u to the host operating system for execution in a sub-shell.
$? -- n gforth ``dollar-question''
Value -- the exit status returned by the most recently executed
system command.
getenv c-addr1 u1 -- c-addr2 u2 gforth ``getenv''
The string c-addr1 u1 specifies an environment variable. The string c-addr2 u2 is the host operating system's expansion of that environment variable. If the environment variable does not exist, c-addr2 u2 specifies a string 0 characters in length.
ms n -- facility-ext ``ms''
Wait at least n milli-second.
time&date -- nsec nmin nhour nday nmonth nyear facility-ext ``time-and-date''
Report the current time of day. Seconds, minutes and hours are numbered from 0. Months are numbered from 1.
utime -- dtime gforth ``utime''
Report the current time in microseconds since some epoch.
cputime -- duser dsystem gforth ``cputime''
duser and dsystem are the respective user- and system-level CPU times used since the start of the Forth system (excluding child processes), in microseconds (the granularity may be much larger, however). On platforms without the getrusage call, it reports elapsed time (since some epoch) for duser and 0 for dsystem.
These section lists the ANS Forth words that are not documented elsewhere in this manual. Ultimately, they all need proper homes.
quit ?? -- ?? core ``quit''
Empty the return stack, make the user input device the input source, enter interpret state and start the text interpreter.
The following ANS Forth words are not currently supported by Gforth (see section ANS conformance):
EDITOR
EMIT?
FORGET
A typical Gforth error message looks like this:
in file included from \evaluated string/:-1 in file included from ./yyy.fs:1 ./xxx.fs:4: Invalid memory address bar ^^^ Backtrace: $400E664C @ $400E6664 foo
The message identifying the error is Invalid memory address. The
error happened when text-interpreting line 4 of the file
`./xxx.fs'. This line is given (it contains bar), and the
word on the line where the error happened, is pointed out (with
^^^).
The file containing the error was included in line 1 of `./yyy.fs', and `yyy.fs' was included from a non-file (in this case, by giving `yyy.fs' as command-line parameter to Gforth).
At the end of the error message you find a return stack dump that can be
interpreted as a backtrace (possibly empty). On top you find the top of
the return stack when the throw happened, and at the bottom you
find the return stack entry just above the return stack of the topmost
text interpreter.
To the right of most return stack entries you see a guess for the word
that pushed that return stack entry as its return address. This gives a
backtrace. In our case we see that bar called foo, and
foo called @ (and @ had an Invalid memory
address exception).
Note that the backtrace is not perfect: We don't know which return stack
entries are return addresses (so we may get false positives); and in
some cases (e.g., for abort") we cannot determine from the return
address the word that pushed the return address, so for some return
addresses you see no names in the return stack dump.
The return stack dump represents the return stack at the time when a
specific throw was executed. In programs that make use of
catch, it is not necessarily clear which throw should be
used for the return stack dump (e.g., consider one throw that
indicates an error, which is caught, and during recovery another error
happens; which throw should be used for the stack dump?). Gforth
presents the return stack dump for the first throw after the last
executed (not returned-to) catch; this works well in the usual
case.
Gforth is able to do a return stack dump for throws generated
from primitives (e.g., invalid memory address, stack empty etc.);
gforth-fast is only able to do a return stack dump from a
directly called throw (including abort etc.). Given an
exception caused by a primitive in gforth-fast, you will
typically see no return stack dump at all; however, if the exception is
caught by catch (e.g., for restoring some state), and then
thrown again, the return stack dump will be for the first such
throw.
See also section Emacs and Gforth.
If you want to label a Forth program as ANS Forth Program, you must document which wordsets the program uses; for extension wordsets, it is helpful to list the words the program requires from these wordsets (because Forth systems are allowed to provide only some words of them).
The `ans-report.fs' tool makes it easy for you to determine which
words from which wordset and which non-ANS words your application
uses. You simply have to include `ans-report.fs' before loading the
program you want to check. After loading your program, you can get the
report with print-ans-report. A typical use is to run this as
batch job like this:
gforth ans-report.fs myprog.fs -e "print-ans-report bye"
The output looks like this (for `compat/control.fs'):
The program uses the following words from CORE : : POSTPONE THEN ; immediate ?dup IF 0= from BLOCK-EXT : \ from FILE : (
Note that `ans-report.fs' just checks which words are used, not whether they are used in an ANS Forth conforming way!
Some words are defined in several wordsets in the
standard. `ans-report.fs' reports them for only one of the
wordsets, and not necessarily the one you expect. It depends on usage
which wordset is the right one to specify. E.g., if you only use the
compilation semantics of S", it is a Core word; if you also use
its interpretation semantics, it is a File word.
To the best of our knowledge, Gforth is an
ANS Forth System
EKEY, EKEY>CHAR, EKEY?, MS and TIME&DATE from the Facility Extensions word set
;CODE, AHEAD, ASSEMBLER, BYE, CODE, CS-PICK, CS-ROLL, STATE, [ELSE], [IF], [THEN] from the Programming-Tools Extensions word set
Gforth has the following environmental restrictions:
throw is performed after a query, Gforth does not
allways restore the input source specification in effect at the
corresponding catch.
In addition, ANS Forth systems are required to document certain implementation choices. This chapter tries to meet these requirements. In many cases it gives a way to ask the system for the information instead of providing the information directly, in particular, if the information depends on the processor, the operating system or the installation options chosen, or if they are likely to change during the maintenance of Gforth.
-23 THROW.
EMIT and non-graphic characters:
putc.
ACCEPT and EXPECT:
unsigned char; in the future we might switch to wchar_t
(Comments on that requested).
TABLEs). The
matching is performed using the C library function strncasecmp, whose
function is probably influenced by the locale. E.g., the C locale
does not know about accents and umlauts, so they are matched
case-sensitively in that locale. For portability reasons it is best to
write programs such that they work in the C locale. Then one can
use libraries written by a Polish programmer (who might use words
containing ISO Latin-2 encoded characters) and by a French programmer
(ISO Latin-1) in the same program (of course, WORDS will produce
funny results for some of the words (which ones, depends on the font you
are using)). Also, the locale you prefer may not be available in other
operating systems. Hopefully, Unicode will solve these problems one day.
word is called with the space character as a delimiter, all
white-space characters (as identified by the C macro isspace())
are delimiters. Parse, on the other hand, treats space like other
delimiters. Parse-word, which is used by the outer
interpreter (aka text interpreter) by default, treats all white-space
characters as delimiters.
cs-item-size. At the
time of this writing, an item consists of a (pointer to a) locals list
(third), an address in the code (second), and a tag for identifying the
item (TOS). The following tags are used: defstart,
live-orig, dead-orig, dest, do-dest,
scopestart.
[\]^_' are the digits with the decimal value
36-41. There is no way to input many of the larger digits.
ACCEPT and EXPECT:
ABORT":
"error and a
-2 throw is performed.
s" /counted-string" environment? drop .. Currently 255 characters
on all platforms, but this may change.
/line. Currently 255 characters.
ENVIRONMENT?, in characters:
EMIT and TYPE output to the file-id stored in the value
outfile-id (stdout by default). Gforth uses unbuffered
output when the user output device is a terminal, otherwise the output
is buffered.
s" address-units-bits" environment? drop .. 8 in all current
platforms.
MAX-N,
MAX-U, MAX-D and MAX-UD. The lower bounds for
unsigned (and positive) types is 0. The lower bound for signed types on
two's complement and one's complement machines machines can be computed
by adding 1 to the upper bound.
WORD:
PAD HERE - .. 104 characters on 32-bit machines. The buffer is
shared with the pictured numeric output string. If overwriting
PAD is acceptable, it is as large as the remaining dictionary
space, although only as much can be sensibly used as fits in a counted
string.
1 cells ..
1 chars .. 1 on all current platforms.
lp@
tib - .. It is shared with the locals stack and TIBs of files that
include the current file. You can change the amount of space for TIBs
and locals stack at Gforth startup with the command line option
-l.
PAD HERE - .. 104 characters on 32-bit machines. The buffer is
shared with WORD.
PAD:
unused pad here - - ..
TABLEs). However, as explained above under character-set
extensions, the matching for non-ASCII characters is determined by the
locale you are using. In the default C locale all non-ASCII
characters are matched case-sensitively.
ok in interpret state, compiled in compile state.
s" floored" environment? drop .. We leave
the choice to gcc (what to use for /) and to you (whether
to use fm/mod, sm/rem or simply /).
STATE when true:
-55 throw (Floating-point unidentified
fault) or -10 throw (divide by zero).
-13 throw (Undefined word).
-19 throw (Word name too long)
-9 throw (Invalid memory
address).
ABORT" or -12 THROW (Argument type
mismatch).
-14 throw (Interpreting a compile-only word). In some cases, you
get an execution token for compile-only-error (which performs a
-14 throw when executed).
-10 throw (Division by
zero); on other systems, this typically results in a -55 throw
(Floating-point unidentified fault).
-3 throw
(Stack overflow), -5 throw (Return stack overflow), or -9
throw (Invalid memory address) (depending on the platform and how you
achieved the overflow) as soon as the overflow happens. If it is not
checked, overflows typically result in mysterious illegal memory
accesses, producing -9 throw (Invalid memory address) or
-23 throw (Address alignment exception); they might also destroy
the internal data structure of ALLOCATE and friends, resulting in
various errors in these words.
allot, or indirectly
with ,, create etc.) more memory than available in the
dictionary, you get a -8 throw (Dictionary overflow). If you try
to access memory beyond the end of the dictionary, the results are
similar to stack overflows.
-14 throw (Interpreting a compile-only word).
-17 throw (Pictured numeric ouput string overflow).
PARSE cannot overflow. WORD does not check for overflow.
-10 throw (divide by zero) or -55
throw (floating point unidentified fault). convert and
>number currently overflow silently.
-4 throw (Stack
underflow) is performed. Apart from that, stacks may be checked or not,
depending on operating system, installation, and invocation. If they are
caught by a check, they typically result in -4 throw (Stack
underflow), -6 throw (Return stack underflow) or -9 throw
(Invalid memory address), depending on the platform and which stack
underflows and by how much. Note that even if the system uses checking
(through the MMU), your program may have to underflow by a significant
number of stack items to trigger the reaction (the reason for this is
that the MMU, and therefore the checking, works with a page-size
granularity). If there is no checking, the symptoms resulting from an
underflow are similar to those from an overflow. Unbalanced return
stack errors can result in a variety of symptoms, including -9 throw
(Invalid memory address) and Illegal Instruction (typically -260
throw).
Create and its descendants perform a -16 throw (Attempt to
use zero-length string as a name). Words like ' probably will not
find what they search. Note that it is possible to create zero-length
names with nextname (should it not?).
>IN greater than input buffer:
RECURSE appears after DOES>:
RESTORE-INPUT:
-12 THROW. Note that, once an input file is closed (e.g., because
the end of the file was reached), its source-id may be
reused. Therefore, restoring an input source specification referencing a
closed file may lead to unpredictable results instead of a -12
THROW.
In the future, Gforth may be able to restore input source specifications
from other than the current input source.
allot is not checked. This typically results in
memory access faults or execution of illegal instructions.
-23 throw (Address
alignment exception). Under Linux-Intel on a 486 or later processor with
alignment turned on, incorrect alignment results in a -9 throw
(Invalid memory address). There are reportedly some processors with
alignment restrictions that do not report violations.
,, C,:
PICK and ROLL):
IMMEDIATE):
abort" last word was headerless".
VALUE used by TO:
-32 throw (Invalid name argument) (unless name is a local or was
defined by CONSTANT; in the latter case it just changes the constant).
', POSTPONE, ['], [COMPILE]):
-13 throw (Undefined word)
DO, ?DO, WITHIN):
POSTPONE or [COMPILE] applied to TO:
: X POSTPONE TO ; IMMEDIATE. X performs the
compilation semantics of TO.
WORD:
LSHIFT, RSHIFT):
CREATE:
>BODY produces the PFA of the word no matter how it was defined.
DOES> changes the execution semantics of the last defined word no
matter how it was defined. E.g., CONSTANT DOES> is equivalent to
CREATE , DOES>.
<# and #>:
PAD:
UNUSED . gives the remaining dictionary space. The total
dictionary space can be specified with the -m switch
(see section Invoking Gforth) when Gforth starts up.
s" RETURN-STACK-CELLS" environment? drop .. You can specify it at
startup time with the -r switch (see section Invoking Gforth).
s" STACK-CELLS" environment? drop .. You can specify it at
startup time with the -d switch (see section Invoking Gforth).
here forthstart - . after startup. At the time of this
writing, this gives 80080 (bytes) on a 32-bit system.
LIST:
\:
throw of some OS-derived value (between
-512 and -2048). If the blocks file was just not long enough, blanks are
supplied for the missing portion.
throw of some OS-derived value (between
-512 and -2048).
-35 throw (Invalid block number)
BLK:
BLK happens when interpreting
non-block input, the system will get quite confused when the block ends.
UPDATE:
UPDATE has no effect.
D>S:
THROW-codes used in the system:
errno. One side effect of this mapping is that
undefined OS errors produce a message with a strange number; e.g.,
-1000 THROW results in Unknown error 488 on my system.
EKEY):
k-left, k-right,
k-up, k-down, k-home, k-end, k1,
k2, k3, k4, k5, k6, k7,
k8, k9, k10, k11, k12.
MS, the time is specified in
microseconds. How well the OS and the hardware implement this, is
another question.
MS:
AT-XY can't be performed on user output device:
R/O, R/W and BIN work as you would
expect. W/O translates into the C file opening mode w (or
wb): The file is cleared, if it exists, and created, if it does
not (with both open-file and create-file). Under Unix
create-file creates a file with 666 permissions modified by your
umask.
FILE-STATUS:
FILE-STATUS returns the most powerful file access mode allowed
for the file: Either R/O, W/O or R/W. If the file
cannot be accessed, R/O BIN is returned. BIN is applicable
along with the returned mode.
/line. Currently 255.
USE.
S":
S":
/line. currently 255.
REPOSITION-FILE is performed as usual: Afterwards,
FILE-POSITION returns the value given to REPOSITION-FILE.
INCLUDE-FILE):
INCLUDE-FILE, INCLUDED):
INCLUDED):
open-file is thrown.
source-id when blk is non-zero:
source-id performs its function. Typically it will give the id of
the source which loaded the block. (Better ideas?)
double type of C.
REPRESENT when float is out of range:
REPRESENT is implemented using the C library
function ecvt() and inherits its behaviour in this respect.
s" FLOATING-STACK" environment? drop . gives the total size of
the floating-point stack (in floats). You can specify this on startup
with the command-line option -f (see section Invoking Gforth).
1 floats.
df@ or df! used with an address that is not double-float aligned:
-23 THROW like other
alignment violations.
f@ or f! used with an address that is not float aligned:
-23 THROW like other
alignment violations.
-43 throw (floating point
overflow), -54 throw (floating point underflow), -41 throw
(floating point inexact result), -55 THROW (Floating-point
unidentified fault), or can produce a special value representing, e.g.,
Infinity.
sf@ or sf! used with an address that is not single-float aligned:
base is not decimal (REPRESENT, F., FE., FS.):
FATAN2):
FATAN2 is implemented using the C library
function atan2().
FTAN on an argument r1 where cos(r1) is zero:
D>F:
-42 throw
(floating point divide by zero) or -55 throw (Floating-point
unidentified fault).
DF!, DF@, SF!, SF@):
FACOSH):
FLNP1):
FLN, FLOG):
FASINH, FSQRT):
fsqrt this typically gives a NaN, for
fasinh some platforms produce a NaN, others a number (bug in the
C library?).
FACOS, FASIN, FATANH):
F>D:
f., fe., fs.):
Precision characters of the numeric output area are used. If
precision is too high, these words will smash the data or code
close to here.
s" #locals" environment? drop .. Currently 15. This is a lower
bound, e.g., on a 32-bit machine there can be 41 locals of up to 8
characters. The number of locals in a definition is bounded by the size
of locals-buffer, which contains the names of the locals.
-14 throw somewhere
(Interpreting a compile-only word). If you perform the compilation
semantics, the locals access will be compiled (irrespective of state).
VALUE or (LOCAL) (TO):
-32 throw (Invalid name argument)
;CODE and CODE:
END-CODE
;CODE and CODE:
ASSEMBLER vocabulary is pushed on the search order stack, and
the input is processed by the text interpreter, (starting) in interpret
state.
EDITOR and ASSEMBLER:
SEE:
see is the executable code used by the inner
interpreter. The current see tries to output Forth source code
(and on some platforms, assembly code for primitives) as well as
possible.
FORGET):
CS-PICK, CS-ROLL):
abort" with a descriptive error
message (may change into a -22 throw (Control structure mismatch)
in the future). You may also get a memory access error. If you are
unlucky, this ambiguous condition is not caught.
FORGET):
CREATE:
;CODE behaves like DOES> in this respect, i.e., it changes
the execution semantics of the last defined word no matter how it was
defined.
POSTPONE applied to [IF]:
: X POSTPONE [IF] ; IMMEDIATE. X is
equivalent to [IF].
[ELSE] or [THEN]:
FORGET):
s" wordlists" environment? drop .. Currently 16.
root root.
immediate) or the code field (e.g., when executing DOES>)
are applied to the latest defined word (as reported by latest or
latestxt), if possible, irrespective of the compilation word list.
previous):
abort" Vocstack empty".
also):
abort" Vocstack full".
As you read through the rest of this manual, you will see documentation for Standard words, and documentation for some appealing Gforth extensions. You might ask yourself the question: "Should I restrict myself to the standard, or should I use the extensions?"
The answer depends on the goals you have for the program you are working on:
If restricting the program to Gforth is ok, then there is no reason not to use extensions. It is still a good idea to keep to the standard where it is easy, in case you want to reuse these parts in another program that you want to be portable.
If you want to be able to port the program to other Forth systems, there are the following points to consider:
In order to perform these consideratios, you need to know what's standard and what's not. This manual generally states if something is non-standard, but the authoritative source is the standard document. Appendix A of the Standard (Rationale) provides a valuable insight into the thought processes of the technical committee.
Note also that portability between Forth systems is not the only portability issue; there is also the issue of portability between different platforms (processor/OS combinations).
This chapter has yet to be written. It will contain information, on which internal structures you can rely.
This is not yet implemented.
Several people like to use Forth as scripting language for applications that are otherwise written in C, C++, or some other language.
The Forth system ATLAST provides facilities for embedding it into applications; unfortunately it has several disadvantages: most importantly, it is not based on ANS Forth, and it is apparently dead (i.e., not developed further and not supported). The facilities provided by Gforth in this area are inspired by ATLAST's facilities, so making the switch should not be hard.
We also tried to design the interface such that it can easily be implemented by other Forth systems, so that we may one day arrive at a standardized interface. Such a standard interface would allow you to replace the Forth system without having to rewrite C code.
You embed the Gforth interpreter by linking with the library
libgforth.a (give the compiler the option -lgforth). All
global symbols in this library that belong to the interface, have the
prefix forth_. (Global symbols that are used internally have the
prefix gforth_).
You can include the declarations of Forth types and the functions and
variables of the interface with #include <forth.h>.
Types.
Variables.
Data and FP Stack pointer. Area sizes.
functions.
forth_init(imagefile) forth_evaluate(string) exceptions? forth_goto(address) (or forth_execute(xt)?) forth_continue() (a corountining mechanism)
Adding primitives.
No checking.
Signals?
Accessing the Stacks
Gforth comes with `gforth.el', an improved version of `forth.el' by Goran Rydqvist (included in the TILE package). The improvements are:
info-lookup feature for looking up the
documentation of a word.
To get a basic description of these features, enter Forth mode and type C-h m.
In addition, Gforth supports Emacs quite well: The source code locations
given in error messages, debugging output (from ~~) and failed
assertion messages are in the right format for Emacs' compilation mode
(see section `Running Compilations under Emacs' in Emacs Manual) so the source location corresponding to an error or other
message is only a few keystrokes away (C-x ` for the next error,
C-c C-c for the error under the cursor).
Moreover, for words documented in this manual, you can look up the
glossary entry quickly by using C-h TAB
(info-lookup-symbol, see section `Documentation Commands' in Emacs Manual). This feature requires Emacs 20.3 or
later and does not work for words containing :.
To make the features from `gforth.el' available in Emacs, add the following lines to your `.emacs' file:
(autoload 'forth-mode "gforth.el")
(setq auto-mode-alist (cons '("\\.fs\\'" . forth-mode)
auto-mode-alist))
(autoload 'forth-block-mode "gforth.el")
(setq auto-mode-alist (cons '("\\.fb\\'" . forth-block-mode)
auto-mode-alist))
(add-hook 'forth-mode-hook (function (lambda ()
;; customize variables here:
(setq forth-indent-level 4)
(setq forth-minor-indent-level 2)
(setq forth-hilight-level 3)
;;; ...
)))
If you require `etags.fs', a new `TAGS' file will be
produced (see section `Tags Tables' in Emacs Manual) that
contains the definitions of all words defined afterwards. You can then
find the source for a word using M-.. Note that Emacs can use
several tags files at the same time (e.g., one for the Gforth sources
and one for your program, see section `Selecting a Tags Table' in Emacs Manual). The TAGS file for the preloaded words is
`$(datadir)/gforth/$(VERSION)/TAGS' (e.g.,
`/usr/local/share/gforth/0.2.0/TAGS'). To get the best behaviour
with `etags.fs', you should avoid putting definitions both before
and after require etc., otherwise you will see the same file
visited several times by commands like tags-search.
`gforth.el' comes with a custom source hilighting engine. When
you open a file in forth-mode, it will be completely parsed,
assigning faces to keywords, comments, strings etc. While you edit
the file, modified regions get parsed and updated on-the-fly.
Use the variable `forth-hilight-level' to change the level of decoration from 0 (no hilighting at all) to 3 (the default). Even if you set the hilighting level to 0, the parser will still work in the background, collecting information about whether regions of text are "compiled" or "interpreted". Those information are required for auto-indentation to work properly. Set `forth-disable-parser' to non-nil if your computer is too slow to handle parsing. This will have an impact on the smartness of the auto-indentation engine, though.
Sometimes Forth sources define new features that should be hilighted,
new control structures, defining-words etc. You can use the variable
`forth-custom-words' to make forth-mode hilight additional
words and constructs. See the docstring of `forth-words' for details
(in Emacs, type C-h v forth-words).
`forth-custom-words' is meant to be customized in your `.emacs' file. To customize hilighing in a file-specific manner, set `forth-local-words' in a local-variables section at the end of your source file (see section `Variables' in Emacs Manual).
Example:
0 [IF]
Local Variables:
forth-local-words:
((("t:") definition-starter (font-lock-keyword-face . 1)
"[ \t\n]" t name (font-lock-function-name-face . 3))
((";t") definition-ender (font-lock-keyword-face . 1)))
End:
[THEN]
forth-mode automatically tries to indent lines in a smart way,
whenever you type TAB or break a line with C-m.
Simple customization can be achieved by setting `forth-indent-level' and `forth-minor-indent-level' in your `.emacs' file. For historical reasons `gforth.el' indents per default by multiples of 4 columns. To use the more traditional 3-column indentation, add the following lines to your `.emacs':
(add-hook 'forth-mode-hook (function (lambda () ;; customize variables here: (setq forth-indent-level 3) (setq forth-minor-indent-level 1) )))
If you want indentation to recognize non-default words, customize it by setting `forth-custom-indent-words' in your `.emacs'. See the docstring of `forth-indent-words' for details (in Emacs, type C-h v forth-indent-words).
To customize indentation in a file-specific manner, set `forth-local-indent-words' in a local-variables section at the end of your source file (see section `Local Variables in Files' in Emacs Manual).
Example:
0 [IF]
Local Variables:
forth-local-indent-words:
((("t:") (0 . 2) (0 . 2))
((";t") (-2 . 0) (0 . -2)))
End:
[THEN]
forth-mode Autodetects blocks files by checking whether the
length of the first line exceeds 1023 characters. It then tries to
convert the file into normal text format. When you save the file, it
will be written to disk as normal stream-source file.
If you want to write blocks files, use forth-blocks-mode. It
inherits all the features from forth-mode, plus some additions:
There are some restrictions you should be aware of. When you open a blocks file that contains tabulator or newline characters, these characters will be translated into spaces when the file is written back to disk. If tabs or newlines are encountered during blocks file reading, an error is output to the echo area. So have a look at the `*Messages*' buffer, when Emacs' bell rings during reading.
Please consult the docstring of forth-blocks-mode for more
information by typing C-h v forth-blocks-mode).
An image file is a file containing an image of the Forth dictionary,
i.e., compiled Forth code and data residing in the dictionary. By
convention, we use the extension .fi for image files.
An image created with gforthmi (see section `gforthmi') or
savesystem (see section Non-Relocatable Image Files) includes the
original image; i.e., according to copyright law it is a derived work of
the original image.
Since Gforth is distributed under the GNU GPL, the newly created image falls under the GNU GPL, too. In particular, this means that if you distribute the image, you have to make all of the sources for the image available, including those you wrote. For details see section GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE.
If you create an image with cross (see section `cross.fs'), the image
contains only code compiled from the sources you gave it; if none of
these sources is under the GPL, the terms discussed above do not apply
to the image. However, if your image needs an engine (a gforth binary)
that is under the GPL, you should make sure that you distribute both in
a way that is at most a mere aggregation, if you don't want the
terms of the GPL to apply to the image.
Gforth consists not only of primitives (in the engine), but also of definitions written in Forth. Since the Forth compiler itself belongs to those definitions, it is not possible to start the system with the engine and the Forth source alone. Therefore we provide the Forth code as an image file in nearly executable form. When Gforth starts up, a C routine loads the image file into memory, optionally relocates the addresses, then sets up the memory (stacks etc.) according to information in the image file, and (finally) starts executing Forth code.
The image file variants represent different compromises between the goals of making it easy to generate image files and making them portable.
Win32Forth 3.4 and Mitch Bradley's cforth use relocation at
run-time. This avoids many of the complications discussed below (image
files are data relocatable without further ado), but costs performance
(one addition per memory access).
By contrast, the Gforth loader performs relocation at image load time. The loader also has to replace tokens that represent primitive calls with the appropriate code-field addresses (or code addresses in the case of direct threading).
There are three kinds of image files, with different degrees of relocatability: non-relocatable, data-relocatable, and fully relocatable image files.
These image file variants have several restrictions in common; they are caused by the design of the image file loader:
ALLOCATEd memory chunks (and pointers to
them). The contents of the stacks are not represented, either.
tables or wordlists for this
purpose, you will have no problem, because the hash tables are
recomputed automatically when the system is started. If you use your own
hash tables, you will have to do something similar.
XORed addresses. You could represent such lists as singly-linked
in the image file, and restore the doubly-linked representation on
startup.(37)
docol: cannot be
represented in the image file (because their tokens would be replaced by
machine code in direct threaded implementations). As a workaround,
compute these addresses at run-time with >code-address from the
executions tokens of appropriate words (see the definitions of
docol: and friends in `kernel/getdoers.fs').
CODE words that contain
absolute addresses in this form in a relocatable image file. Workarounds
are representing the address in some relative form (e.g., relative to
the CFA, which is present in some register), or loading the address from
a place where it is stored in a non-mangled form.
These files are simple memory dumps of the dictionary. They are specific to the executable (i.e., `gforth' file) they were created with. What's worse, they are specific to the place on which the dictionary resided when the image was created. Now, there is no guarantee that the dictionary will reside at the same place the next time you start Gforth, so there's no guarantee that a non-relocatable image will work the next time (Gforth will complain instead of crashing, though).
You can create a non-relocatable image file with
savesystem "name" -- gforth ``savesystem''
These files contain relocatable data addresses, but fixed code addresses (instead of tokens). They are specific to the executable (i.e., `gforth' file) they were created with. For direct threading on some architectures (e.g., the i386), data-relocatable images do not work. You get a data-relocatable image, if you use `gforthmi' with a Gforth binary that is not doubly indirect threaded (see section Fully Relocatable Image Files).
These image files have relocatable data addresses, and tokens for code addresses. They can be used with different binaries (e.g., with and without debugging) on the same machine, and even across machines with the same data formats (byte order, cell size, floating point format). However, they are usually specific to the version of Gforth they were created with. The files `gforth.fi' and `kernl*.fi' are fully relocatable.
There are two ways to create a fully relocatable image file:
You will usually use `gforthmi'. If you want to create an
image file that contains everything you would load by invoking
Gforth with gforth options, you simply say:
gforthmi file options
E.g., if you want to create an image `asm.fi' that has the file `asm.fs' loaded in addition to the usual stuff, you could do it like this:
gforthmi asm.fi asm.fs
`gforthmi' is implemented as a sh script and works like this: It produces two non-relocatable images for different addresses and then compares them. Its output reflects this: first you see the output (if any) of the two Gforth invocations that produce the non-relocatable image files, then you see the output of the comparing program: It displays the offset used for data addresses and the offset used for code addresses; moreover, for each cell that cannot be represented correctly in the image files, it displays a line like this:
78DC BFFFFA50 BFFFFA40
This means that at offset $78dc from forthstart, one input image
contains $bffffa50, and the other contains $bffffa40. Since these cells
cannot be represented correctly in the output image, you should examine
these places in the dictionary and verify that these cells are dead
(i.e., not read before they are written).
If you insert the option --application in front of the image file
name, you will get an image that uses the --appl-image option
instead of the --image-file option (see section Invoking Gforth). When you execute such an image on Unix (by typing the image
name as command), the Gforth engine will pass all options to the image
instead of trying to interpret them as engine options.
If you type `gforthmi' with no arguments, it prints some usage instructions.
There are a few wrinkles: After processing the passed options, the
words savesystem and bye must be visible. A special doubly
indirect threaded version of the `gforth' executable is used for
creating the non-relocatable images; you can pass the exact filename of
this executable through the environment variable GFORTHD
(default: `gforth-ditc'); if you pass a version that is not doubly
indirect threaded, you will not get a fully relocatable image, but a
data-relocatable image (because there is no code address offset). The
normal `gforth' executable is used for creating the relocatable
image; you can pass the exact filename of this executable through the
environment variable GFORTH.
You can also use cross, a batch compiler that accepts a Forth-like
programming language (see section Cross Compiler).
cross allows you to create image files for machines with
different data sizes and data formats than the one used for generating
the image file. You can also use it to create an application image that
does not contain a Forth compiler. These features are bought with
restrictions and inconveniences in programming. E.g., addresses have to
be stored in memory with special words (A!, A,, etc.) in
order to make the code relocatable.
If you invoke Gforth with a command line flag for the size
(see section Invoking Gforth), the size you specify is stored in the
dictionary. If you save the dictionary with savesystem or create
an image with `gforthmi', this size will become the default
for the resulting image file. E.g., the following will create a
fully relocatable version of `gforth.fi' with a 1MB dictionary:
gforthmi gforth.fi -m 1M
In other words, if you want to set the default size for the dictionary and the stacks of an image, just invoke `gforthmi' with the appropriate options when creating the image.
Note: For cache-friendly behaviour (i.e., good performance), you should make the sizes of the stacks modulo, say, 2K, somewhat different. E.g., the default stack sizes are: data: 16k (mod 2k=0); fp: 15.5k (mod 2k=1.5k); return: 15k(mod 2k=1k); locals: 14.5k (mod 2k=0.5k).
You can invoke Gforth with an image file image instead of the
default `gforth.fi' with the -i flag (see section Invoking Gforth):
gforth -i image
If your operating system supports starting scripts with a line of the
form #! ..., you just have to type the image file name to start
Gforth with this image file (note that the file extension .fi is
just a convention). I.e., to run Gforth with the image file image,
you can just type image instead of gforth -i image.
This works because every .fi file starts with a line of this
format:
#! /usr/local/bin/gforth-0.4.0 -i
The file and pathname for the Gforth engine specified on this line is
the specific Gforth executable that it was built against; i.e. the value
of the environment variable GFORTH at the time that
`gforthmi' was executed.
You can make use of the same shell capability to make a Forth source file into an executable. For example, if you place this text in a file:
#! /usr/local/bin/gforth ." Hello, world" CR bye
and then make the file executable (chmod +x in Unix), you can run it
directly from the command line. The sequence #! is used in two
ways; firstly, it is recognised as a "magic sequence" by the operating
system(38) secondly it is treated as a comment character by
Gforth. Because of the second usage, a space is required between
#! and the path to the executable (moreover, some Unixes
require the sequence #! /).
The disadvantage of this latter technique, compared with using `gforthmi', is that it is slightly slower; the Forth source code is compiled on-the-fly, each time the program is invoked.
#! -- gforth ``hash-bang''
An alias for \
You can add your own initialization to the startup sequence through the
deferred word 'cold. 'cold is invoked just before the
image-specific command line processing (i.e., loading files and
evaluating (-e) strings) starts.
A sequence for adding your initialization usually looks like this:
:noname
Defers 'cold \ do other initialization stuff (e.g., rehashing wordlists)
... \ your stuff
; IS 'cold
You can make a turnkey image by letting 'cold execute a word
(your turnkey application) that never returns; instead, it exits Gforth
via bye or throw.
You can access the (image-specific) command-line arguments through the
variables argc and argv. arg provides convenient
access to argv.
If 'cold exits normally, Gforth processes the command-line
arguments as files to be loaded and strings to be evaluated. Therefore,
'cold should remove the arguments it has used in this case.
'cold -- gforth ``tick-cold''
argc -- addr gforth ``argc''
Variable -- the number of command-line arguments (including the command name).
argv -- addr gforth ``argv''
Variable -- a pointer to a vector of pointers to the command-line
arguments (including the command-name). Each argument is
represented as a C-style string.
arg n -- addr count gforth ``arg''
Return the string for the nth command-line argument.
Reading this chapter is not necessary for programming with Gforth. It may be helpful for finding your way in the Gforth sources.
The ideas in this section have also been published in the following papers: Bernd Paysan, ANS fig/GNU/??? Forth (in German), Forth-Tagung '93; M. Anton Ertl, A Portable Forth Engine, EuroForth '93; M. Anton Ertl, Threaded code variations and optimizations (extended version), Forth-Tagung '02.
An important goal of the Gforth Project is availability across a wide range of personal machines. fig-Forth, and, to a lesser extent, F83, achieved this goal by manually coding the engine in assembly language for several then-popular processors. This approach is very labor-intensive and the results are short-lived due to progress in computer architecture.
Others have avoided this problem by coding in C, e.g., Mitch Bradley (cforth), Mikael Patel (TILE) and Dirk Zoller (pfe). This approach is particularly popular for UNIX-based Forths due to the large variety of architectures of UNIX machines. Unfortunately an implementation in C does not mix well with the goals of efficiency and with using traditional techniques: Indirect or direct threading cannot be expressed in C, and switch threading, the fastest technique available in C, is significantly slower. Another problem with C is that it is very cumbersome to express double integer arithmetic.
Fortunately, there is a portable language that does not have these
limitations: GNU C, the version of C processed by the GNU C compiler
(see section `Extensions to the C Language Family' in GNU C Manual). Its labels as values feature (see section `Labels as Values' in GNU C Manual) makes direct and indirect
threading possible, its long long type (see section `Double-Word Integers' in GNU C Manual) corresponds to Forth's
double numbers on many systems. GNU C is freely available on all
important (and many unimportant) UNIX machines, VMS, 80386s running
MS-DOS, the Amiga, and the Atari ST, so a Forth written in GNU C can run
on all these machines.
Writing in a portable language has the reputation of producing code that is slower than assembly. For our Forth engine we repeatedly looked at the code produced by the compiler and eliminated most compiler-induced inefficiencies by appropriate changes in the source code.
However, register allocation cannot be portably influenced by the
programmer, leading to some inefficiencies on register-starved
machines. We use explicit register declarations (see section `Variables in Specified Registers' in GNU C Manual) to
improve the speed on some machines. They are turned on by using the
configuration flag --enable-force-reg (gcc switch
-DFORCE_REG). Unfortunately, this feature not only depends on the
machine, but also on the compiler version: On some machines some
compiler versions produce incorrect code when certain explicit register
declarations are used. So by default -DFORCE_REG is not used.
GNU C's labels as values extension (available since gcc-2.0,
see section `Labels as Values' in GNU C Manual)
makes it possible to take the address of label by writing
&&label. This address can then be used in a statement like
goto *address. I.e., goto *&&x is the same as
goto x.
With this feature an indirect threaded NEXT looks like:
cfa = *ip++; ca = *cfa; goto *ca;
For those unfamiliar with the names: ip is the Forth instruction
pointer; the cfa (code-field address) corresponds to ANS Forths
execution token and points to the code field of the next word to be
executed; The ca (code address) fetched from there points to some
executable code, e.g., a primitive or the colon definition handler
docol.
Direct threading is even simpler:
ca = *ip++; goto *ca;
Of course we have packaged the whole thing neatly in macros called
NEXT and NEXT1 (the part of NEXT after fetching the cfa).
There is a little complication: Pipelined and superscalar processors,
i.e., RISC and some modern CISC machines can process independent
instructions while waiting for the results of an instruction. The
compiler usually reorders (schedules) the instructions in a way that
achieves good usage of these delay slots. However, on our first tries
the compiler did not do well on scheduling primitives. E.g., for
+ implemented as
n=sp[0]+sp[1]; sp++; sp[0]=n; NEXT;
the NEXT comes strictly after the other code, i.e., there is
nearly no scheduling. After a little thought the problem becomes clear:
The compiler cannot know that sp and ip point to different
addresses (and the version of gcc we used would not know it even
if it was possible), so it could not move the load of the cfa above the
store to the TOS. Indeed the pointers could be the same, if code on or
very near the top of stack were executed. In the interest of speed we
chose to forbid this probably unused "feature" and helped the compiler
in scheduling: NEXT is divided into several parts:
NEXT_P0, NEXT_P1 and NEXT_P2). + now looks
like:
NEXT_P0; n=sp[0]+sp[1]; sp++; NEXT_P1; sp[0]=n; NEXT_P2;
There are various schemes that distribute the different operations of NEXT between these parts in several ways; in general, different schemes perform best on different processors. We use a scheme for most architectures that performs well for most processors of this architecture; in the future we may switch to benchmarking and chosing the scheme on installation time.
Threaded forth code consists of references to primitives (simple machine
code routines like +) and to non-primitives (e.g., colon
definitions, variables, constants); for a specific class of
non-primitives (e.g., variables) there is one code routine (e.g.,
dovar), but each variable needs a separate reference to its data.
Traditionally Forth has been implemented as indirect threaded code, because this allows to use only one cell to reference a non-primitive (basically you point to the data, and find the code address there).
However, threaded code in Gforth (since 0.6.0) uses two cells for
non-primitives, one for the code address, and one for the data address;
the data pointer is an immediate argument for the virtual machine
instruction represented by the code address. We call this
primitive-centric threaded code, because all code addresses point
to simple primitives. E.g., for a variable, the code address is for
lit (also used for integer literals like 99).
Primitive-centric threaded code allows us to use (faster) direct threading as dispatch method, completely portably (direct threaded code in Gforth before 0.6.0 required architecture-specific code). It also eliminates the performance problems related to I-cache consistency that 386 implementations have with direct threaded code, and allows additional optimizations.
There is a catch, however: the xt parameter of execute can
occupy only one cell, so how do we pass non-primitives with their code
and data addresses to them? Our answer is to use indirect
threaded dispatch for execute and other words that use a
single-cell xt. So, normal threaded code in colon definitions uses
direct threading, and execute and similar words, which dispatch
to xts on the data stack, use indirect threaded code. We call this
hybrid direct/indirect threaded code.
The engines @command{gforth} and @command{gforth-fast} use hybrid
direct/indirect threaded code. This means that with these engines you
cannot use , to compile an xt. Instead, you have to use
compile,.
If you want to compile xts with ,, use @command{gforth-itc}.
This engine uses plain old indirect threaded code. It still compiles in
a primitive-centric style, so you cannot use compile, instead of
, (e.g., for producing tables of xts with ] word1 word2
... [). If you want to do that, you have to use @command{gforth-itc}
and execute ' , is compile,. Your program can check if it is
running on a hybrid direct/indirect threaded engine or a pure indirect
threaded engine with threading-method (see section Threading Words).
The engines @command{gforth} and @command{gforth-fast} use another optimization: Dynamic superinstructions with replication. As an example, consider the following colon definition:
: squared ( n1 -- n2 ) dup * ;
Gforth compiles this into the threaded code sequence
dup * ;s
In normal direct threaded code there is a code address occupying one cell for each of these primitives. Each code address points to a machine code routine, and the interpreter jumps to this machine code in order to execute the primitive. The routines for these three primitives are (in @command{gforth-fast} on the 386):
Code dup ( $804B950 ) add esi , # -4 \ $83 $C6 $FC ( $804B953 ) add ebx , # 4 \ $83 $C3 $4 ( $804B956 ) mov dword ptr 4 [esi] , ecx \ $89 $4E $4 ( $804B959 ) jmp dword ptr FC [ebx] \ $FF $63 $FC end-code Code * ( $804ACC4 ) mov eax , dword ptr 4 [esi] \ $8B $46 $4 ( $804ACC7 ) add esi , # 4 \ $83 $C6 $4 ( $804ACCA ) add ebx , # 4 \ $83 $C3 $4 ( $804ACCD ) imul ecx , eax \ $F $AF $C8 ( $804ACD0 ) jmp dword ptr FC [ebx] \ $FF $63 $FC end-code Code ;s ( $804A693 ) mov eax , dword ptr [edi] \ $8B $7 ( $804A695 ) add edi , # 4 \ $83 $C7 $4 ( $804A698 ) lea ebx , dword ptr 4 [eax] \ $8D $58 $4 ( $804A69B ) jmp dword ptr FC [ebx] \ $FF $63 $FC end-code
With dynamic superinstructions and replication the compiler does not just lay down the threaded code, but also copies the machine code fragments, usually without the jump at the end.
( $4057D27D ) add esi , # -4 \ $83 $C6 $FC ( $4057D280 ) add ebx , # 4 \ $83 $C3 $4 ( $4057D283 ) mov dword ptr 4 [esi] , ecx \ $89 $4E $4 ( $4057D286 ) mov eax , dword ptr 4 [esi] \ $8B $46 $4 ( $4057D289 ) add esi , # 4 \ $83 $C6 $4 ( $4057D28C ) add ebx , # 4 \ $83 $C3 $4 ( $4057D28F ) imul ecx , eax \ $F $AF $C8 ( $4057D292 ) mov eax , dword ptr [edi] \ $8B $7 ( $4057D294 ) add edi , # 4 \ $83 $C7 $4 ( $4057D297 ) lea ebx , dword ptr 4 [eax] \ $8D $58 $4 ( $4057D29A ) jmp dword ptr FC [ebx] \ $FF $63 $FC
Only when a threaded-code control-flow change happens (e.g., in
;s), the jump is appended. This optimization eliminates many of
these jumps and makes the rest much more predictable. The speedup
depends on the processor and the application; on the Athlon and Pentium
III this optimization typically produces a speedup by a factor of 2.
The code addresses in the direct-threaded code are set to point to the appropriate points in the copied machine code, in this example like this:
primitive code address dup $4057D27D * $4057D286 ;s $4057D292
Thus there can be threaded-code jumps to any place in this piece of code. This also simplifies decompilation quite a bit.
You can disable this optimization with @option{--no-dynamic}. You can use the copying without eliminating the jumps (i.e., dynamic replication, but without superinstructions) with @option{--no-super}; this gives the branch prediction benefit alone; the effect on performance depends on the CPU; on the Athlon and Pentium III the speedup is a little less than for dynamic superinstructions with replication.
One use of these options is if you want to patch the threaded code. With superinstructions, many of the dispatch jumps are eliminated, so patching often has no effect. These options preserve all the dispatch jumps.
On some machines dynamic superinstructions are disabled by default, because it is unsafe on these machines. However, if you feel adventurous, you can enable it with @option{--dynamic}.
One of the most complex parts of a Forth engine is dodoes, i.e.,
the chunk of code executed by every word defined by a
CREATE...DOES> pair; actually with primitive-centric code,
this is only needed if the xt of the word is executed. The main
problem here is: How to find the Forth code to be executed, i.e. the
code after the DOES> (the DOES>-code)? There are two
solutions:
In fig-Forth the code field points directly to the dodoes and the
DOES>-code address is stored in the cell after the code address
(i.e. at CFA cell+). It may seem that this solution is
illegal in the Forth-79 and all later standards, because in fig-Forth
this address lies in the body (which is illegal in these
standards). However, by making the code field larger for all words this
solution becomes legal again. We use this approach. Leaving a cell
unused in most words is a bit wasteful, but on the machines we are
targeting this is hardly a problem.
Since the primitives are implemented in a portable language, there is no longer any need to minimize the number of primitives. On the contrary, having many primitives has an advantage: speed. In order to reduce the number of errors in primitives and to make programming them easier, we provide a tool, the primitive generator (`prims2x.fs' aka Vmgen, see section `Introduction' in Vmgen), that automatically generates most (and sometimes all) of the C code for a primitive from the stack effect notation. The source for a primitive has the following form:
Forth-name ( stack-effect ) category [pronounc.] [""glossary entry""] C code [:Forth code]
The items in brackets are optional. The category and glossary fields
are there for generating the documentation, the Forth code is there
for manual implementations on machines without GNU C. E.g., the source
for the primitive + is:
+ ( n1 n2 -- n ) core plus n = n1+n2;
This looks like a specification, but in fact n = n1+n2 is C
code. Our primitive generation tool extracts a lot of information from
the stack effect notations(39): The number
of items popped from and pushed on the stack, their type, and by what
name they are referred to in the C code. It then generates a C code
prelude and postlude for each primitive. The final C code for +
looks like this:
I_plus: /* + ( n1 n2 -- n ) */ /* label, stack effect */
/* */ /* documentation */
NAME("+") /* debugging output (with -DDEBUG) */
{
DEF_CA /* definition of variable ca (indirect threading) */
Cell n1; /* definitions of variables */
Cell n2;
Cell n;
NEXT_P0; /* NEXT part 0 */
n1 = (Cell) sp[1]; /* input */
n2 = (Cell) TOS;
sp += 1; /* stack adjustment */
{
n = n1+n2; /* C code taken from the source */
}
NEXT_P1; /* NEXT part 1 */
TOS = (Cell)n; /* output */
NEXT_P2; /* NEXT part 2 */
}
This looks long and inefficient, but the GNU C compiler optimizes quite
well and produces optimal code for + on, e.g., the R3000 and the
HP RISC machines: Defining the ns does not produce any code, and
using them as intermediate storage also adds no cost.
There are also other optimizations that are not illustrated by this
example: assignments between simple variables are usually for free (copy
propagation). If one of the stack items is not used by the primitive
(e.g. in drop), the compiler eliminates the load from the stack
(dead code elimination). On the other hand, there are some things that
the compiler does not do, therefore they are performed by
`prims2x.fs': The compiler does not optimize code away that stores
a stack item to the place where it just came from (e.g., over).
While programming a primitive is usually easy, there are a few cases
where the programmer has to take the actions of the generator into
account, most notably ?dup, but also words that do not (always)
fall through to NEXT.
For more information
An important optimization for stack machine emulators, e.g., Forth
engines, is keeping one or more of the top stack items in
registers. If a word has the stack effect in1...inx --
out1...outy, keeping the top n items in registers
In particular, keeping one item in a register is never a disadvantage,
if there are enough registers. Keeping two items in registers is a
disadvantage for frequent words like ?branch, constants,
variables, literals and i. Therefore our generator only produces
code that keeps zero or one items in registers. The generated C code
covers both cases; the selection between these alternatives is made at
C-compile time using the switch -DUSE_TOS. TOS in the C
code for + is just a simple variable name in the one-item case,
otherwise it is a macro that expands into sp[0]. Note that the
GNU C compiler tries to keep simple variables like TOS in
registers, and it usually succeeds, if there are enough registers.
The primitive generator performs the TOS optimization for the
floating-point stack, too (-DUSE_FTOS). For floating-point
operations the benefit of this optimization is even larger:
floating-point operations take quite long on most processors, but can be
performed in parallel with other operations as long as their results are
not used. If the FP-TOS is kept in a register, this works. If
it is kept on the stack, i.e., in memory, the store into memory has to
wait for the result of the floating-point operation, lengthening the
execution time of the primitive considerably.
The TOS optimization makes the automatic generation of primitives a
bit more complicated. Just replacing all occurrences of sp[0] by
TOS is not sufficient. There are some special cases to
consider:
dup ( w -- w w ) the generator must not
eliminate the store to the original location of the item on the stack,
if the TOS optimization is turned on.
--
out1...outy must store the TOS to the stack at the start.
Likewise, primitives with the stack effect in1...inx --
must load the TOS from the stack at the end. But for the null stack
effect -- no stores or loads should be generated.
To see what assembly code is produced for the primitives on your machine
with your compiler and your flag settings, type make engine.s and
look at the resulting file `engine.s'. Alternatively, you can also
disassemble the code of primitives with see on some architectures.
On RISCs the Gforth engine is very close to optimal; i.e., it is usually impossible to write a significantly faster threaded-code engine.
On register-starved machines like the 386 architecture processors
improvements are possible, because gcc does not utilize the
registers as well as a human, even with explicit register declarations;
e.g., Bernd Beuster wrote a Forth system fragment in assembly language
and hand-tuned it for the 486; this system is 1.19 times faster on the
Sieve benchmark on a 486DX2/66 than Gforth compiled with
gcc-2.6.3 with -DFORCE_REG. The situation has improved
with gcc-2.95 and gforth-0.4.9; now the most important virtual machine
registers fit in real registers (and we can even afford to use the TOS
optimization), resulting in a speedup of 1.14 on the sieve over the
earlier results. And dynamic superinstructions provide another speedup
(but only around a factor 1.2 on the 486).
The potential advantage of assembly language implementations is not
necessarily realized in complete Forth systems: We compared Gforth-0.5.9
(direct threaded, compiled with gcc-2.95.1 and
-DFORCE_REG) with Win32Forth 1.2093 (newer versions are
reportedly much faster), LMI's NT Forth (Beta, May 1994) and Eforth
(with and without peephole (aka pinhole) optimization of the threaded
code); all these systems were written in assembly language. We also
compared Gforth with three systems written in C: PFE-0.9.14 (compiled
with gcc-2.6.3 with the default configuration for Linux:
-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DUSE_REGS -DUNROLL_NEXT), ThisForth
Beta (compiled with gcc-2.6.3 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer; ThisForth
employs peephole optimization of the threaded code) and TILE (compiled
with make opt). We benchmarked Gforth, PFE, ThisForth and TILE on
a 486DX2/66 under Linux. Kenneth O'Heskin kindly provided the results
for Win32Forth and NT Forth on a 486DX2/66 with similar memory
performance under Windows NT. Marcel Hendrix ported Eforth to Linux,
then extended it to run the benchmarks, added the peephole optimizer,
ran the benchmarks and reported the results.
We used four small benchmarks: the ubiquitous Sieve; bubble-sorting and matrix multiplication come from the Stanford integer benchmarks and have been translated into Forth by Martin Fraeman; we used the versions included in the TILE Forth package, but with bigger data set sizes; and a recursive Fibonacci number computation for benchmarking calling performance. The following table shows the time taken for the benchmarks scaled by the time taken by Gforth (in other words, it shows the speedup factor that Gforth achieved over the other systems).
relative Win32- NT eforth This- time Gforth Forth Forth eforth +opt PFE Forth TILE sieve 1.00 2.16 1.78 2.16 1.32 2.46 4.96 13.37 bubble 1.00 1.93 2.07 2.18 1.29 2.21 5.70 matmul 1.00 1.92 1.76 1.90 0.96 2.06 5.32 fib 1.00 2.32 2.03 1.86 1.31 2.64 4.55 6.54
You may be quite surprised by the good performance of Gforth when
compared with systems written in assembly language. One important reason
for the disappointing performance of these other systems is probably
that they are not written optimally for the 486 (e.g., they use the
lods instruction). In addition, Win32Forth uses a comfortable,
but costly method for relocating the Forth image: like cforth, it
computes the actual addresses at run time, resulting in two address
computations per NEXT (see section Image File Background).
The speedup of Gforth over PFE, ThisForth and TILE can be easily explained with the self-imposed restriction of the latter systems to standard C, which makes efficient threading impossible (however, the measured implementation of PFE uses a GNU C extension: see section `Defining Global Register Variables' in GNU C Manual). Moreover, current C compilers have a hard time optimizing other aspects of the ThisForth and the TILE source.
The performance of Gforth on 386 architecture processors varies widely
with the version of gcc used. E.g., gcc-2.5.8 failed to
allocate any of the virtual machine registers into real machine
registers by itself and would not work correctly with explicit register
declarations, giving a significantly slower engine (on a 486DX2/66
running the Sieve) than the one measured above.
Note that there have been several releases of Win32Forth since the release presented here, so the results presented above may have little predictive value for the performance of Win32Forth today (results for the current release on an i486DX2/66 are welcome).
In Translating Forth to Efficient C by M. Anton Ertl and Martin Maierhofer (presented at EuroForth '95), an indirect threaded version of Gforth is compared with Win32Forth, NT Forth, PFE, ThisForth, and several native code systems; that version of Gforth is slower on a 486 than the version used here. You can find a newer version of these measurements at http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/performance.html. You can find numbers for Gforth on various machines in `Benchres'.
The cross compiler is used to bootstrap a Forth kernel. Since Gforth is mostly written in Forth, including crucial parts like the outer interpreter and compiler, it needs compiled Forth code to get started. The cross compiler allows to create new images for other architectures, even running under another Forth system.
The cross compiler uses a language that resembles Forth, but isn't. The main difference is that you can execute Forth code after definition, while you usually can't execute the code compiled by cross, because the code you are compiling is typically for a different computer than the one you are compiling on.
The Makefile is already set up to allow you to create kernels for new
architectures with a simple make command. The generic kernels using the
GCC compiled virtual machine are created in the normal build process
with make. To create a embedded Gforth executable for e.g. the
8086 processor (running on a DOS machine), type
make kernl-8086.fi
This will use the machine description from the `arch/8086' directory to create a new kernel. A machine file may look like that:
\ Parameter for target systems 06oct92py
4 Constant cell \ cell size in bytes
2 Constant cell<< \ cell shift to bytes
5 Constant cell>bit \ cell shift to bits
8 Constant bits/char \ bits per character
8 Constant bits/byte \ bits per byte [default: 8]
8 Constant float \ bytes per float
8 Constant /maxalign \ maximum alignment in bytes
false Constant bigendian \ byte order
( true=big, false=little )
include machpc.fs \ feature list
This part is obligatory for the cross compiler itself, the feature list is used by the kernel to conditionally compile some features in and out, depending on whether the target supports these features.
There are some optional features, if you define your own primitives,
have an assembler, or need special, nonstandard preparation to make the
boot process work. asm-include includes an assembler,
prims-include includes primitives, and >boot prepares for
booting.
: asm-include ." Include assembler" cr s" arch/8086/asm.fs" included ; : prims-include ." Include primitives" cr s" arch/8086/prim.fs" included ; : >boot ." Prepare booting" cr s" ' boot >body into-forth 1+ !" evaluate ;
These words are used as sort of macro during the cross compilation in the file `kernel/main.fs'. Instead of using these macros, it would be possible -- but more complicated -- to write a new kernel project file, too.
`kernel/main.fs' expects the machine description file name on the
stack; the cross compiler itself (`cross.fs') assumes that either
mach-file leaves a counted string on the stack, or
machine-file leaves an address, count pair of the filename on the
stack.
The feature list is typically controlled using SetValue, generic
files that are used by several projects can use DefaultValue
instead. Both functions work like Value, when the value isn't
defined, but SetValue works like to if the value is
defined, and DefaultValue doesn't set anything, if the value is
defined.
\ generic mach file for pc gforth 03sep97jaw
true DefaultValue NIL \ relocating
>ENVIRON
true DefaultValue file \ controls the presence of the
\ file access wordset
true DefaultValue OS \ flag to indicate a operating system
true DefaultValue prims \ true: primitives are c-code
true DefaultValue floating \ floating point wordset is present
true DefaultValue glocals \ gforth locals are present
\ will be loaded
true DefaultValue dcomps \ double number comparisons
true DefaultValue hash \ hashing primitives are loaded/present
true DefaultValue xconds \ used together with glocals,
\ special conditionals supporting gforths'
\ local variables
true DefaultValue header \ save a header information
true DefaultValue backtrace \ enables backtrace code
false DefaultValue ec
false DefaultValue crlf
cell 2 = [IF] &32 [ELSE] &256 [THEN] KB DefaultValue kernel-size
&16 KB DefaultValue stack-size
&15 KB &512 + DefaultValue fstack-size
&15 KB DefaultValue rstack-size
&14 KB &512 + DefaultValue lstack-size
Known bugs are described in the file `BUGS' in the Gforth distribution.
If you find a bug, please submit a bug report through https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=addbug&group=gforth.
uname -a will report this information).
configure
output or `config.cache').
For a thorough guide on reporting bugs read section `How to Report Bugs' in GNU C Manual.
The Gforth project was started in mid-1992 by Bernd Paysan and Anton Ertl. The third major author was Jens Wilke. Neal Crook contributed a lot to the manual. Assemblers and disassemblers were contributed by Andrew McKewan, Christian Pirker, and Bernd Thallner. Lennart Benschop (who was one of Gforth's first users, in mid-1993) and Stuart Ramsden inspired us with their continuous feedback. Lennart Benshop contributed `glosgen.fs', while Stuart Ramsden has been working on automatic support for calling C libraries. Helpful comments also came from Paul Kleinrubatscher, Christian Pirker, Dirk Zoller, Marcel Hendrix, John Wavrik, Barrie Stott, Marc de Groot, Jorge Acerada, Bruce Hoyt, Robert Epprecht, Dennis Ruffer and David N. Williams. Since the release of Gforth-0.2.1 there were also helpful comments from many others; thank you all, sorry for not listing you here (but digging through my mailbox to extract your names is on my to-do list).
Gforth also owes a lot to the authors of the tools we used (GCC, CVS, and autoconf, among others), and to the creators of the Internet: Gforth was developed across the Internet, and its authors did not meet physically for the first 4 years of development.
Gforth descends from bigFORTH (1993) and fig-Forth. Of course, a significant part of the design of Gforth was prescribed by ANS Forth.
Bernd Paysan wrote bigFORTH, a descendent from TurboForth, an unreleased 32 bit native code version of VolksForth for the Atari ST, written mostly by Dietrich Weineck.
VolksForth was written by Klaus Schleisiek, Bernd Pennemann, Georg Rehfeld and Dietrich Weineck for the C64 (called UltraForth there) in the mid-80s and ported to the Atari ST in 1986. It descends from F83.
Henry Laxen and Mike Perry wrote F83 as a model implementation of the Forth-83 standard. !! Pedigree? When?
A team led by Bill Ragsdale implemented fig-Forth on many processors in 1979. Robert Selzer and Bill Ragsdale developed the original implementation of fig-Forth for the 6502 based on microForth.
The principal architect of microForth was Dean Sanderson. microForth was FORTH, Inc.'s first off-the-shelf product. It was developed in 1976 for the 1802, and subsequently implemented on the 8080, the 6800 and the Z80.
All earlier Forth systems were custom-made, usually by Charles Moore, who discovered (as he puts it) Forth during the late 60s. The first full Forth existed in 1971.
A part of the information in this section comes from The Evolution of Forth by Elizabeth D. Rather, Donald R. Colburn and Charles H. Moore, presented at the HOPL-II conference and preprinted in SIGPLAN Notices 28(3), 1993. You can find more historical and genealogical information about Forth there.
There is an active news group (comp.lang.forth) discussing Forth (including Gforth) and Forth-related issues. Its FAQs (frequently asked questions and their answers) contains a lot of information on Forth. You should read it before posting to comp.lang.forth.
The ANS Forth standard is most usable in its HTML form.
Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of the License in the document and put the following copyright and license notices just after the title page:
Copyright (C) year your name. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the Invariant Sections being list their titles, with the Front-Cover Texts being list, and with the Back-Cover Texts being list. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled ``GNU Free Documentation License''.
If you have no Invariant Sections, write "with no Invariant Sections" instead of saying which ones are invariant. If you have no Front-Cover Texts, write "no Front-Cover Texts" instead of "Front-Cover Texts being list"; likewise for Back-Cover Texts.
If your document contains nontrivial examples of program code, we recommend releasing these examples in parallel under your choice of free software license, such as the GNU General Public License, to permit their use in free software.
Version 2, June 1991
Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.
We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and (2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify the software.
Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original authors' reputations.
Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and modification follow.
@ifnottex TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
NO WARRANTY @ifnottex NO WARRANTY
@ifnottex END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
If you develop a new program, and you want it to be of the greatest possible use to the public, the best way to achieve this is to make it free software which everyone can redistribute and change under these terms.
To do so, attach the following notices to the program. It is safest to attach them to the start of each source file to most effectively convey the exclusion of warranty; and each file should have at least the "copyright" line and a pointer to where the full notice is found.
one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does. Copyright (C) year name of author This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
Also add information on how to contact you by electronic and paper mail.
If the program is interactive, make it output a short notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
Gnomovision version 69, Copyright (C) year name of author Gnomovision comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'. This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.
The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate parts of the General Public License. Of course, the commands you use may be called something other than `show w' and `show c'; they could even be mouse-clicks or menu items--whatever suits your program.
You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or your school, if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary. Here is a sample; alter the names:
Yoyodyne, Inc., hereby disclaims all copyright interest in the program `Gnomovision' (which makes passes at compilers) written by James Hacker. signature of Ty Coon, 1 April 1989 Ty Coon, President of Vice
This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Library General Public License instead of this License.
This index is a list of Forth words that have "glossary" entries within this manual. Each word is listed with its stack effect and wordset.
Jump to: ! - # - $ - % - ' - ( - ) - * - + - , - - - . - / - 0 - 1 - 2 - : - ; - < - = - > - ? - @ - [ - \ - ] - a - b - c - d - e - f - g - h - i - j - k - l - m - n - o - p - q - r - s - t - u - v - w - x - ~
Not all entries listed in this index are present verbatim in the text. This index also duplicates, in abbreviated form, all of the words listed in the Word Index (only the names are listed for the words here).
Jump to: ! - " - # - $ - % - & - ' - ( - ) - * - + - , - - - . - / - 0 - 1 - 2 - : - ; - < - = - > - ? - @ - [ - \ - ] - a - b - c - d - e - f - g - h - i - j - k - l - m - n - o - p - q - r - s - t - u - v - w - x - z - ~
!
", stack item type
#
#!
#>
#>>
#s
#tib
$?
%align
%alignment
%alloc
%allocate
%allot
%size
', '
'cold
(
(local)
)
*
*/
*/mod
+
+!
+DO
+load
+LOOP
+thru
,
-
-->
gforthmi option
-DO
-LOOP
-rot
-trailing
.
."
.", how it works
.(
.\"
.debugline
.id
.name
.path
.r
.s
/
/does-handler
/mod
/string
0<
0<=
0<>
0=
0>
0>=
1+
1-
1/f
2!
2*
2,
2/
2>r
2@
2Constant
2drop
2dup
2Literal
2nip
2over
2r>
2r@
2rdrop
2rot
2swap
2tuck
2Variable
:, :
:, passing data across
::, ::
:m
:noname
;
;code
;CODE ending sequence
;CODE, processing input
;CODE, name not defined via CREATE
;m
;m usage
;s
<
<#
<<#
<=
<>
<bind>
<compilation
<interpretation
<IS>
<to-inst>
=
>
>=
>body
>BODY of non-CREATEd words
>code-address
>definer
>does-code
>float
>in
>IN greater than input buffer
>l
>name
>number
>order
>r
?
?DO
?dup
?DUP-0=-IF
?DUP-IF
?LEAVE
@
@local#
[
[']
[+LOOP]
[?DO]
[]
[AGAIN]
[BEGIN]
[bind]
[bind] usage
[Char]
[COMP']
[compile]
[current]
[DO]
[ELSE]
[ENDIF]
[FOR]
[IF]
[IF] and POSTPONE
[IF], end of the input source before matching [ELSE] or [THEN]
[IFDEF]
[IFUNDEF]
[IS]
[LOOP]
[NEXT]
[parent]
[parent] usage
[REPEAT]
[THEN]
[to-inst]
[UNTIL]
[WHILE]
\
\"-parse
\, editing with Emacs
\, line length in blocks
\G
]
]L
a_, stack item type
abort
ABORT"
ABORT", exception abort sequence
abs
accept
ACCEPT, display after end of input
ACCEPT, editing
ADDRESS-UNIT-BITS
AGAIN
AHEAD
Alias
align
aligned
allocate
allot
also
also, too many word lists in search order
also-path
and
arg
argc
RESTORE-INPUT
RESTORE-INPUT
argv
asptr, asptr
assembler
ASSEMBLER, search order capability
assert(
assert-level
assert0(
assert1(
assert2(
assert3(
ASSUME-LIVE
at-xy
AT-XY can't be performed on user output device
gforth-fast
base
base is not decimal (REPRESENT, F., FE., FS.)
BEGIN
bin
bind, bind
bind usage
bind'
bl
blank
blk
BLK, altering BLK
block
block-included
block-offset
block-position
bound
bounds
break"
break:
broken-pipe-error
buffer
bye
bye during `gforthmi'
c!
C"
c,
c, stack item type
c@
c_, stack item type
case
CASE control structure
catch
catch and backtraces
catch and this
catch in m: ... ;m
cell
cell%
cell+
cells
cfalign
cfaligned
char
char%
char+
ACCEPT and EXPECT
chars
class, class, class
class usage, class usage
class->map
class-inst-size
class-inst-size discussion
class-override!
class-previous
class;
class; usage
class>order
class?
clear-path
clearstack
close-file
close-pipe
cmove
cmove>
code
CODE ending sequence
CODE, processing input
code-address!
:
common-list
COMP'
compare
compilation>
compile,
compile-lp+!
compile-only
Constant
construct
construct discussion
context
convert
count
cputime
cr
Create
CREATE and alignment
create-file
create-interpret/compile
CREATE ... DOES>
CREATE ... DOES>, applications
CREATE ... DOES>, details
CS-PICK
CS-PICK, fewer than u+1 items on the control flow-stack
CS-ROLL
CS-ROLL, fewer than u+1 items on the control flow-stack
current
current'
current-interface
current-interface discussion
d+
d, stack item type
d-
d.
d.r
d0<
d0<=
d0<>
d0=
d0>
d0>=
d2*
d2/
d<
d<=
d<>
d=
d>
d>=
d>f
D>F, d cannot be presented precisely as a float
d>s
D>S, d out of range of n
dabs
,, C,
dbg
dec.
decimal
defer
Defer
defers
definer!
defines
definitions, definitions
delete-file
depth
dest, control-flow stack item
df!
df@
df@ or df! used with an address that is not double-float aligned
df_, stack item type
dfalign
dfaligned
dfloat%
dfloat+
dfloats
dict-new
dict-new discussion
dispose
dmax
dmin
dnegate
DO
DO loops
docol:
docon:
dodefer:
dodoes routine
does-code!
does-handler!
DOES>
DOES> implementation
DOES> in a separate definition
DOES> in interpretation state
DOES>-code
does>-code
does>-handler
DOES>-parts, stack effect
DOES> of non-CREATEd words
dofield:
DONE
double%
douser:
dovar:
dpl
drop
du<
du<=
du>
du>=
dump
dup
early
edit-line
ACCEPT and EXPECT
ekey
EKEY, encoding of keyboard events
ekey>char
ekey?
ELSE
emit
EMIT and non-graphic characters
emit-file
empty-buffer
empty-buffers
end-class, end-class
end-class usage
end-class-noname
end-code
end-interface
end-interface usage
end-interface-noname
end-methods
end-struct
end-struct usage
endcase
ENDIF
endof
endscope
endtry
endwith
environment-wordlist
environment?
ENVIRONMENT? string length, maximum
erase
evaluate
exception
ABORT"
execute
execute-parsing
execute-parsing-file
EXIT
exit in m: ... ;m
exitm
exitm discussion
expect
EXPECT, display after end of input
EXPECT, editing
DF!, DF@, SF!, SF@)
f!
f! used with an address that is not float aligned
f*
f**
f+
f,
f, stack item type
f-
f.
f.rdp
f.s
f/
f0<
f0<=
f0<>
f0=
f0>
f0>=
f2*
f2/
f83name, stack item type
f<
f<=
f<>
f=
f>
f>=
f>d
F>D, integer part of float cannot be represented by d
f>l
f>str-rdp
f@
f@ used with an address that is not float aligned
f@local#
f_, stack item type
fabs
facos
FACOS, |float|>1
facosh
FACOSH, float<1
falign
faligned
falog
false
fasin
FASIN, |float|>1
fasinh
FASINH, float<0
fatan
fatan2
FATAN2, both arguments are equal to zero
fatanh
FATANH, |float|>1
fconstant
fcos
fcosh
fdepth
fdrop
fdup
fe.
fexp
fexpm1
field
field usage
field usage in class definition
file-position
file-size
file-status
FILE-STATUS, returned information
~~ output
fill
find
find-name
FLiteral
fln
FLN, float=<0
flnp1
FLNP1, float=<-1
float
float%
float+
F>D
FACOS, FASIN or FATANH
FACOSH
FASINH or FSQRT
FLN or FLOG
FLNP1
floating-stack
floats
flog
FLOG, float=<0
floor
FLOORED
flush
flush-file
flush-icache
fm/mod
fmax
fmin
fnegate
fnip
FOR
FOR loops
FORGET, deleting the compilation word list
FORGET, name can't be found
FORGET, removing a needed definition
Forth
forth-wordlist
fover
fp!
fp0
fp@
fpath
fpick
free
frot
fround
fs.
fsin
fsincos
fsinh
fsqrt
FSQRT, float<0
fswap
ftan
FTAN on an argument r1 where cos(r1) is zero
ftanh
ftuck
fvariable
f~
f~abs
f~rel
get-block-fid
get-current
get-order
getenv
gforth
GFORTH -- environment variable, GFORTH -- environment variable
gforth-ditc
gforth-fast and backtraces
gforth-fast, difference from gforth
GFORTHD -- environment variable, GFORTHD -- environment variable
GFORTHHIST -- environment variable
GFORTHPATH -- environment variable
heap-new
heap-new discussion
heap-new usage
here
hex
hex.
hold
how:
i
id.
IF
IF control structure
immediate
implementation
implementation usage
include
include search path
include, placement in files
include-file
INCLUDE-FILE, file-id is invalid
INCLUDE-FILE, I/O exception reading or closing file-id
included
INCLUDED, I/O exception reading or closing file-id
INCLUDED, named file cannot be opened
included?
init
init-asm
init-object
init-object discussion
inst-value
inst-value usage
inst-value visibility
inst-var
inst-var implementation
inst-var usage
inst-var visibility
interface
interface usage
interpret/compile:
interpretation>
' etc.
TO, Invalid name argument, TO
invert
IS
is
j
k
key
key?
EKEY
laddr#
latest
latestxt
LEAVE
\
link
list
LIST display format
list-size
Literal
load
LOOP
lp!, lp!
lp+!#
lp0
lp@
lshift
LSHIFT, large shift counts
m*
m*/
m+
m:
m: usage
marker
max
maxalign
maxaligned
ENVIRONMENT?, in characters
method, method, method
method usage
methods
methods...end-methods
min
mod
IMMEDIATE)
move
ms
MS, repeatability to be expected
n, stack item type
naligned
name
VALUE or (LOCAL) used by TO
VALUE used by TO
', POSTPONE, ['], [COMPILE])
name>comp
name>int
name>string
name?int
needs
negate
new, new
new[]
NEXT
NEXT, direct threaded
NEXT, indirect threaded
nextname
nip
EMIT
noname
object, object
object class
object-map discussion
of
off
on
Only
open-blocks
open-file
open-path-file
open-pipe
or
order
orig, control-flow stack item
os-class
over
overrides
overrides usage
pad
PAD size
PAD use by nonstandard words
page
DO, ?DO, WITHIN)
parse
parse-word
included
path+
path-allot
path=
perform
pi
pick
postpone, postpone
postpone,
POSTPONE applied to [IF]
POSTPONE or [COMPILE] applied to TO
precision
previous
previous, search order empty
print
printdebugdata
private discussion
protected
protected discussion
ptr, ptr
public
query
quit
r, stack item type
r/o
r/w
r>
r@
rdrop
read-file
read-line
recover
recurse
RECURSE appears after DOES>
recursive
refill
rename-file
REPEAT
MS
reposition-file
REPOSITION-FILE, outside the file's boundaries
represent
REPRESENT, results when float is out of range
require
require, placement in files
required
resize
resize-file
restore-input
RESTORE-INPUT, Argument type mismatch
restrict
gforth-fast
roll
Root
rot
rp!
rp0
rp@
rshift
RSHIFT, large shift counts
S"
S", number of string buffers
S", size of string buffer
s>d
s\"
save-buffer
save-buffers
save-input
savesystem
savesystem during `gforthmi'
scope
scr
seal
search
search-wordlist
see
SEE, source and format of output
selector
selector implementation, class
selector usage
self
set-current
set-order
set-precision
sf!
sf@
sf@ or sf! used with an address that is not single-float aligned
sf_, stack item type
sfalign
sfaligned
sfloat%
sfloat+
sfloats
sh
sign
simple-see
simple-see-range
WORD
PAD
SLiteral
slurp-fid
slurp-file
sm/rem
source
source-id
SOURCE-ID, behaviour when BLK is non-zero
sourcefilename
sourceline#
sp!
sp0
sp@
space
spaces
span
DOES>-parts
state - effect on the text interpreter
STATE values
static
stderr
stdin
stdout
str<
str=
f., fe., fs.)
WORD
string-prefix?
struct
struct usage
sub-list?
super
swap
system
table
THEN
this
this implementation
this usage
this and catch
threading-method
throw
THROW-codes used in the system
thru
tib
time&date
TMP, TEMP - environment variable
TO
to-this
TO on non-VALUEs
TO on non-VALUEs and non-locals
toupper
true
try
tuck
type
typewhite
U+DO
u, stack item type
U-DO
u.
u.r
u<
u<=
u>
u>=
ud, stack item type
ud.
ud.r
um*
um/mod
', POSTPONE, ['], [COMPILE]
unloop
UNREACHABLE
UNTIL
UNTIL loop
unused
update
UPDATE, no current block buffer
updated?
use
User
utime
Value
var, var
Variable
vlist
Vocabulary
vocs
previous
also
w, stack item type
w/o
What's
WHILE
WHILE loop
wid, stack item type
with
within
word
WORD buffer size
WORD, string overflow
wordlist
words
write-file
write-line
xor
xt, stack item type
xt-new
xt-see
~~
~~, removal with Emacs
However, in 1998 the bar was raised when the major commercial Forth vendors switched to native code compilers.
i.e. it is stored in the user's home directory.
This notation is also known as Postfix or RPN (Reverse Polish Notation).
therefore it's a good idea to
avoid ) in word names.
We can't tell if it found them or not, but assume for now that it did not
That's not quite true. If you press the up-arrow key on your keyboard you should be able to scroll back to any earlier command, edit it and re-enter it.
Actually, there are some subtle differences -- see section The Text Interpreter.
For example, `/usr/local/share/gforth...'
It's easy to generate the separate
notation from that by just separating the floating-point numbers out:
e.g. ( n r1 u r2 -- r3 ) becomes ( n u -- ) ( F: r1 r2 --
r3 ).
Sometimes, the term dictionary is used to refer to the search data structure embodied in word lists and headers, because it is used for looking up names, just as you would in a conventional dictionary.
To be precise, they have no interpretation semantics (see section Interpretation and Compilation Semantics).
well, not in a way that is portable.
Well, often it can be -- but
not in a Standard, portable way. It's safer to use a Value (read
on).
Strictly speaking, the
mechanism that compile, uses to convert an xt into something
in the code area is implementation-dependent. A threaded implementation
might spit out the execution token directly whilst another
implementation might spit out a native code sequence.
It is legitimate both to read and write to this data area.
Exercise: use this
example as a starting point for your own implementation of Value
and TO -- if you get stuck, investigate the behaviour of ' and
['].
In standard terminology, "appends to the current definition".
In standard terminology: The default interpretation semantics are its execution semantics; the default compilation semantics are to append its execution semantics to the execution semantics of the current definition.
For a more detailed discussion of this topic, see
M. Anton Ertl,
State-smartness--Why
it is Evil and How to Exorcise it, EuroForth '98.
Depending upon the compilation semantics of the
word. If the word has default compilation semantics, the xt will
represent compile,. Otherwise (e.g., for immediate words), the
xt will represent execute.
A recent RFI answer requires that compiling words should only be executed in compile state, so this example is not guaranteed to work on all standard systems, but on any decent system it will work.
This is an expanded version of the material in section Introducing the Text Interpreter.
When the text interpreter is processing input from the
keyboard, this area of memory is called the terminal input buffer
(TIB) and is addressed by the (obsolescent) words TIB and
#TIB.
This happens if the word was
defined as COMPILE-ONLY.
In other words, the text interpreter processes the contents of the input buffer by parsing strings from the parse area until the parse area is empty.
This is how parsing words work.
Exercise
for the reader: what would happen if the 3 were replaced with
4?
For example, 0-9 when the number base is decimal or 0-9, A-F when the number base is hexadecimal.
Some Forth implementations provide a similar scheme by
implementing $ etc. as parsing words that process the subsequent
number in the input stream and push it onto the stack. For example, see
Number Conversion and Literals, by Wil Baden; Forth Dimensions
20(3) pages 26--27. In such implementations, unlike in Gforth, a space
is required between the prefix and the number.
The ANS Forth definition of
buffer is intended not to cause disk I/O; if the data associated
with the particular block is already stored in a block buffer due to an
earlier block command, buffer will return that block
buffer and the existing contents of the block will be
available. Otherwise, buffer will simply assign a new, empty
block buffer for the block.
In compiler construction terminology, all places dominated by the definition of the local.
This feature is also known as extended records. It is the main innovation in the Oberon language; in other words, adding this feature to Modula-2 led Wirth to create a new language, write a new compiler etc. Adding this feature to Forth just required a few lines of code.
Moreover, for any word that calls
catch and was defined before loading
objects.fs, you have to redefine it like I redefined
catch: : catch this >r catch r> to-this ;
This is Self terminology; in C++ terminology: virtual function table.
A longer version of this critique can be found in On Standardizing Object-Oriented Forth Extensions (Forth Dimensions, May 1997) by Anton Ertl.
This isn't portable, because these words emit stuff in data space; it works because Gforth has unified code/data spaces. Assembler isn't likely to be portable anyway.
In my opinion, though, you should think thrice before using a doubly-linked list (whatever implementation).
The Unix kernel actually recognises two types of files: executable files and files of data, where the data is processed by an interpreter that is specified on the "interpreter line" -- the first line of the file, starting with the sequence #!. There may be a small limit (e.g., 32) on the number of characters that may be specified on the interpreter line.
We use a one-stack notation, even though we have separate data and floating-point stacks; The separate notation can be generated easily from the unified notation.
This document was generated on 8 June 2007 using texi2html 1.56k.